Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s bad enough that the rest of us need to deal with your sweat left on equipment at the gym, but now we need to deal with whatever wetness is usually kept in your underwear too? Gross. Workout clothes are too thin to be your underwear too.
Sweetie, if you have things contained in your underwear you need to see a doctor.
Do you not have a period? Do you not have excretions in between your periods? There is more than sweat down there. And what about chafing
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s bad enough that the rest of us need to deal with your sweat left on equipment at the gym, but now we need to deal with whatever wetness is usually kept in your underwear too? Gross. Workout clothes are too thin to be your underwear too.
Sweetie, if you have things contained in your underwear you need to see a doctor.
Anonymous wrote:I do not go commando.
I think many of you women get off having the seam in your crotch. Foreplay during the workout and finish up in the locker room?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why I would find this appealing? The seam of the leggings would then likely go into my v and i'd have camel toe?
You need better active wear.
Respectfully, some of us have vulvas that are very susceptible to cameltoe. I don’t really care about it anymore but if I really want to avoid it I need a layer with no seam that holds everything together (and I still sometimes get it if I’m not careful). I wear quality activewear.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why I would find this appealing? The seam of the leggings would then likely go into my v and i'd have camel toe?
You need better active wear.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Male here……panty lines are terrible. For those who wears thongs thank you.
No one cares what you think.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Male here……panty lines are terrible. For those who wears thongs thank you.
No one cares what you think.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Work out attire is designed to be worn sans underwear. It’s about freedom of movement and flexibility without binding or bunching.
Honestly you folks are a gaggle of prudes.
Or some people simply prefer to wear underwear under their workout clothes. I'm not sure what your preferences have to do with my preferences. I'm not judging you for going commando -- I just personally don't want to.
Not all workout clothing has a liner -- many leggings and short don't, actually. Since I prefer to wear my own underwear with workout clothes, I look for workout clothes that are not lined. I like the quality and feel of my own underwear to most workout liners.
I don't wear underwear that binds or bunches. Not ever, but especially not when I workout. I buy underwear specifically for its' comfort and ability to stay put.
I often wear period underwear in lieu of a pantyliner on heavy period days. This also facilitates being able to workout on those days. Again, this is much preferable to a lined workout bottom for obvious reasons.
It's also weird that you are saying people who prefer to wear underwear under their workout clothes "prudes" when there are multiple people on the first page of this thread arguing that the main reason not to do it is to avoid visible panty lines, as though the slight shadow of an underwear line in someone's workout attire is a pearl-clutching event.
People should wear what is most comfortable for workouts, and there really are not any rules beyond sanitation and commonly agreed-upon decency standards. You do you.
Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why I would find this appealing? The seam of the leggings would then likely go into my v and i'd have camel toe?
Anonymous wrote:Male here……panty lines are terrible. For those who wears thongs thank you.
Anonymous wrote:It’s bad enough that the rest of us need to deal with your sweat left on equipment at the gym, but now we need to deal with whatever wetness is usually kept in your underwear too? Gross. Workout clothes are too thin to be your underwear too.