Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wait, so these classes for teachers are literally just like, click though the slideshows on your own time? There's no actual professor or graded papers or tests?
Now at least i know where their teachers got all their ideas for waste of time non-educational google slides.
It’s student-directed asynchronous learning. If it was good enough for our kids, it should be good enough for the teachers.
So your kid did an ENTIRE course asynchronously? There was never a day where the teacher was instructing live? Tells us what school this was where this happened. What grade level. I’m fascinated to find out where this happened.
Anonymous wrote:Yes this a real issue based on what I’m reading in the teacher group.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wait, so these classes for teachers are literally just like, click though the slideshows on your own time? There's no actual professor or graded papers or tests?
Now at least i know where their teachers got all their ideas for waste of time non-educational google slides.
It’s student-directed asynchronous learning. If it was good enough for our kids, it should be good enough for the teachers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do not see the point at all in paying teachers to get masters degrees.
They don’t pay you to get the degree, they pay you more if you have the degree. Plenty of industries do this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wait, so these classes for teachers are literally just like, click though the slideshows on your own time? There's no actual professor or graded papers or tests?
Now at least i know where their teachers got all their ideas for waste of time non-educational google slides.
Yep. Maybe FCPS will stop taking credits from diploma mills like UVA.
At $550+ per credit, I’d hardly call UVA a diploma mill. The Idaho school is charging $55 per credit. THAT is a diploma mill. FCPS is correct in only accepting half a credit.
Anonymous wrote:I do not see the point at all in paying teachers to get masters degrees.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wait, so these classes for teachers are literally just like, click though the slideshows on your own time? There's no actual professor or graded papers or tests?
Now at least i know where their teachers got all their ideas for waste of time non-educational google slides.
Yep. Maybe FCPS will stop taking credits from diploma mills like UVA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wait, so these classes for teachers are literally just like, click though the slideshows on your own time? There's no actual professor or graded papers or tests?
Now at least i know where their teachers got all their ideas for waste of time non-educational google slides.
It’s student-directed asynchronous learning. If it was good enough for our kids, it should be good enough for the teachers.
Anonymous wrote:Wait, so these classes for teachers are literally just like, click though the slideshows on your own time? There's no actual professor or graded papers or tests?
Now at least i know where their teachers got all their ideas for waste of time non-educational google slides.
Anonymous wrote:Wait, so these classes for teachers are literally just like, click though the slideshows on your own time? There's no actual professor or graded papers or tests?
Now at least i know where their teachers got all their ideas for waste of time non-educational google slides.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wait, teachers want a $2000 raise for paying $50 for a useless course? That’s crazy!
If they took 20 credits’ worth, it would have cost $1,000.
That said, the courses are BS. I’m sorry teachers wasted their time in what seemed like a sweet deal, and I don’t blame them for trying, but I also don’t blame FCPS for seeing through what a joke they were
How does a university offer quality coursework for so little? How do they pay their professors? How do the professors grade and offer feedback and interact with the students?