Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's insane is not just that he did this... it's that years later, after being married to her, just had a kid (or two?) with her, and just secured a multi-million hosting gig of the 7PM prime time hour... he BRAGS ABOUT THIS ON TV! wtf

Way to re-victimize your ex wife and the children you have with her, you dirtbag.

This post is so weird. He was joking. He didn't do this. He was married when he started dating the producer/intern, whatever she was. It's not like she didn't know he had a wife and kids. She's not a victim.

The married Fox host was lusting after a kid in the office, so he decided to demobilize the kid's car so he could prey on her in the parking lot away from other colleagues. So charming, I am sure Fox lawyers, the News Corp board, and his ex wife loved hearing about this.

A kid? Was she underage? I’m curious.

Yes, a kid. No, she was not underage. Who do you think she was most likely to call for car trouble? Her dad. Why? Because she's a broke and single New Jersey kid working in Midtown Manhattan. It's also very likely she was still living with her parents in NJ. In this context, she's a kid who was preyed on by a much older married man at work.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone on here called the girl a kid, how is he not in trouble for her being underage?

Adult women do not have any agency according to many here.

I love how you guys try to coopt arguments without understanding the terms.

This guy disabled her car and then offered her a ride. She had agency to say yes or no to a ride, certainly. But do you think she would have made the same decision if she had all the facts? If she knew he let the air out of her tires would she have seen the offer of a ride home as a kind move from a coworker, or the beginning of a movie about a serial killer?

She was not a kid. But she was his subordinate at work and his chosen target. And you deciding that you don't have to address illegal and predatory behavior because one poster used the word kid colloquially instead of clinically is a very obvious PR smokescreen.

Very well said. I choose not to excuse workplace sexual harassment of interns by their superiors simply because the interns have reached the age of majority — and that’s not even taking into account his disabling her car to make her extra vulnerable. I hope he at least had the shred of decency to fix her flat tire(s).

Agree. Whether this story is true or not, she willingly engaged in an affair with a married man and her boss. He wasn’t that high up in Fox or important to have any type of power over her and make or break her career. One car ride did not victimize her or force her into an unwanted relationship. He left his wife for her,

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's insane is not just that he did this... it's that years later, after being married to her, just had a kid (or two?) with her, and just secured a multi-million hosting gig of the 7PM prime time hour... he BRAGS ABOUT THIS ON TV! wtf

Way to re-victimize your ex wife and the children you have with her, you dirtbag.

This post is so weird. He was joking. He didn't do this. He was married when he started dating the producer/intern, whatever she was. It's not like she didn't know he had a wife and kids. She's not a victim.

The married Fox host was lusting after a kid in the office, so he decided to demobilize the kid's car so he could prey on her in the parking lot away from other colleagues. So charming, I am sure Fox lawyers, the News Corp board, and his ex wife loved hearing about this.

A kid? Was she underage? I’m curious.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone on here called the girl a kid, how is he not in trouble for her being underage?

Adult women do not have any agency according to many here.

I love how you guys try to coopt arguments without understanding the terms.

This guy disabled her car and then offered her a ride. She had agency to say yes or no to a ride, certainly. But do you think she would have made the same decision if she had all the facts? If she knew he let the air out of her tires would she have seen the offer of a ride home as a kind move from a coworker, or the beginning of a movie about a serial killer?

She was not a kid. But she was his subordinate at work and his chosen target. And you deciding that you don't have to address illegal and predatory behavior because one poster used the word kid colloquially instead of clinically is a very obvious PR smokescreen.

Very well said. I choose not to excuse workplace sexual harassment of interns by their superiors simply because the interns have reached the age of majority — and that’s not even taking into account his disabling her car to make her extra vulnerable. I hope he at least had the shred of decency to fix her flat tire(s).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone on here called the girl a kid, how is he not in trouble for her being underage?

Adult women do not have any agency according to many here.

I love how you guys try to coopt arguments without understanding the terms.

This guy disabled her car and then offered her a ride. She had agency to say yes or no to a ride, certainly. But do you think she would have made the same decision if she had all the facts? If she knew he let the air out of her tires would she have seen the offer of a ride home as a kind move from a coworker, or the beginning of a movie about a serial killer?

She was not a kid. But she was his subordinate at work and his chosen target. And you deciding that you don't have to address illegal and predatory behavior because one poster used the word kid colloquially instead of clinically is a very obvious PR smokescreen.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone on here called the girl a kid, how is he not in trouble for her being underage?

Adult women do not have any agency according to many here.

I love how you guys try to coopt arguments without understanding the terms.

This guy disabled her car and then offered her a ride. She had agency to say yes or no to a ride, certainly. But do you think she would have made the same decision if she had all the facts? If she knew he let the air out of her tires would she have seen the offer of a ride home as a kind move from a coworker, or the beginning of a movie about a serial killer?

She was not a kid. But she was his subordinate at work and his chosen target. And you deciding that you don't have to address illegal and predatory behavior because one poster used the word kid colloquially instead of clinically is a very obvious PR smokescreen.

You don’t know what a colloquial is if you think the poster who referred to the woman as “kid” used it in such a way. It was used as a slur, nice try.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's insane is not just that he did this... it's that years later, after being married to her, just had a kid (or two?) with her, and just secured a multi-million hosting gig of the 7PM prime time hour... he BRAGS ABOUT THIS ON TV! wtf

Way to re-victimize your ex wife and the children you have with her, you dirtbag.

This post is so weird. He was joking. He didn't do this. He was married when he started dating the producer/intern, whatever she was. It's not like she didn't know he had a wife and kids. She's not a victim.

The married Fox host was lusting after a kid in the office, so he decided to demobilize the kid's car so he could prey on her in the parking lot away from other colleagues. So charming, I am sure Fox lawyers, the News Corp board, and his ex wife loved hearing about this.

He was joking.........

No he was not. Did you see his response when they asked if he had done it before? You can’t just sweep this under the rug and say he was joking. He’s a creep.

What was his answer? Has he done it before?

He laughed and said it works like a charm.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's insane is not just that he did this... it's that years later, after being married to her, just had a kid (or two?) with her, and just secured a multi-million hosting gig of the 7PM prime time hour... he BRAGS ABOUT THIS ON TV! wtf

Way to re-victimize your ex wife and the children you have with her, you dirtbag.

This post is so weird. He was joking. He didn't do this. He was married when he started dating the producer/intern, whatever she was. It's not like she didn't know he had a wife and kids. She's not a victim.

The married Fox host was lusting after a kid in the office, so he decided to demobilize the kid's car so he could prey on her in the parking lot away from other colleagues. So charming, I am sure Fox lawyers, the News Corp board, and his ex wife loved hearing about this.

He was joking.........

No he was not. Did you see his response when they asked if he had done it before? You can’t just sweep this under the rug and say he was joking. He’s a creep.

What was his answer? Has he done it before?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone on here called the girl a kid, how is he not in trouble for her being underage?

Adult women do not have any agency according to many here.

I love how you guys try to coopt arguments without understanding the terms.

This guy disabled her car and then offered her a ride. She had agency to say yes or no to a ride, certainly. But do you think she would have made the same decision if she had all the facts? If she knew he let the air out of her tires would she have seen the offer of a ride home as a kind move from a coworker, or the beginning of a movie about a serial killer?

She was not a kid. But she was his subordinate at work and his chosen target. And you deciding that you don't have to address illegal and predatory behavior because one poster used the word kid colloquially instead of clinically is a very obvious PR smokescreen.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's insane is not just that he did this... it's that years later, after being married to her, just had a kid (or two?) with her, and just secured a multi-million hosting gig of the 7PM prime time hour... he BRAGS ABOUT THIS ON TV! wtf

Way to re-victimize your ex wife and the children you have with her, you dirtbag.

This post is so weird. He was joking. He didn't do this. He was married when he started dating the producer/intern, whatever she was. It's not like she didn't know he had a wife and kids. She's not a victim.

The married Fox host was lusting after a kid in the office, so he decided to demobilize the kid's car so he could prey on her in the parking lot away from other colleagues. So charming, I am sure Fox lawyers, the News Corp board, and his ex wife loved hearing about this.

He was joking.........

No he was not. Did you see his response when they asked if he had done it before? You can’t just sweep this under the rug and say he was joking. He’s a creep.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone on here called the girl a kid, how is he not in trouble for her being underage?

Adult women do not have any agency according to many here.

I love how you guys try to coopt arguments without understanding the terms.

This guy disabled her car and then offered her a ride. She had agency to say yes or no to a ride, certainly. But do you think she would have made the same decision if she had all the facts? If she knew he let the air out of her tires would she have seen the offer of a ride home as a kind move from a coworker, or the beginning of a movie about a serial killer?

She was not a kid. But she was his subordinate at work and his chosen target. And you deciding that you don't have to address illegal and predatory behavior because one poster used the word kid colloquially instead of clinically is a very obvious PR smokescreen.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone on here called the girl a kid, how is he not in trouble for her being underage?

Adult women do not have any agency according to many here.

You all are seriously enamored with this homewrecker.