Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My children have my name. I birthed them, I raise them. Are women still chattel? There is no reason for a woman to take her partner's name. There is no reason for a child to receive the father's name.
That train has left the station, though. OP already took her deceased first husband's last name, and the child also has that name.
In this case, it's trickier because OP's choices are:
1) Revert to her birth name, leave son's name as is to honor bio dad
2) Revert to her birth name, change son's name to her birth name as well
3) Switch to new husband's name, leave son's name as bio dad
4) Switch to new husband's name, change son's name as well
If it were me, personally, I'd choose Option 1. Yes, having 3 names in a family is annoying but it's not the end of the world in 2022. However, I am aware of how hard blended families are, so I'd be hedging against a future divorce and not wanting yet another name change down the line.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All of our adopted children had the last names of their biological parents before we adopted them. I honestly don’t see how this is different. But either choice is fine, OP. I’m just voting for all taking your new husband’s name at the adoption (not the wedding).
Well in one case the biological parent is someone who you were married to and chose to conceive this child with. In the other case they’re essentially strangers who you have no preexisting connection or loyalty to.
DP. I don’t see it as a loyalty issue to either father, biological or adopted. My feeling is that it would be better for the boy to have his adopted father’s last name for practical and bonding reasons.
Anonymous wrote:What would be the point of keeping his biological father’s last name? Who benefits from that? Wouldn’t it be easier on the boy to have the same name as his new dad? He’s only six.
Anonymous wrote:Your new husband can take your and your son's last name. You can all change your last names to something different. Or everybody keeps their last name.
Anonymous wrote:OP, I personally think you shouldn’t change your sons name. But mostly wanted to say how sorry I am for your devastating loss and happy that you have found love.
Anonymous wrote:My children have my name. I birthed them, I raise them. Are women still chattel? There is no reason for a woman to take her partner's name. There is no reason for a child to receive the father's name.
Anonymous wrote:My children have my name. I birthed them, I raise them. Are women still chattel? There is no reason for a woman to take her partner's name. There is no reason for a child to receive the father's name.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All of our adopted children had the last names of their biological parents before we adopted them. I honestly don’t see how this is different. But either choice is fine, OP. I’m just voting for all taking your new husband’s name at the adoption (not the wedding).
Well in one case the biological parent is someone who you were married to and chose to conceive this child with. In the other case they’re essentially strangers who you have no preexisting connection or loyalty to.
Anonymous wrote:All of our adopted children had the last names of their biological parents before we adopted them. I honestly don’t see how this is different. But either choice is fine, OP. I’m just voting for all taking your new husband’s name at the adoption (not the wedding).