Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It depends. High risk like asthma, obese or like going through chemo?
The teacher can lose weight if being fat is the issue.
If it is another issue, they can stay home. our kids have gone through two years of this B.S....it enough.
Anonymous wrote:As subject says, would that change your decision when it comes to your child masking or not? Every parents in the class know about that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It depends. High risk like asthma, obese or like going through chemo?
The teacher can lose weight if being fat is the issue.
If it is another issue, they can stay home. our kids have gone through two years of this B.S....it enough.
Anonymous wrote:It depends. High risk like asthma, obese or like going through chemo?
Anonymous wrote:I would but we are respectful of others health needs. This is along the lines of would you give up your seat on a crowded train so an elderly person could sit down. A lot of people don’t and just sit there. My kids are being raised to offer the elderly person their seat.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Masks work better to protect others than to protect the wearer. Theoretically, an N95 should protect the wearer if it is correctly fitted, but the smallest gap could allow infection. Wearing a mask seems a small inconvenience compared to someone else’s safety. Since you know they are high risk, why wouldn’t you continue to mask around them?
If they're that high risk, they shouldn't be in the classroom. So, it doesn't figure into my decisions.
Hopefully they will quit and your kid will go without a teacher.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The teacher is wearing a mask and likely is vaccinated. She/He will be fine.
Yea that doesn't work that easily for people who are high risk. And most high risk people has their booster over 5 months ago so any benefit they got from it has waned
High risk people can get shots/boosters more frequently.
My high risk teen had 3 shots (March '21, April '21, Sept. '21) before the booster was even released. He got his booster and will be eligible for another in May. We will evaluate if we do another with his doctor at that time.
You do realize there are no studies on taking 4-5-6-7 shots, right?
There are studies from Israel on 4th shots.
Separately, the idea of giving immunocompromised individuals more vaccine shots is not new. That’s why it was so ridiculous it took the FDA and CDC so long to authorize 3rd shots.
No, its not new and as someone immunocompromised I am enough of a human guinea pig for all the new medications that haven't been tested with the vaccine so no way I'm going to be a human guinea pig for this vaccine which has been proven to be useful at best a few weeks to a few months for hospitalization only. Many initial studies haven't been fully accurate as they don't include enough people over a long enough time period. They need to stop calling these vaccines and call them a preventative mediation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would but we are respectful of others health needs. This is along the lines of would you give up your seat on a crowded train so an elderly person could sit down. A lot of people don’t and just sit there. My kids are being raised to offer the elderly person their seat.
Ok, sounds like you have a plan that works out for your family.
Stop complaining about things when you are either part of the solution or problem. You are the problem. That poster is a solution.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would but we are respectful of others health needs. This is along the lines of would you give up your seat on a crowded train so an elderly person could sit down. A lot of people don’t and just sit there. My kids are being raised to offer the elderly person their seat.
Ok, sounds like you have a plan that works out for your family.