Anonymous wrote:At around the 12 we switched over to sleep away camps. There were fewer neighborhood kids that were home and they didn't care as much about swim team anymore. Lots of kids they knew dropped out of it and it had lost it's appeal. So for next year, you may want to consider a sleep away camp at least for a few weeks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids also did summer swim team (eventually becoming life guards and assistant coaches as you hope your kids will do) and when they were around the age of yours, DH and I split up the afternoons, so one of us would be at home. We didn't think it was right to put the responsibility of baby sitting on our oldest. But, equally important, we didn't want the kids sitting around all afternoon watching TV or playing video games. With one of us at home, they could make plans with friends (e.g., to hang out at our house, play tennis, go for a bike ride, etc.). They could also get little jobs in the neighborhood -- e.g., dog-walking, which is far more lucrative than babysitting (our daughter actually bought an Apple watch with her dog-walking money). Or, they could read or come up with some project to entertain themselves --e.g., our sons repainted an old night table as a birthday gift for their sister. I realize we were fortunate to be able to have the flexibility in our work schedules, but, if you can swing it at all, OP, I would highly recommend that you consider this as an option.
Yes, my kids will definitely be volunteering with swim team, coaching and lifeguarding when old enough. With a summer birthday for my oldest that won't be for a few more years though.
We do come home earlier some days. My husband has more flexibility because he can go in early and come home early where I have core hours I am expected to be in the office, but can WFH 1 day a week. A lot of time it is hot so they don't feel like being outside in the afternoon and with activities in the evenings (meets and another sport) they enjoy the down time.
Anonymous wrote:My kids also did summer swim team (eventually becoming life guards and assistant coaches as you hope your kids will do) and when they were around the age of yours, DH and I split up the afternoons, so one of us would be at home. We didn't think it was right to put the responsibility of baby sitting on our oldest. But, equally important, we didn't want the kids sitting around all afternoon watching TV or playing video games. With one of us at home, they could make plans with friends (e.g., to hang out at our house, play tennis, go for a bike ride, etc.). They could also get little jobs in the neighborhood -- e.g., dog-walking, which is far more lucrative than babysitting (our daughter actually bought an Apple watch with her dog-walking money). Or, they could read or come up with some project to entertain themselves --e.g., our sons repainted an old night table as a birthday gift for their sister. I realize we were fortunate to be able to have the flexibility in our work schedules, but, if you can swing it at all, OP, I would highly recommend that you consider this as an option.
Anonymous wrote:Do you know your neighbors, ones that are home most of the time?
I would leave my kids home at those ages for a few hours a day, for sure. We know a lot of neighbors.
The biggest issue isn't really safety for me, its that they will fight a lot. Will yours fight? Get them phones if they don't have them and require that they text you if playing with friends. I know a lot of people who say their kids have to stay inside when home alone, I wouldn't hold my kids to that at that age.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Basically never. They are not allowed to do nothing for huge chunks of time. A day or two here or there? Sure. But for weeks on end? No.
so at what age do you leave kids home without a sitter in the summer?
Depends on the kid, not the season, but they aren’t staying home all day,, multiple days in a row, ever.
so at 16 you still hire a sitter for kids? I mean at some point "kids" are left home alone. when is that point? Guidelines posted above suggest after age 13.
No, but I don't leave them home alone ALL DAY for MULTIPLE DAYS IN A ROW. Can't you see that? I said it twice.
I am not leaving town for the month, just going to work from 8-4.
So full-time working parent with a 16 yr old should hire a sitter so they aren't home alone from 8-4 during the summer?
Seriously question, at what age do kids not have a sitter in the summer?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really, OP, what you're talking about doing is having the older one being responsible for the younger one for three hours a day for the whole summer. And that's not cool. He's your responsibility, not his brother's.
This, unless he agrees to it and you pay him.
OP here we did this last summer. Sitter would leave around 2. So they were home for a few hours. By that time of day they are tired from being at the pool most of the day and just want to chill. Younger one watches TV while older one plays some video games. It's not like the older one is really "watching" his sibling.
Anonymous wrote:How old is the sitter?
If I were the sitter I would not feel comfortable just leaving the two kids home on their own like that. If it were my teen who was the babysitter, I would not allow them to accept the job.
And to the pp that said "Make sure they know a neighbor likely to be home in case of trouble, but it’s perfectly safe"--get out of here with that.
It's not your neighbor's responsibility. If it's "perfectly safe" there is absolutely no need to ever involve a neighbor.
Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn’t you just put them in camps or something? 13 is the age when I knew kids started looking at porn and smoking pot and this was in the 90s. There’s so much awful stuff going on now with kids and phones I don’t think such long chunks of unsupervised time is a good idea. And not really fair to either kid to make one watch the other for the whole summer. Bite the bullet and pay for some camps or a college student with a car who will take them places and keep them occupied and at least out of trouble.