Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[…]Bottom line is the average age of these old white justices is 80. And they're racist, and they're terrified. 👏🏼

Don’t sell them short. They’re also traitors to their country, misogynists and would do anything to hurt Democrats and make the country worse.

Indeed- they already did that on Jan. 6, 2021

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have to admit that I did not watch yesterday but I am surprised how unimpressed by her I am. There is a lack of substance with her answers. I believe she is qualified and will be approved but I’m just not impressed with what I am seeing.

There’s a lack of substance to your post. I think you’re certainly qualified to post, of course, but I’m just not impressed. No quotes, no examples, no cogent critiques of specific things that were said, or even of specific judicial decisions. Since you didn’t watch the proceedings, what exactly is informing your unimpressive opinions?

According to the time of that post, maybe twenty minutes of today’s proceedings?

Anonymous wrote:I have to admit that I did not watch yesterday but I am surprised how unimpressed by her I am. There is a lack of substance with her answers. I believe she is qualified and will be approved but I’m just not impressed with what I am seeing.

There’s a lack of substance to your post. I think you’re certainly qualified to post, of course, but I’m just not impressed. No quotes, no examples, no cogent critiques of specific things that were said, or even of specific judicial decisions. Since you didn’t watch the proceedings, what exactly is informing your unimpressive opinions?

Anonymous wrote:[…]Bottom line is the average age of these old white justices is 80. And they're racist, and they're terrified. 👏🏼

Don’t sell them short. They’re also traitors to their country, misogynists and would do anything to hurt Democrats and make the country worse.

11:15 pp These mofos trying to get her to "agree" with their rhetoric. Example: Senator John Comyn's lead in was lennngtthyyyy. He, like, Pence tries to get her to agree or disagree 1. "Politicians wear robes" duh yes, Republican justices wear their party on the sleeve of their robes. Dems too. Will she be any different? Kind of the pot calling the kettle black. Same sex marriage: he tries the trickery again. No where in the constitution does it state marriage is between a man/woman. Both agree. Then he asks if religion is mentioned in the first amendment. What's your point old man? He's reaching so hard on. His entire word vomit was about how vilified whites feel that they can only express their racism in "whispers" at home. WTF

He further poses the Booker case and how that decision went against the rule of Stare Decisis: Stare Decisis means “to stand by things decided” in Latin. When a court faces a legal argument, if a previous court has ruled on the same or a closely related issue, then the court will make their decision in alignment with the previous court's decision.

She teaches him about the new guidelines which allow a range of influence in judicial decisions. In other words, in light of systemic racism, equal rights = human rights means ratification or flexibility strictly within the range of constitutional law. He cuts her off! They don't want to hear her answers. They want her to be like Barrett and not answer any question that might negatively influence the votes. Brown Jackson has answered every question. She is so much smarter than them in degrees, experience, and life!

Bottom line is the average age of these old white justices is 80. And they're racist, and they're terrified. 👏🏼

I cannot watch as it is truly making me wish I had the power to zap gressley, graham, et al off the face of our galaxy. It is shameful!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'd like to see a non-lawyer on the court eventually, and if not, definitely not someone from an Ivy.

You already got that with Barrett.

🔥🔥🔥

Go senator Whitehouse!

Did anyone else want to reach through the TV and punch Cornyn right in the face?

Why do GOP senators not let Judge Brown finish her answer? This is so disrespectful...they want to just listen to themselves. Mansplaining is alive in GOP.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have to admit that I did not watch yesterday but I am surprised how unimpressed by her I am. There is a lack of substance with her answers. I believe she is qualified and will be approved but I’m just not impressed with what I am seeing.

You are an idiot. It's a confirmation hearing. She isn't going to say anything, just like the other Justices didn't say anything of real substance. Why would you open yourself up to that? Read her opinions if you want substance. She has more experience than anyone on the court combined. She's written over 600 opinions. Knock yourself out.

It is not worth it to try to debate someone who eats up all the pablum Fox News feeds them.

Anonymous wrote:I have to admit that I did not watch yesterday but I am surprised how unimpressed by her I am. There is a lack of substance with her answers. I believe she is qualified and will be approved but I’m just not impressed with what I am seeing.

You are an idiot. It's a confirmation hearing. She isn't going to say anything, just like the other Justices didn't say anything of real substance. Why would you open yourself up to that? Read her opinions if you want substance. She has more experience than anyone on the court combined. She's written over 600 opinions. Knock yourself out.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blackburn herself is also a very recent beneficiary of affirmative action, since she’s only on the Senate Judiciary Committee because everyone complained so loudly about it not having any women on the Republican side.

She is as dumb as an F'ing brick.

Tennessean here. She's an embarrassment to our state. But then again the entire state is embarrassing.

Anonymous wrote:Blackburn herself is also a very recent beneficiary of affirmative action, since she’s only on the Senate Judiciary Committee because everyone complained so loudly about it not having any women on the Republican side.

She is as dumb as an F'ing brick. The Rs had her ask about CRT.

Cringe- worthy = watching old white men asking KBJ stupid questions. KBJ is so calm that Rs can't paint her as an "angry black woman".

Blackburn herself is also a very recent beneficiary of affirmative action, since she’s only on the Senate Judiciary Committee because everyone complained so loudly about it not having any women on the Republican side.