Anonymous wrote:Children thrive with enforceable limits. They should try it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh yes! But most of it requires more money-
-Smaller class sizes
-Reducing the responsibilities of teachers. Right now they have so much paperwork, documents, 504/IEP meetings. It’s too much.
-Improving teacher-student relationships. Private schools have teacher mentors, family groups, picnics and events to create a “family like” environment.
-textbooks!!! Please for the love of god
-required reading
-more rigorous course work
-less pre-programmed curriculum. Greater flexibility and trust in teachers.
-higher quality teachers
Not really sure that’s the issue. Private school teachers aren’t certified and generally don’t have a solid training in pedagogy. Public schools also pay more than private.
Depends on the private. I left public school teaching and now work in a private high school. We are required to maintain state certification. We also get to pick and attend PDs once a month. I’m getting about 5X the development I got in the public system, and I get to pick what is most beneficial to me.
I’m also observed 8 times a year as opposed to the twice a year in the public system. My lesson plans must be posted by Sunday evening, whereas I didn’t need lesson plans at all in public.
I work harder now and I’m held to higher expectations. The payoff is I’m HAPPY. I am treated far better at the private. They pay may be lower, but the professional respect makes up for it.
From my experience, the one thing publics can learn from private is how to effectively use an administration. My public admin’s main purpose was to play “gotcha,” and none of them spent a second thinking how they could support the teaching staff.
(Note: this is my experience. I’m sure there are privates that don’t operate nearly as well as mine.)
Do you have more planning time in private?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh yes! But most of it requires more money-
-Smaller class sizes
-Reducing the responsibilities of teachers. Right now they have so much paperwork, documents, 504/IEP meetings. It’s too much.
-Improving teacher-student relationships. Private schools have teacher mentors, family groups, picnics and events to create a “family like” environment.
-textbooks!!! Please for the love of god
-required reading
-more rigorous course work
-less pre-programmed curriculum. Greater flexibility and trust in teachers.
-higher quality teachers
Not really sure that’s the issue. Private school teachers aren’t certified and generally don’t have a solid training in pedagogy. Public schools also pay more than private.
Depends on the private. I left public school teaching and now work in a private high school. We are required to maintain state certification. We also get to pick and attend PDs once a month. I’m getting about 5X the development I got in the public system, and I get to pick what is most beneficial to me.
I’m also observed 8 times a year as opposed to the twice a year in the public system. My lesson plans must be posted by Sunday evening, whereas I didn’t need lesson plans at all in public.
I work harder now and I’m held to higher expectations. The payoff is I’m HAPPY. I am treated far better at the private. They pay may be lower, but the professional respect makes up for it.
From my experience, the one thing publics can learn from private is how to effectively use an administration. My public admin’s main purpose was to play “gotcha,” and none of them spent a second thinking how they could support the teaching staff.
(Note: this is my experience. I’m sure there are privates that don’t operate nearly as well as mine.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh yes! But most of it requires more money-
-Smaller class sizes
-Reducing the responsibilities of teachers. Right now they have so much paperwork, documents, 504/IEP meetings. It’s too much.
-Improving teacher-student relationships. Private schools have teacher mentors, family groups, picnics and events to create a “family like” environment.
-textbooks!!! Please for the love of god
-required reading
-more rigorous course work
-less pre-programmed curriculum. Greater flexibility and trust in teachers.
-higher quality teachers
Not really sure that’s the issue. Private school teachers aren’t certified and generally don’t have a solid training in pedagogy. Public schools also pay more than private.
Anonymous wrote:Sure. They learn that rich people set up society to benefit them as they dodge their taxes and poor people get some sort of mad max hell scape where they do Thunder dome in the hallways. Accurate enough?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went to “bad” public schools, but looking at the NCS Instagram page, it just looks so idyllic. The nature activities, arts etc.
Are you willing to pay enough taxes to give every public school a campus like NCS, the resources to go on field trips to engage in nature activities or to performances, and the number of extra schools needed to cut class sizes in half?
I am, personally.
Anonymous wrote:I think privates could learn a thing or two about accountability from public. Since there are few objective measures, people often fail to see that they're missing out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have taught at both and sent my kids to both, and I think both could absolutely learn from each other.
For public schools, I found that chasing test scores meant that so much of the joy and meaning went away. Private schools have the luxury to focus on longer texts and thematic units and just having kids read and respond without anatomizing it into author's purpose, etc. (I taught English and history.) In contrast, though, private schools need to get a clue about new practices in education and not just teach the way my parents probably learned, with 10 reading questions each night and teacher-led discussions (they both have their place, but that's all that seems to happen in my child's school.)
This is an actually useful and non-snide response!
I think privates could learn a thing or two about accountability from public. Since there are few objective measures, people often fail to see that they're missing out.
I think any school taking vouchers should be required to administer state standardized tests.
I love this idea. And any school taking public money has to have a student population that reflects the demographics of the local population.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have taught at both and sent my kids to both, and I think both could absolutely learn from each other.
For public schools, I found that chasing test scores meant that so much of the joy and meaning went away. Private schools have the luxury to focus on longer texts and thematic units and just having kids read and respond without anatomizing it into author's purpose, etc. (I taught English and history.) In contrast, though, private schools need to get a clue about new practices in education and not just teach the way my parents probably learned, with 10 reading questions each night and teacher-led discussions (they both have their place, but that's all that seems to happen in my child's school.)
This is an actually useful and non-snide response!
I think privates could learn a thing or two about accountability from public. Since there are few objective measures, people often fail to see that they're missing out.
I think any school taking vouchers should be required to administer state standardized tests.
Anonymous wrote:Having experience with both, I think public can learn from how private schools create community (and I recognize that not all privates may be great at this and that some publics may better than others). I wish the communications from our public school weren't so sterile, for instance.