Anonymous wrote:Why is OP triggered by the fact that some people choose to subscribe to a certain publication for recipes?
Anonymous wrote:Kitch'n has better recipes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because a lot of foo foo high brown pseudointellectuals in DC and the surrounding region subscribe to crap publications like NYT.
This exactly! My boss always talks about the NYT recipes and it's for this very reason. I agree with OP. Literally every single on I try is mediocre at best and often a major fail. And trust me, I can cook!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because a lot of foo foo high brown pseudointellectuals in DC and the surrounding region subscribe to crap publications like NYT.
This exactly! My boss always talks about the NYT recipes and it's for this very reason. I agree with OP. Literally every single on I try is mediocre at best and often a major fail. And trust me, I can cook!
Anonymous wrote:I have a subscription to the paper and the cooking comes with it. I just find it easier to use than when you Google a recipe and you get those blog recipes with 300 pop up ads and have to read a whole novel about how the food brings the blogger back to her grandmother's house, etc...
Also, the comments on the NYT recipes are super helpful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a subscription to the paper and the cooking comes with it. I just find it easier to use than when you Google a recipe and you get those blog recipes with 300 pop up ads and have to read a whole novel about how the food brings the blogger back to her grandmother's house, etc...
Also, the comments on the NYT recipes are super helpful.
Yep. I don’t want a recipe where the comments/reviews are all just “5 stars! I love your blog!” I want real reviews and tips from experienced home cooks who have actually made the recipe. I would not pay for the cooking app if not for that.
Yes - the NYT comments are great.
This is a really funny and spot-on satire about the NYT cooking comments: https://medium.com/@mrtoddlevin/reader-comments-for-the-new-york-times-homestyle-spaghetti-carbonara-recipe-2c3ab6ede095
Anonymous wrote:Most people I know have a NYT cooking subscription, so you’re the one who is weird, OP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a subscription to the paper and the cooking comes with it. I just find it easier to use than when you Google a recipe and you get those blog recipes with 300 pop up ads and have to read a whole novel about how the food brings the blogger back to her grandmother's house, etc...
Also, the comments on the NYT recipes are super helpful.
Yep. I don’t want a recipe where the comments/reviews are all just “5 stars! I love your blog!” I want real reviews and tips from experienced home cooks who have actually made the recipe. I would not pay for the cooking app if not for that.
Yes - the NYT comments are great.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's weird. Who pays for recipes? No one I know. They are all online for free.
Are you kidding? Finding a good recipe online is almost impossible. SEO means you get all those spammy terrible recipes from AllRecipes amateur cooks and hacks.
FoodNetwork can be okay but are pretty boring. .
Anonymous wrote:When people request recipes here, links to NYT Cooking recipes dominate threads. I don’t know anyone in real life who subscribes or recommends NYTC as a go to for recipes. Why would anyone pay for a subscription when there are endless free recipes and cooking sites online?
I tried NYTC at the beginning of the pandemic and found the recipes pretty mediocre. I saw no reason to subscribe.
Am I the only one who finds it curious that people always link recipes behind paywalls here?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I recommend NYT recipes all the time. It is my absolute #1 go-to for recipes, especially because my favorite cookbook author is employed there. I am absolutely a bleeding heart liberal NYT reader, but I hitch onto my aunt's NYT cooking subscription.
Melissa Clark?
Mark Bittman? Alison Roman?