Anonymous wrote:There are certainly rude families traveling, that is true. But NO AIRLINE should be charging families extra for a 3 year old to sit next to their parent.
Do you want to sit next to an unattended young child during a flight? I certainly do not. It definitely does seem airlines should accommodate them. But they won't, because they don't give a sh*t about customer service.
So once again: this is the airline's fault. They can SEE HOW OLD EVERYONE IS WHO BOOKS TICKETS. Having young children seated away from parents, and then begging people to move, should not be allowed at all. Either they need to take the responsibility to move GROWN UPS around, or they need to block some seats off for this scenario.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We could fix this if Congress just passed a law that required airlines to provide pre-booking of seats to families with a child under the age of 13 at no-cost. There should not be a fee for a family to select their seats in economy class so that they can ensure they sit together.
Of course, Congress wouldn't need to resort to this if airlines just had a modicum of responsibility toward their customers. If it's not explicitly legislated, they will degrade service and quality in the pursuit of another buck.
As long as this doesn't give families the first shot at aisle seats. Families should be able to choose window and middles together.
Anonymous wrote:We could fix this if Congress just passed a law that required airlines to provide pre-booking of seats to families with a child under the age of 13 at no-cost. There should not be a fee for a family to select their seats in economy class so that they can ensure they sit together.
Of course, Congress wouldn't need to resort to this if airlines just had a modicum of responsibility toward their customers. If it's not explicitly legislated, they will degrade service and quality in the pursuit of another buck.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t like how the airlines nickel and dime everything these days and I don’t think you should have to pay extra to sit together. But as it is - if that’s the way it is - that’s the way it is. You don’t have to get up for a family to sit together but I like his suggestion to ask for an upgrade to do it.
Although the person asked to move shouldn’t have to ask for an upgrade — the airline should offer it, if it’s available, in appreciation for the passenger’s flexibility.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t like how the airlines nickel and dime everything these days and I don’t think you should have to pay extra to sit together. But as it is - if that’s the way it is - that’s the way it is. You don’t have to get up for a family to sit together but I like his suggestion to ask for an upgrade to do it.
Anonymous wrote:I fly later this week to the UK with my 14-year-old. The airline has already changed our flights twice and we don't go to the airport until Friday. In addition to leaving 3 hours earlier on Friday, we are no longer sitting together on the flight back, since our original flight, with seats together that we paid for, is cancelled and no longer on the schedule. We are now in middle seats in different rows. The 14-year-old can obviously fly solo so we will cope, but if she were younger, I would be even more unhappy.
Airlines separated families prior to the pandemic (I have had it happen with aircraft changes and for no apparent reason, all times when we had assigned seats well in advance) and with the instability of flight schedules I bet it happens even more now. While I completely agree that the blame for this falls on the airlines, Mr/Ms Bulkhead and the columnist might consider that this problem is often not the result of "poor planning".
It still wouldn’t make it the responsibility of other passengers to deal with. The airline should be handling this.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't read the article but I have seen the issue come up on various boards. In my opinion, being a family or traveling with kids doesn't entitle you to special treatment. When I travel with my family I pay to pick seats, early check-in, extra space - whatever I think we might need. If you're not willing to pay for that then you can't afford the trip. Other travelers have also paid for those services and they don't owe you anything.
Your thought process is flawed. Only five years ago, these were basic accommodations part of customer experience. Not something you paid extra for. The fact that you think paying extra for them is acceptable is bizarre.
Anonymous wrote:I can't read the article but I have seen the issue come up on various boards. In my opinion, being a family or traveling with kids doesn't entitle you to special treatment. When I travel with my family I pay to pick seats, early check-in, extra space - whatever I think we might need. If you're not willing to pay for that then you can't afford the trip. Other travelers have also paid for those services and they don't owe you anything.
Anonymous wrote:This is on the airline. There should be no situation where a small child is seated away from their parent. But that doesn’t entitle them to a premium seat. Put them in the back with the rest of the families who didn’t want to pay for seats.