Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect there may be a chunk in grad school or SAH with kids, with zero income, pulling down the average.
Public service is popular. Obama was probably earning in that range at 34. Those jobs don't necessarily pay well.
Yes. I'm looking at my Brown class and so many went into public service or top law schools reaching for judgeship. As a foreigner, it's amazing to me. The very wealthy families can afford to send their offspring to work in power positions that shape the future of this country. It's a self-serving mechanism that keeps the poor and unconnected from gaining decision-making power. Do you think all these people working on the Hill and buying the million $ housing are doing it from a staffer salary? Meanwhile, the poor are busy working their butts off to get a well paid job and accumulate some wealth while the elite is deciding almost everything.
If they are doing that, they are pulling in the big bucks - Harvard Law grad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of Ivy League students come from relatively wealthy families, which means they’re able to take on meaningful work with lower salaries. Or they’ve learned that money isn’t the only measure of success!
+1
They work at NPR and will inherit millions.
Sincerely,
Their state school coworker
If NPR wants to live their values, offset increasing inequality and support social mobility, they should hire state school graduates who are qualified and come from honors and academic scholarship programs. This is what my organization does. NPR staff should be advocating for this along with their EDI initiatives, unless it makes them too uncomfortable given their own backgrounds.
Most of those graduates cannot survive on the salary at NPR. Target pays better for entry level.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect there may be a chunk in grad school or SAH with kids, with zero income, pulling down the average.
Public service is popular. Obama was probably earning in that range at 34. Those jobs don't necessarily pay well.
+1. SAHMs always like to brag about their “MRS” Ivy degrees
Disagree. I went to Harvard. No one uses that term. No one. It's insulting
At Princeton we talked about “future Senator’s wives”, you know the pretty ones majoring in art history
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect there may be a chunk in grad school or SAH with kids, with zero income, pulling down the average.
Public service is popular. Obama was probably earning in that range at 34. Those jobs don't necessarily pay well.
+1. SAHMs always like to brag about their “MRS” Ivy degrees
Disagree. I went to Harvard. No one uses that term. No one. It's insulting
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect there may be a chunk in grad school or SAH with kids, with zero income, pulling down the average.
Public service is popular. Obama was probably earning in that range at 34. Those jobs don't necessarily pay well.
Yes. I'm looking at my Brown class and so many went into public service or top law schools reaching for judgeship. As a foreigner, it's amazing to me. The very wealthy families can afford to send their offspring to work in power positions that shape the future of this country. It's a self-serving mechanism that keeps the poor and unconnected from gaining decision-making power. Do you think all these people working on the Hill and buying the million $ housing are doing it from a staffer salary? Meanwhile, the poor are busy working their butts off to get a well paid job and accumulate some wealth while the elite is deciding almost everything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect there may be a chunk in grad school or SAH with kids, with zero income, pulling down the average.
Public service is popular. Obama was probably earning in that range at 34. Those jobs don't necessarily pay well.
+1. SAHMs always like to brag about their “MRS” Ivy degrees
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of Ivy League students come from relatively wealthy families, which means they’re able to take on meaningful work with lower salaries. Or they’ve learned that money isn’t the only measure of success!
+1
They work at NPR and will inherit millions.
Sincerely,
Their state school coworker
If NPR wants to live their values, offset increasing inequality and support social mobility, they should hire state school graduates who are qualified and come from honors and academic scholarship programs. This is what my organization does. NPR staff should be advocating for this along with their EDI initiatives, unless it makes them too uncomfortable given their own backgrounds.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect there may be a chunk in grad school or SAH with kids, with zero income, pulling down the average.
Public service is popular. Obama was probably earning in that range at 34. Those jobs don't necessarily pay well.
Yes. I'm looking at my Brown class and so many went into public service or top law schools reaching for judgeship. As a foreigner, it's amazing to me. The very wealthy families can afford to send their offspring to work in power positions that shape the future of this country. It's a self-serving mechanism that keeps the poor and unconnected from gaining decision-making power. Do you think all these people working on the Hill and buying the million $ housing are doing it from a staffer salary? Meanwhile, the poor are busy working their butts off to get a well paid job and accumulate some wealth while the elite is deciding almost everything.
I'm shocked this is "amazing" to you. Where are you from where this isn't the case?
Europe. Of course it's amazing to me, don't you advertise yourself as the land of opportunity, equality, pull oneself up by one's bootstraps and various other c*ap? At least we're honest about the privilege.
I guess you haven’t lived here long enough to understand that advertise as the land of opportunity is propaganda to keep taxes low, minimum social safety net, and low investment in education. In our imagined scenario, if you are poor it’s because you made bad choices, because everyone has the opportunity to succeed, you know. Why should taxpayers fund people who don’t even choose to improve themselves, they obviously had a chance. And so on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect there may be a chunk in grad school or SAH with kids, with zero income, pulling down the average.
Public service is popular. Obama was probably earning in that range at 34. Those jobs don't necessarily pay well.
Yes. I'm looking at my Brown class and so many went into public service or top law schools reaching for judgeship. As a foreigner, it's amazing to me. The very wealthy families can afford to send their offspring to work in power positions that shape the future of this country. It's a self-serving mechanism that keeps the poor and unconnected from gaining decision-making power. Do you think all these people working on the Hill and buying the million $ housing are doing it from a staffer salary? Meanwhile, the poor are busy working their butts off to get a well paid job and accumulate some wealth while the elite is deciding almost everything.
I'm shocked this is "amazing" to you. Where are you from where this isn't the case?
Europe. Of course it's amazing to me, don't you advertise yourself as the land of opportunity, equality, pull oneself up by one's bootstraps and various other c*ap? At least we're honest about the privilege.
I guess you haven’t lived here long enough to understand that advertise as the land of opportunity is propaganda to keep taxes low, minimum social safety net, and low investment in education. In our imagined scenario, if you are poor it’s because you made bad choices, because everyone has the opportunity to succeed, you know. Why should taxpayers fund people who don’t even choose to improve themselves, they obviously had a chance. And so on.
“Land of opportunity” and “pull yourself up by your bootstraps” doesn’t mean “Everyone in America gets to go to Harvard and become President.” My poor immigrant parents worked their tails off and have a great grand daughter who did go to Harvard and is a “decision maker.” My husband’s grand parents fled a worn torn country and would be amazed by his “status” and “wealth” (which is nothing by DCUM standards). There IS opportunity in America. That doesn’t mean everyone gets the same opportunities, or that it can’t improve, or that it will happen in one generation, but it’s the best we’ve got and better than any other country.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of Ivy League students come from relatively wealthy families, which means they’re able to take on meaningful work with lower salaries. Or they’ve learned that money isn’t the only measure of success!
+1
They work at NPR and will inherit millions.
Sincerely,
Their state school coworker
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect there may be a chunk in grad school or SAH with kids, with zero income, pulling down the average.
Public service is popular. Obama was probably earning in that range at 34. Those jobs don't necessarily pay well.
Yes. I'm looking at my Brown class and so many went into public service or top law schools reaching for judgeship. As a foreigner, it's amazing to me. The very wealthy families can afford to send their offspring to work in power positions that shape the future of this country. It's a self-serving mechanism that keeps the poor and unconnected from gaining decision-making power. Do you think all these people working on the Hill and buying the million $ housing are doing it from a staffer salary? Meanwhile, the poor are busy working their butts off to get a well paid job and accumulate some wealth while the elite is deciding almost everything.
I'm shocked this is "amazing" to you. Where are you from where this isn't the case?
Europe. Of course it's amazing to me, don't you advertise yourself as the land of opportunity, equality, pull oneself up by one's bootstraps and various other c*ap? At least we're honest about the privilege.
I guess you haven’t lived here long enough to understand that advertise as the land of opportunity is propaganda to keep taxes low, minimum social safety net, and low investment in education. In our imagined scenario, if you are poor it’s because you made bad choices, because everyone has the opportunity to succeed, you know. Why should taxpayers fund people who don’t even choose to improve themselves, they obviously had a chance. And so on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect there may be a chunk in grad school or SAH with kids, with zero income, pulling down the average.
Public service is popular. Obama was probably earning in that range at 34. Those jobs don't necessarily pay well.
Yes. I'm looking at my Brown class and so many went into public service or top law schools reaching for judgeship. As a foreigner, it's amazing to me. The very wealthy families can afford to send their offspring to work in power positions that shape the future of this country. It's a self-serving mechanism that keeps the poor and unconnected from gaining decision-making power. Do you think all these people working on the Hill and buying the million $ housing are doing it from a staffer salary? Meanwhile, the poor are busy working their butts off to get a well paid job and accumulate some wealth while the elite is deciding almost everything.
I'm shocked this is "amazing" to you. Where are you from where this isn't the case?
Europe. Of course it's amazing to me, don't you advertise yourself as the land of opportunity, equality, pull oneself up by one's bootstraps and various other c*ap? At least we're honest about the privilege.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect there may be a chunk in grad school or SAH with kids, with zero income, pulling down the average.
Public service is popular. Obama was probably earning in that range at 34. Those jobs don't necessarily pay well.
Yes. I'm looking at my Brown class and so many went into public service or top law schools reaching for judgeship. As a foreigner, it's amazing to me. The very wealthy families can afford to send their offspring to work in power positions that shape the future of this country. It's a self-serving mechanism that keeps the poor and unconnected from gaining decision-making power. Do you think all these people working on the Hill and buying the million $ housing are doing it from a staffer salary? Meanwhile, the poor are busy working their butts off to get a well paid job and accumulate some wealth while the elite is deciding almost everything.