Anonymous wrote:This is so common in education. I am currently watching our principal ‘micromanage’ a colleague, and it isn’t going to end well. The colleague is a young teacher who doesn’t have much experience, but she’s in my department and I think she’s doing a good job. The principal really seems to dislike her on a personal level, and has put her on an improvement plan and subjected her to multiple ‘observations’, which has resulted in making the young woman a nervous wreck. She confided in me last week that she can’t sleep and has no family or support network because she moved to the area for this job. I hate watching this kind of thing, but I’ve seen it before and there’s nothing I can do. I know her contract won’t be renewed because that’s what this principal did to the last person she targeted. It’s a private school and we don’t have the same protection as in public. The principal does this periodically to teachers about whom ‘important’ parents have complained. I hate it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Managers are not always the best employees and they know it. Often times they are jealous of someone under them that possesses skills they do not. From what I have observed in my companies it can be pure jealousy and fear of being exposed as incompetent.
This. 100x this.
This is what I've observed most often.
In one case, a bunch of us got a new manager. She was insecure and jealous. We had been a high-performing team who won awards. But, suddenly, we all had a lot of "problems" we had never had before she came along.
At first, I thought she was just targeting me, but then I saw she was targeted a whole bunch of us. I resigned and left. She is gross and sad. I heard later she drove many of the people out and then couldn't meet the revenue goals...She was still there when I last checked.
Companies like bullies and mediocrity even though they say they don't.
This is what I can never understand-- why leadership seems to view these awful managers through rose-colored glasses and will never fire them when it becomes obvious they are failing as managers. If an award-winning team suddenly begins to fail under an inept-- and highly disliked-- manager, just MAYBE it's the bad manager who has to go? So sad leadership is blind and opted to keep her and permit her to destroy a good team because.....?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Managers are not always the best employees and they know it. Often times they are jealous of someone under them that possesses skills they do not. From what I have observed in my companies it can be pure jealousy and fear of being exposed as incompetent.
This. 100x this.
This is what I've observed most often.
In one case, a bunch of us got a new manager. She was insecure and jealous. We had been a high-performing team who won awards. But, suddenly, we all had a lot of "problems" we had never had before she came along.
At first, I thought she was just targeting me, but then I saw she was targeted a whole bunch of us. I resigned and left. She is gross and sad. I heard later she drove many of the people out and then couldn't meet the revenue goals...She was still there when I last checked.
Companies like bullies and mediocrity even though they say they don't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one will say they pushed someone out "for no reason." You may not know the reason or consider it valid but if it happened to you, the person had a reason they considered valid.
Yeah, fired people often claim it's "for no reason." It very, very rarely is.
But we’re not talking about people who get fired. If someone gets fired, it’s “for cause” so even if that person doesn’t want to admit it, there was a reason. I’ve listened to people dissemble about stuff like this “oh they just hated me for no reason” and then it turns out they just weren’t doing their job.
But this thread is about being passive-aggressively pushed out— having your work environment made so miserable you leave on your own. This is something else. If management had a reason to fire someone like this, why not do it? Or give negative reviews that provide the specific reasons for the problems? If management has a reason, why not just be clear?
And the answer is often that there is no valid reason. The manager is scapegoating the person to cover for their own incompetence. Or they feel threatened by the workers competence and want to neutralize them as a threat. They have a totally non-work-related reason for disliking them (reasons I’ve heard people don’t like a person: he’s too tall, she seems stuck up, she has a bad haircut, he went to Duke, she’s Canadian). So they micromanage or staff them to terrible projects or “forget” to include them in key meetings. They spread nasty rumors, exclude them from informal socializing, bad mouth them to higher ups or other supervisors. They make work a living hell until the person leaves because they can’t take it any more.
It happens all the time. There are so many people who, when given the minimal power of middle management, will wield it selfishly and unfairly. Lots of jerks in the world.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Managers are not always the best employees and they know it. Often times they are jealous of someone under them that possesses skills they do not. From what I have observed in my companies it can be pure jealousy and fear of being exposed as incompetent.
This. 100x this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why did you target that person? Jealousy? envy?
Chance of a manager saying she is a micromanager - less than 1%
Chance of a manager saying she pushed out someone - less than .1%
Chance of a manager saying she pushed out someone for no reason - less than .00001%
Anonymous wrote:Why did you target that person? Jealousy? envy?
Anonymous wrote:Why did you target that person? Jealousy? envy?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one will say they pushed someone out "for no reason." You may not know the reason or consider it valid but if it happened to you, the person had a reason they considered valid.
Yeah, fired people often claim it's "for no reason." It very, very rarely is.
But we’re not talking about people who get fired. If someone gets fired, it’s “for cause” so even if that person doesn’t want to admit it, there was a reason. I’ve listened to people dissemble about stuff like this “oh they just hated me for no reason” and then it turns out they just weren’t doing their job.
But this thread is about being passive-aggressively pushed out— having your work environment made so miserable you leave on your own. This is something else. If management had a reason to fire someone like this, why not do it? Or give negative reviews that provide the specific reasons for the problems? If management has a reason, why not just be clear?
And the answer is often that there is no valid reason. The manager is scapegoating the person to cover for their own incompetence. Or they feel threatened by the workers competence and want to neutralize them as a threat. They have a totally non-work-related reason for disliking them (reasons I’ve heard people don’t like a person: he’s too tall, she seems stuck up, she has a bad haircut, he went to Duke, she’s Canadian). So they micromanage or staff them to terrible projects or “forget” to include them in key meetings. They spread nasty rumors, exclude them from informal socializing, bad mouth them to higher ups or other supervisors. They make work a living hell until the person leaves because they can’t take it any more.
It happens all the time. There are so many people who, when given the minimal power of middle management, will wield it selfishly and unfairly. Lots of jerks in the world.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one will say they pushed someone out "for no reason." You may not know the reason or consider it valid but if it happened to you, the person had a reason they considered valid.
Yeah, fired people often claim it's "for no reason." It very, very rarely is.