Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC is putting in bike lanes on Connecticut Avenue, one in each direction. While this may seem like an attractive idea, the rush hour carrying capacity of Conn. Ave. will be cut from 4 lanes down to 2 lanes. DC just assumes that the traffic will just go away, or maybe MD commuters will all switch to those little Lime scooters. More likely, Connecticut will be gridlocked several hours a day, with more traffic diverting onto Reno Rd, Porter St., etc. trying to find a way to or from downtown. Nice.
Poor Upper NW and MD drivers. Won't someone think of the drivers?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there a line in the budget somewhere about stopping roving gangs of 14-year olds from driving ATVs down the middle of Georgia Avenue?
The spandex crowd is at least as bad as the roving ATV gangs. The big difference is the spandex crowd is made up of lawyers and judges while of course the ATV crowd is poor black kids. Guess which group gets the green light to terrorize society?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there a line in the budget somewhere about stopping roving gangs of 14-year olds from driving ATVs down the middle of Georgia Avenue?
The spandex crowd is at least as bad as the roving ATV gangs. The big difference is the spandex crowd is made up of lawyers and judges while of course the ATV crowd is poor black kids. Guess which group gets the green light to terrorize society?
God your "cyclists in spandex are a menace" schtick is getting old. I recognize you from so many threads already. No matter how many times you say it, it doesn't get any funnier or any more true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there a line in the budget somewhere about stopping roving gangs of 14-year olds from driving ATVs down the middle of Georgia Avenue?
The spandex crowd is at least as bad as the roving ATV gangs. The big difference is the spandex crowd is made up of lawyers and judges while of course the ATV crowd is poor black kids. Guess which group gets the green light to terrorize society?
Anonymous wrote:Is there a line in the budget somewhere about stopping roving gangs of 14-year olds from driving ATVs down the middle of Georgia Avenue?
Anonymous wrote:Is there a line in the budget somewhere about stopping roving gangs of 14-year olds from driving ATVs down the middle of Georgia Avenue?
Anonymous wrote:Really expensive bike/pedestrian bridges!
$18.5 million to build one connecting RFK to Kingman Island
$21 million to build one connecting Barry Farm to the Anacostia Metro
For comparison, the Federal Highway Administration says such bridges normally cost between $1 million and $5 million
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It would be nice if DC re-striped the crosswalks near the DCPS that my kids attend. The crosswalks are so faded that drivers can't see them.
Drivers here don't respect crosswalks, painted or not.
We need many more raised crosswalks. Crosswalk on a speed bump basically.
Raised crosswalks are great. They should be at every intersection near a school and at many other locations. For folks in AU Park, there are several raised crosswalks on Van Ness St. near Turtle Park.
For years, the DC government has refused to consider traffic calming on streets that have a higher classification than "local." (Van Ness is in a higher "collector" category.). Raised crosswalks seem to be one measure that DDOT will install. Vision Zero should not mean "Action Zero." DC needs to install many more raised crosswalks and other devices to improve pedestrian safety, and to do it soon.
Anonymous wrote:Is there a line in the budget somewhere about stopping roving gangs of 14-year olds from driving ATVs down the middle of Georgia Avenue?
Anonymous wrote:The cost per use of D.C.'s bike infrastructure must be astronomical.
The city must have spent many hundreds of millions of dollars on bike lanes, capital bikeshare, etc. How many people regularly ride in the city? 500? 1000?
It would be cheaper for the city to pay each of those people $10,000 to ride the bus (and paying them is probably the only way they'd agree to ride the bus).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It would be nice if DC re-striped the crosswalks near the DCPS that my kids attend. The crosswalks are so faded that drivers can't see them.
Drivers here don't respect crosswalks, painted or not.
We need many more raised crosswalks. Crosswalk on a speed bump basically.
Anonymous wrote:$9.4 million to buy 170 new speed cameras, despite D.C. already having the largest police force on a per capita basis in the county.
What if we had all the cops....enforce traffic laws?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC is putting in bike lanes on Connecticut Avenue, one in each direction. While this may seem like an attractive idea, the rush hour carrying capacity of Conn. Ave. will be cut from 4 lanes down to 2 lanes. DC just assumes that the traffic will just go away, or maybe MD commuters will all switch to those little Lime scooters. More likely, Connecticut will be gridlocked several hours a day, with more traffic diverting onto Reno Rd, Porter St., etc. trying to find a way to or from downtown. Nice.
Poor Upper NW and MD drivers. Won't someone think of the drivers?
We need to plan for where the traffic will be diverted, I am thinking os much of the drivers, but of the kids who walk along Reno/34th Street to Much, Hearst, Eaton and several other schools. I'm thinking of people who cross or ride their bikes on Albemarle or Porter, and the folks who live on narrow streets who will find that Waze is diverting commuters all the time from the gridlocked Connecticut arterial. What about their safety? Slogans and wishful thinking are no substitute for real traffic planning.