Anonymous wrote:So on brand for Duke.
Anonymous wrote:I really want to know more about her family now. How rich is she exactly?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s a sad state of things when an administrator would have to think of running a plagiarism check on the college grad speaker.
It should be routine. Kids high school papers are all checked I assumed that continued through college.
It is a bit of surprise that they don’t check these things. When I worked on the Hill, we ran all speeches through software that checked for plagiarism (and this was more than a decade ago).
I'd be curious to know if a plagiarism algorithm would catch it. She actually worked very hard rearranging every phrase. The side by side, makes it clear she didn't just regurgitate something that had been shared with her, but labored over hiding the origins. She better have the PR firm working up responses to whatever's about to be discovered in the rest of her published work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s a sad state of things when an administrator would have to think of running a plagiarism check on the college grad speaker.
It should be routine. Kids high school papers are all checked I assumed that continued through college.
It is a bit of surprise that they don’t check these things. When I worked on the Hill, we ran all speeches through software that checked for plagiarism (and this was more than a decade ago).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s a sad state of things when an administrator would have to think of running a plagiarism check on the college grad speaker.
It should be routine. Kids high school papers are all checked I assumed that continued through college.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To its credit, it's the Duke school newspaper which carried the story first.
Apparently Duke required those who wanted to give the speech to submit an outline. The decision as to which speech would be given was based on the outline. So, the exact speech wasn't submitted for preapproval.
And she was an editor for the same paper...
Anonymous wrote:To its credit, it's the Duke school newspaper which carried the story first.
Apparently Duke required those who wanted to give the speech to submit an outline. The decision as to which speech would be given was based on the outline. So, the exact speech wasn't submitted for preapproval.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anybody else think both speeches sound meandering and boring?
Aren’t all commencement speeches meandering and boring?
Anonymous wrote:I don't know about the rest of it but I wouldn't judge someone's background based on their accent. A friend is a refugee from a non English speaking country. Her accent in English is perfect, she sounds like a well-educated midwesterner, but only because her family was desperate to put their experience in their native country behind them and devoted in outsized share of resources to being sure there children spoke unaccented English.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The irony is that if she were like my kids who couldn't be bothered putting in the effort to be strivers, she'd be fine today.
Here's the thing - she's likely been getting away with this forever. No way this is her first rodeo at cheating, copying, and plagiarizing.
She finally got caught because she did it on too big of a stage. Her scheming has worked in the classroom and offices for many years. In short, she believed her own bullsh#t.
See also Mackenzie Fierceton.
https://www.chronicle.com/article/the-dredging
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The irony is that if she were like my kids who couldn't be bothered putting in the effort to be strivers, she'd be fine today.
Here's the thing - she's likely been getting away with this forever. No way this is her first rodeo at cheating, copying, and plagiarizing.
She finally got caught because she did it on too big of a stage. Her scheming has worked in the classroom and offices for many years. In short, she believed her own bullsh#t.