Anonymous wrote:I was very much NOT cool, and was surprised to have daughters who are. I will focus on my oldest, because that's when it surprised me (after her, I figured I just produce cool kids, like some people produce lefties). I learned she was cool in 1st grade when we were walking down the hallway in her school at the end of the day and a 5th grader said goodbye to her from down the hall. How did a 5th grader know her?! Who was that girl?! "That's my friend."
- not super sensitive. You got the piece of paper that's someone else's favorite color? DD will trade so you can have it, no problem and doesn't care that she got navy blue or dark brown (colors hard to color on).
- she's kind in meaningful ways . You don't have anywhere to sit because there's no room? She'll get everyone to smush over to make room for you. You were in a rush this morning and don't have lunch? She'll share hers.
- she's confident deep in her soul. Walking into a room of kids she doesn't know, doesn't phase her. She'd march right in and walk up to some kid and say "You're wearing my favorite color! You love purple too?" and in ten minutes you'd think they'd been friends for three years the way they're giggling together.
- she can defuse tense situations by using humor. she could stop bullying, smooth over embarrassing moments, etc.
- she has a couple of cool skills - she is very good at art and if someone was sad she'd sometimes draw them a picture. she's very good at imitating people and would do imitations of people's moms, a sub who was old and from the deep South, etc. people like people who can do tricks.
We were poor and sometimes her clothes looked poor. At one point her backpack was held together with duct tape. So it wasn't being rich or having a lot of fancy stuff. I think the younger girls, while also confident and having a lot of the same qualities listed above that the oldest has, also benefitted by being related to her. "Oh, you're R's little sister? She's cool, so you're cool too." They were popular by association.
Anonymous wrote:My DS is in 4th and there is definitely a cool group, particularly for girls. For the girls, it has nothing to do with their parents or social engineering. They're the girls who appear to be aware of their looks (not in a sexual or precocious way or anything but in more a groomed fashion way) sooner and have grasped group dynamic skills faster. I think it's mainly the group dynamics skills. I personally was late bloomer to those skills and it showed.
For the boys, it's mainly the sports bros. My own DS is not a sports bro but he's totally fine anyway.
While I am aware of this through his teacher and the school counselor (DS has ADHD and has contact with her), we're not at all concerned with it. It's all good.
Anonymous wrote:Parents and social engineering.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Parents and social engineering.
This is the answer. Although, my kids' school does not really have cool/popular to the extent others do. I think it has something to do with the fact that it is very, very diverse. The kids are (not perfect but) pretty accepting of each other.
However, I participate in this actively. For two reasons:
1. I like a certain group of moms. We became friends in K, our kids became friends, and now we're all becoming "family friends" which is lovely and a great way to grow up IMHO.
2. This kid group is somewhat nerdy. That's who I am, that's who my kids are, and I think that's the way for them to have the social support they need.
In a different school these kids may be considered dorky or unpopular, but I'd say even if popularity exists to some extent, they are close to the top. Idk why.
In case anyone is wondering, we are not UMC, I'd say solidly MC. We all work.
Anonymous wrote:There's a heavy race/class component to this in our ES right now. Most of the kids don't seem that concerned yet or overly cliquish, but there is one group of girls that is playing with ranking/excluding others, defining themselves as a group and calling themselves "popular." I harbor no ill will-- they're just kids. But it's certainly notable that they are all of a certain class and virtually all of a certain race. I don't think this is even typical at our school, but it seems to have taken root in one year's cohort.
To answer the question about my school when I was that age, I think it was 1) preternatural social awareness (used for both good and ill), 2) genuine confidence, and 3) looks as a distant, but still significant, third. I remember there being 4 girls that were the solidly popular girls in the class (with 2-3 more on the periphery), and 3 of the 4 were quite pretty, but the ~Queen Bee just wasn't, really. Athletics didn't come into it at all, as I recall. There wasn't much correlation with stage of puberty, either.
As for the group at my kid's school, at least in her grade, I genuinely see no other connection, no other shared attributes or distinctions but race and class. I also don't know to what extent other kids actually consider them popular, though. I think their behavior/self-definition has had some influence, maybe slightly raised their social status on average, but the whole thing is probably ignored completely by half or more of the other kids.
Anonymous wrote:Do any of you remember when you were in school? It's not a public vs. private school thing, there were cool kids and regular kids (even back in the OLD days!).
As to what makes cool kids cool might depend on what the school culture is like but in general these kids have charisma and confidence.