Anonymous
07/07/2022 09:34
Subject: Based on appearence alone, do you consider this a luxury SUV?
No, it's Tahoe with make up on. Noway I am driving that junk.
Anonymous
07/07/2022 09:34
Subject: Based on appearence alone, do you consider this a luxury SUV?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You sound out of touch. $80k isn’t a luxury SUV price point anymore. A Tahoe with leather seats is gonna be $75+
An X5 with leather starts at 62k, and X7 starts at 78k. A Tahoe is a luxury SUV aimed at buyers who prefer to purchase from American manufactures and they are priced similarly to other luxury SUVs.
Or families like mine with 4 kids. I wish we could still make a bmw or Mercedes work but the back row is just too small
Anonymous
07/07/2022 09:33
Subject: Re:Based on appearence alone, do you consider this a luxury SUV?
Really depends on the inside features. Most likely - yes the Denali line is very lux
Anonymous
07/07/2022 09:32
Subject: Re:Based on appearence alone, do you consider this a luxury SUV?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, it's a luxury SUV. GMC vehicles don't come cheap, especially the fully loaded Denali's. If I was a multi-millionaire, and money was no object, this type of SUV would be the type of vehicle that I would buy. I like to sit high up and see the road ahead of me. No low down Ferrari's or Lamborghini's for me.
You'd probably be able to afford it now if you didn't spend so much on unnecessary apostrophes. Sorry, apostrophe's.
I read and re-read the post you commented on. The apostrophes (commas) seem about right to me but I'll admit that I'm no English major. You obviously are which is why you would comment on something so trivial and petty.
NP. “Denali’s” and “Ferrari's or Lamborghini's” are straight-up wrong.
PS. Also, if you really care, it should be “If I were a multi-millionaire” (subjunctive). And there’s a stray comma but that’s not a biggie.
Anonymous
07/07/2022 09:29
Subject: Re:Based on appearence alone, do you consider this a luxury SUV?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, it's a luxury SUV. GMC vehicles don't come cheap, especially the fully loaded Denali's. If I was a multi-millionaire, and money was no object, this type of SUV would be the type of vehicle that I would buy. I like to sit high up and see the road ahead of me. No low down Ferrari's or Lamborghini's for me.
You'd probably be able to afford it now if you didn't spend so much on unnecessary apostrophes. Sorry, apostrophe's.
I read and re-read the post you commented on. The apostrophes (commas) seem about right to me but I'll admit that I'm no English major. You obviously are which is why you would comment on something so trivial and petty.
NP. “Denali’s” and “Ferrari's or Lamborghini's” are straight-up wrong.
Anonymous
07/07/2022 09:27
Subject: Re:Based on appearence alone, do you consider this a luxury SUV?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
For $80K, its rear, rear quarter, and side profile do absolutely nothing for me. In black or white, it would just blend it with everything else large on the road; like a fed or rental car company fleet SUV. With a metallic paint, the ostentatious huge chrome grille says tarted up brash American SUV.
Compared to a $93K New Range Rover, which oozes elegance and $$$$$ from every angle, it seems like a rip-off. That said, the New Range Rover is probably more like $100K if you can even find one for sale, and 25% more dinero is not an insignificant sum.
The Range Rover is ugly. And always broken.
The Range Rover comes from a tradition of driving over rutty country roads and fields, which implies having money. The SUV is for driving around suburbia.
Anonymous
07/07/2022 00:41
Subject: Re:Based on appearence alone, do you consider this a luxury SUV?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, it's a luxury SUV. GMC vehicles don't come cheap, especially the fully loaded Denali's. If I was a multi-millionaire, and money was no object, this type of SUV would be the type of vehicle that I would buy. I like to sit high up and see the road ahead of me. No low down Ferrari's or Lamborghini's for me.
You'd probably be able to afford it now if you didn't spend so much on unnecessary apostrophes. Sorry, apostrophe's.
I read and re-read the post you commented on. The apostrophes (commas) seem about right to me but I'll admit that I'm no English major. You obviously are which is why you would comment on something so trivial and petty.
Anonymous
07/06/2022 18:34
Subject: Re:Based on appearence alone, do you consider this a luxury SUV?
You need help!Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, it's a luxury SUV. GMC vehicles don't come cheap, especially the fully loaded Denali's. If I was a multi-millionaire, and money was no object, this type of SUV would be the type of vehicle that I would buy. I like to sit high up and see the road ahead of me. No low down Ferrari's or Lamborghini's for me.
You'd probably be able to afford it now if you didn't spend so much on unnecessary apostrophes. Sorry, apostrophe's.
Anonymous
07/06/2022 17:12
Subject: Based on appearence alone, do you consider this a luxury SUV?
Cool. I bought a new car once when I was 22. Before I knew better. Now I always buy cars that are 2-3 years old, because I know better. No regrets either.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Buying a new car is such a bad investment, I don't know why people do this. Well, I guess it's a status symbol.
I'm in my 50's and have only ever bought one brand new vehicle. It wasn't bought for status, I just felt that I work hard and deserved to treat myself for once in my life. I've had the vehicle for 7 years now, no regrets.
Anonymous
07/06/2022 17:08
Subject: Re:Based on appearence alone, do you consider this a luxury SUV?
Anonymous wrote:Yes, it's a luxury SUV. GMC vehicles don't come cheap, especially the fully loaded Denali's. If I was a multi-millionaire, and money was no object, this type of SUV would be the type of vehicle that I would buy. I like to sit high up and see the road ahead of me. No low down Ferrari's or Lamborghini's for me.
You'd probably be able to afford it now if you didn't spend so much on unnecessary apostrophes. Sorry, apostrophe's.
Anonymous
07/06/2022 17:03
Subject: Re:Based on appearence alone, do you consider this a luxury SUV?
Anonymous wrote:
For $80K, its rear, rear quarter, and side profile do absolutely nothing for me. In black or white, it would just blend it with everything else large on the road; like a fed or rental car company fleet SUV. With a metallic paint, the ostentatious huge chrome grille says tarted up brash American SUV.
Compared to a $93K New Range Rover, which oozes elegance and $$$$$ from every angle, it seems like a rip-off. That said, the New Range Rover is probably more like $100K if you can even find one for sale, and 25% more dinero is not an insignificant sum.
The Range Rover is ugly. And always broken.
Anonymous
07/06/2022 17:02
Subject: Based on appearence alone, do you consider this a luxury SUV?
I had one. It was very comfortable. The Denali trim line has a bigger engine and some nice upgrades. It was too big for me, though, so I bought a smaller non-American made SUV. I don’t think of it as a luxury SUV, but it was nice.
Anonymous
07/06/2022 16:33
Subject: Based on appearence alone, do you consider this a luxury SUV?
It’s expensive, so it’s almost luxury in that sense. But it’s also tasteless, so not “high class” luxury.
Anonymous
07/05/2022 22:51
Subject: Based on appearence alone, do you consider this a luxury SUV?
People who buy Yukons can’t afford a new Range Rover.
Anonymous
07/05/2022 22:15
Subject: Based on appearence alone, do you consider this a luxury SUV?
Oh sweetie, it's not 1995 anymore.