Anonymous wrote:I don't blame them. Coastal elitists should share the burden that border states get hammered with. Blue states want the policies so gotta pitch in to deal with the consequences.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Look at the size of Texas.
Look at the size of the district.
Of course Texas has the room. If they need the money, they should absolutely receive federal help. Money for every immigrant taken in.
Or we could just enforce our borders. I don’t see why Texas is expected to take in migrants but not DC.
PP you replied to. We ALL agree on that, but the border is one of the longest in the world and just impossible to secure. High walls were possibly a good idea, but you've seen how easily people can still get across, and how much of it we'd need to build and maintain. Plus, there are conservation areas there, and bodies of water.
We need to act on ALL the options we have: border enforcement is only one of our tools. Being nasty to the illegal immigrants that have been in the country for years and paid taxes is unnecessarily punitive, when we've all benefited from their labor. So the answer has to depend on which illegal immigrant we're talking about, how long they've been there and how they've comported themselves.
Illegal immigrants in good standing should be encouraged to settle in all states that have the room, with subsidies for those states.
- legal immigrant.
Or we could just not let these people enter our country to begin with.
What part of long border/impossible to secure do you not understand?
Do you want to talk to Border Patrol in Texas? They'll tell you about it.
This is a total cop-out. Of course, we will never stop 100% of the illegal immigrants, but did you see the road blocks put up by big business and their Congressional BFFs when Trump tried to enforce border laws? And even with all of the pushback, he lowered crossings substantially. We currently have 200,000 crossers each MONTH (the size of a moderate city).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Look at the size of Texas.
Look at the size of the district.
Of course Texas has the room. If they need the money, they should absolutely receive federal help. Money for every immigrant taken in.
Or we could just enforce our borders. I don’t see why Texas is expected to take in migrants but not DC.
PP you replied to. We ALL agree on that, but the border is one of the longest in the world and just impossible to secure. High walls were possibly a good idea, but you've seen how easily people can still get across, and how much of it we'd need to build and maintain. Plus, there are conservation areas there, and bodies of water.
We need to act on ALL the options we have: border enforcement is only one of our tools. Being nasty to the illegal immigrants that have been in the country for years and paid taxes is unnecessarily punitive, when we've all benefited from their labor. So the answer has to depend on which illegal immigrant we're talking about, how long they've been there and how they've comported themselves.
Illegal immigrants in good standing should be encouraged to settle in all states that have the room, with subsidies for those states.
- legal immigrant.
Or we could just not let these people enter our country to begin with.
What part of long border/impossible to secure do you not understand?
Do you want to talk to Border Patrol in Texas? They'll tell you about it.
Anonymous wrote:Well, the restaurant owners I know will be happy, they can’t find anyone to work in the kitchen.
The crab industry will be happy, they need pickers.
The agricultural industry will be happy, they need people too.
We have a labor shortage people.
Anonymous wrote:We should just annex a part of Texas, call it Texico, and let them have it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Look at the size of Texas.
Look at the size of the district.
Of course Texas has the room. If they need the money, they should absolutely receive federal help. Money for every immigrant taken in.
The size of a state does not matter. The amount of habitable land does. Which is why these people congregate and overcrowd areas of wherever they end up - they go where the resources are.
Anonymous wrote:I don't blame them. Coastal elitists should share the burden that border states get hammered with. Blue states want the policies so gotta pitch in to deal with the consequences.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Immigration is the big loser for Democrats. For some reason Democrats vastly overestimate support for illegal border crossings as well as a very flawed, and gamed, asylum program. Trump literally won due to Democrat mishandling of the border and democrats are now looking to lose the midterms and next presidential election despite rising wages and good economy.
Republicans have no fix for immigration just like they had no fix for healthcare. They have only divisive and dishonest rhetoric.
Anonymous wrote:Immigration is the big loser for Democrats. For some reason Democrats vastly overestimate support for illegal border crossings as well as a very flawed, and gamed, asylum program. Trump literally won due to Democrat mishandling of the border and democrats are now looking to lose the midterms and next presidential election despite rising wages and good economy.