Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The main issue is the way it was done. Biden announcing the nomination will only be a black woman is what is damaging. She will always be seen as the affirmative action choice, and he did her a great disservice handling it that way.

I will speak on behalf of all brilliant and more than qualified AAs in the US. You are not in her league and she isn’t thinking about you or your narrow beliefs at all. She is too busy reaping the fruits and rewards of her, gift of superior intellect, hard work and excellence.

Life’s not always fair and yes some people really are smarter than others. And you and everyone else in the room knows it and these people often aren’t in the package you think they should be.

You are very welcome.

I’m the one you are replying to. I am an AA Woman you fool. You do not speak for all of us.

NP. And you speak for very few, or the ones closely aligned to the Clarence Thomas' school of thought. It's sad that in 2022, you are so insecure and still seek the approval of others. Really girl, you're worried that they consider you an affirmative action pick. You are that insecure of your achievements that you use precious braincells for that line of thought. Pitiful

I am not insecure at all. I’m saying Biden hurt her credibility while trying to pander and self congratulate. KBJ is more than qualified, and should be the nominee, Biden just did it the wrong way, and that will stick with her forever. It’s insulting, and you give him a pass for it.

DP... Just stop it. KBJ's record already speaks for itself. She's an excellent nominee.

I’ve never said she was not an excellent nominee, I’ve said the opposite. You’re so blinded trying to "prove" something you can’t even understand the point I’m making. I’ll try again and dumb it down for you.

She’s an excellent nominee
She deserves the job

She will always have an * by her name through no fault of her own. That is 100% on Biden and it’s disgusting he did that to her

What does that * stand for? I don't understand what you are saying.

I don't see any * next to Sandra Day O'Connor's name. If Ketanji Brown Jackson gets one, then surely SDO gets one, too.

And what does that mean anyway?

All the white men supreme court justices prior to about the 1960s would get one next to their names. Because they were nominated and chosen at a time when only white men were considered eligible to sit on the Supreme Court by all those who held power. You cannot deny that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The main issue is the way it was done. Biden announcing the nomination will only be a black woman is what is damaging. She will always be seen as the affirmative action choice, and he did her a great disservice handling it that way.

I will speak on behalf of all brilliant and more than qualified AAs in the US. You are not in her league and she isn’t thinking about you or your narrow beliefs at all. She is too busy reaping the fruits and rewards of her, gift of superior intellect, hard work and excellence.

Life’s not always fair and yes some people really are smarter than others. And you and everyone else in the room knows it and these people often aren’t in the package you think they should be.

You are very welcome.

I’m the one you are replying to. I am an AA Woman you fool. You do not speak for all of us.

NP. And you speak for very few, or the ones closely aligned to the Clarence Thomas' school of thought. It's sad that in 2022, you are so insecure and still seek the approval of others. Really girl, you're worried that they consider you an affirmative action pick. You are that insecure of your achievements that you use precious braincells for that line of thought. Pitiful

I am not insecure at all. I’m saying Biden hurt her credibility while trying to pander and self congratulate. KBJ is more than qualified, and should be the nominee, Biden just did it the wrong way, and that will stick with her forever. It’s insulting, and you give him a pass for it.

DP... Just stop it. KBJ's record already speaks for itself. She's an excellent nominee.

I’ve never said she was not an excellent nominee, I’ve said the opposite. You’re so blinded trying to "prove" something you can’t even understand the point I’m making. I’ll try again and dumb it down for you.

She’s an excellent nominee
She deserves the job

She will always have an * by her name through no fault of her own. That is 100% on Biden and it’s disgusting he did that to her

She will only have an asterisk by her name for racists.

Gorsuch*, Kavanaugh** and the handmaiden*** will actually have asterisks next to their name.

*stolen seat, political hack, unqualified, nominated by loser of popular vote
**seat opened in suspicious circumstances, political hack, unqualified, nominated by loser of popular vote
***nominated and seated by man actively losing an election underway, political hack, unqualified, actual affirmative action hire

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The main issue is the way it was done. Biden announcing the nomination will only be a black woman is what is damaging. She will always be seen as the affirmative action choice, and he did her a great disservice handling it that way.

I will speak on behalf of all brilliant and more than qualified AAs in the US. You are not in her league and she isn’t thinking about you or your narrow beliefs at all. She is too busy reaping the fruits and rewards of her, gift of superior intellect, hard work and excellence.

Life’s not always fair and yes some people really are smarter than others. And you and everyone else in the room knows it and these people often aren’t in the package you think they should be.

You are very welcome.

I’m the one you are replying to. I am an AA Woman you fool. You do not speak for all of us.

NP. And you speak for very few, or the ones closely aligned to the Clarence Thomas' school of thought. It's sad that in 2022, you are so insecure and still seek the approval of others. Really girl, you're worried that they consider you an affirmative action pick. You are that insecure of your achievements that you use precious braincells for that line of thought. Pitiful

I am not insecure at all. I’m saying Biden hurt her credibility while trying to pander and self congratulate. KBJ is more than qualified, and should be the nominee, Biden just did it the wrong way, and that will stick with her forever. It’s insulting, and you give him a pass for it.

DP... Just stop it. KBJ's record already speaks for itself. She's an excellent nominee.

I’ve never said she was not an excellent nominee, I’ve said the opposite. You’re so blinded trying to "prove" something you can’t even understand the point I’m making. I’ll try again and dumb it down for you.

She’s an excellent nominee
She deserves the job

She will always have an * by her name through no fault of her own. That is 100% on Biden and it’s disgusting he did that to her

Biden made a promise to his most reliable voter base and he kept it. It may have been what triggered turnout for him, who knows. But she’s brilliant and talented and the right wingers don’t even have half a leg to stand on after the straight unqualified garbage they nominated at all levels over the past term. Just shut down the discussion. There is no asterisk after her name. Anyone who implies that there should be needs to be called to the carpet.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The main issue is the way it was done. Biden announcing the nomination will only be a black woman is what is damaging. She will always be seen as the affirmative action choice, and he did her a great disservice handling it that way.

I will speak on behalf of all brilliant and more than qualified AAs in the US. You are not in her league and she isn’t thinking about you or your narrow beliefs at all. She is too busy reaping the fruits and rewards of her, gift of superior intellect, hard work and excellence.

Life’s not always fair and yes some people really are smarter than others. And you and everyone else in the room knows it and these people often aren’t in the package you think they should be.

You are very welcome.

I’m the one you are replying to. I am an AA Woman you fool. You do not speak for all of us.

NP. And you speak for very few, or the ones closely aligned to the Clarence Thomas' school of thought. It's sad that in 2022, you are so insecure and still seek the approval of others. Really girl, you're worried that they consider you an affirmative action pick. You are that insecure of your achievements that you use precious braincells for that line of thought. Pitiful

I am not insecure at all. I’m saying Biden hurt her credibility while trying to pander and self congratulate. KBJ is more than qualified, and should be the nominee, Biden just did it the wrong way, and that will stick with her forever. It’s insulting, and you give him a pass for it.

+1

Wouldn't this pick (and choosing Harris) have had MORE impact if he said he was choosing the best person for the job and then that person turned out to be a black woman. This is a disgusting level of pandering and I'm surprised people are falling for it. By saying "I'm choosing the best black woman" he's saying he's excluding people (who are perhaps more qualified) based on gender and race. It's just bizarre.

DP. Oh, please. People hire other people for jobs for all kinds of non-objective reasons besides them being "the best person for the job." VPs are routinely chosen based on factors such as geography and assumptions about constituencies they represent. You think Pence was "the best person for the job" in the whole of America? He was chosen because he represented the evangelical vote. You think Brett K and ACB were "the best persons for the job" in all of America? As if....

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The main issue is the way it was done. Biden announcing the nomination will only be a black woman is what is damaging. She will always be seen as the affirmative action choice, and he did her a great disservice handling it that way.

I will speak on behalf of all brilliant and more than qualified AAs in the US. You are not in her league and she isn’t thinking about you or your narrow beliefs at all. She is too busy reaping the fruits and rewards of her, gift of superior intellect, hard work and excellence.

Life’s not always fair and yes some people really are smarter than others. And you and everyone else in the room knows it and these people often aren’t in the package you think they should be.

You are very welcome.

I’m the one you are replying to. I am an AA Woman you fool. You do not speak for all of us.

NP. And you speak for very few, or the ones closely aligned to the Clarence Thomas' school of thought. It's sad that in 2022, you are so insecure and still seek the approval of others. Really girl, you're worried that they consider you an affirmative action pick. You are that insecure of your achievements that you use precious braincells for that line of thought. Pitiful

I am not insecure at all. I’m saying Biden hurt her credibility while trying to pander and self congratulate. KBJ is more than qualified, and should be the nominee, Biden just did it the wrong way, and that will stick with her forever. It’s insulting, and you give him a pass for it.

DP... Just stop it. KBJ's record already speaks for itself. She's an excellent nominee.

I’ve never said she was not an excellent nominee, I’ve said the opposite. You’re so blinded trying to "prove" something you can’t even understand the point I’m making. I’ll try again and dumb it down for you.

She’s an excellent nominee
She deserves the job

She will always have an * by her name through no fault of her own. That is 100% on Biden and it’s disgusting he did that to her

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The main issue is the way it was done. Biden announcing the nomination will only be a black woman is what is damaging. She will always be seen as the affirmative action choice, and he did her a great disservice handling it that way.

I will speak on behalf of all brilliant and more than qualified AAs in the US. You are not in her league and she isn’t thinking about you or your narrow beliefs at all. She is too busy reaping the fruits and rewards of her, gift of superior intellect, hard work and excellence.

Life’s not always fair and yes some people really are smarter than others. And you and everyone else in the room knows it and these people often aren’t in the package you think they should be.

You are very welcome.

I’m the one you are replying to. I am an AA Woman you fool. You do not speak for all of us.

NP. And you speak for very few, or the ones closely aligned to the Clarence Thomas' school of thought. It's sad that in 2022, you are so insecure and still seek the approval of others. Really girl, you're worried that they consider you an affirmative action pick. You are that insecure of your achievements that you use precious braincells for that line of thought. Pitiful

I am not insecure at all. I’m saying Biden hurt her credibility while trying to pander and self congratulate. KBJ is more than qualified, and should be the nominee, Biden just did it the wrong way, and that will stick with her forever. It’s insulting, and you give him a pass for it.

DP... Just stop it. KBJ's record already speaks for itself. She's an excellent nominee.

She would’ve been near the top of any Democratic President’s short list no matter whether he or she made that promise or not.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The main issue is the way it was done. Biden announcing the nomination will only be a black woman is what is damaging. She will always be seen as the affirmative action choice, and he did her a great disservice handling it that way.

I will speak on behalf of all brilliant and more than qualified AAs in the US. You are not in her league and she isn’t thinking about you or your narrow beliefs at all. She is too busy reaping the fruits and rewards of her, gift of superior intellect, hard work and excellence.

Life’s not always fair and yes some people really are smarter than others. And you and everyone else in the room knows it and these people often aren’t in the package you think they should be.

You are very welcome.

I’m the one you are replying to. I am an AA Woman you fool. You do not speak for all of us.

NP. And you speak for very few, or the ones closely aligned to the Clarence Thomas' school of thought. It's sad that in 2022, you are so insecure and still seek the approval of others. Really girl, you're worried that they consider you an affirmative action pick. You are that insecure of your achievements that you use precious braincells for that line of thought. Pitiful

I am not insecure at all. I’m saying Biden hurt her credibility while trying to pander and self congratulate. KBJ is more than qualified, and should be the nominee, Biden just did it the wrong way, and that will stick with her forever. It’s insulting, and you give him a pass for it.

+1

Wouldn't this pick (and choosing Harris) have had MORE impact if he said he was choosing the best person for the job and then that person turned out to be a black woman. This is a disgusting level of pandering and I'm surprised people are falling for it. By saying "I'm choosing the best black woman" he's saying he's excluding people (who are perhaps more qualified) based on gender and race. It's just bizarre.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The main issue is the way it was done. Biden announcing the nomination will only be a black woman is what is damaging. She will always be seen as the affirmative action choice, and he did her a great disservice handling it that way.

I will speak on behalf of all brilliant and more than qualified AAs in the US. You are not in her league and she isn’t thinking about you or your narrow beliefs at all. She is too busy reaping the fruits and rewards of her, gift of superior intellect, hard work and excellence.

Life’s not always fair and yes some people really are smarter than others. And you and everyone else in the room knows it and these people often aren’t in the package you think they should be.

You are very welcome.

I’m the one you are replying to. I am an AA Woman you fool. You do not speak for all of us.

NP. And you speak for very few, or the ones closely aligned to the Clarence Thomas' school of thought. It's sad that in 2022, you are so insecure and still seek the approval of others. Really girl, you're worried that they consider you an affirmative action pick. You are that insecure of your achievements that you use precious braincells for that line of thought. Pitiful

DP. The whole point is that acts like Biden's can take the sheen off of her excellence, which should stand by itself. Instead, Biden had to do his "beneficent white dude" act; something not altogether unfamiliar to white liberals. What benefit was gained from announcing it the way he did except that which accrued only to Biden? Lame.

Was the sheen taken off of Sandra Day O'Conner when Ronald Reagan announced he was looking to appoint a woman to the Court and then proceeded to only consider women candidates?

I don't remember, I'm not that old.

Well I am that old and do remember. And the answer is no, it did not take the shine off Justice O'Connor. Women, Republicans and Democrats both, and some men too all over America were ecstatic and praised Reagan's decision. Of course white women, who have been the greatest beneficiaries of affirmative action, never deemed it affirmative action when O'Connor was appointed That affirmative action label is only thrown at Blacks and Brown/Black Hispanics. Miss me with your trite bullshit.

No, I will not miss you, goof. White liberals always want to go around patting themselves on the back for elevating a black person. FOH. Blinded by their own self-congratulatory fog.

And white, alt-right conservatives pat their asses, backs, and any everything else for elevating incompetent white people such as ACB and Kavanaugh. Blinded by their own hate.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The main issue is the way it was done. Biden announcing the nomination will only be a black woman is what is damaging. She will always be seen as the affirmative action choice, and he did her a great disservice handling it that way.

I will speak on behalf of all brilliant and more than qualified AAs in the US. You are not in her league and she isn’t thinking about you or your narrow beliefs at all. She is too busy reaping the fruits and rewards of her, gift of superior intellect, hard work and excellence.

Life’s not always fair and yes some people really are smarter than others. And you and everyone else in the room knows it and these people often aren’t in the package you think they should be.

You are very welcome.

I’m the one you are replying to. I am an AA Woman you fool. You do not speak for all of us.

NP. And you speak for very few, or the ones closely aligned to the Clarence Thomas' school of thought. It's sad that in 2022, you are so insecure and still seek the approval of others. Really girl, you're worried that they consider you an affirmative action pick. You are that insecure of your achievements that you use precious braincells for that line of thought. Pitiful

I am not insecure at all. I’m saying Biden hurt her credibility while trying to pander and self congratulate. KBJ is more than qualified, and should be the nominee, Biden just did it the wrong way, and that will stick with her forever. It’s insulting, and you give him a pass for it.

DP... Just stop it. KBJ's record already speaks for itself. She's an excellent nominee.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She will sail through confirmation because, even if republicans don’t like her, they don’t want to appear racist in an election year. There are too many parallels as it is, so this one justice, who can’t tip the scales on major cases at the present time anyway because of the 6-3 majority, isn’t worth a fight.

There will be no fight as she is a liberal replacing a liberal. Dems have 50 votes (I think only 49 for now with the senator out), but some republicans will vote for her.

If she was selected to replace a conservative justice, she would get zero support and would have to wait for the senator Lujan to get back to get the 50th vote.

Even though she is qualified. She is hardly the “most qualified” overall. There are many other judges that had longer records and more experience. Judge Srinivasan for one…. But his gender and race did not fit the bill.

She is more qualified than whoever you voted for would have nominated.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The main issue is the way it was done. Biden announcing the nomination will only be a black woman is what is damaging. She will always be seen as the affirmative action choice, and he did her a great disservice handling it that way.

I will speak on behalf of all brilliant and more than qualified AAs in the US. You are not in her league and she isn’t thinking about you or your narrow beliefs at all. She is too busy reaping the fruits and rewards of her, gift of superior intellect, hard work and excellence.

Life’s not always fair and yes some people really are smarter than others. And you and everyone else in the room knows it and these people often aren’t in the package you think they should be.

You are very welcome.

I’m the one you are replying to. I am an AA Woman you fool. You do not speak for all of us.

NP. And you speak for very few, or the ones closely aligned to the Clarence Thomas' school of thought. It's sad that in 2022, you are so insecure and still seek the approval of others. Really girl, you're worried that they consider you an affirmative action pick. You are that insecure of your achievements that you use precious braincells for that line of thought. Pitiful

I am not insecure at all. I’m saying Biden hurt her credibility while trying to pander and self congratulate. KBJ is more than qualified, and should be the nominee, Biden just did it the wrong way, and that will stick with her forever. It’s insulting, and you give him a pass for it.

Anonymous wrote:Are Manchin and Sinema sure votes?

They voted to elevate her to the second highest court less than a year ago.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The main issue is the way it was done. Biden announcing the nomination will only be a black woman is what is damaging. She will always be seen as the affirmative action choice, and he did her a great disservice handling it that way.

I will speak on behalf of all brilliant and more than qualified AAs in the US. You are not in her league and she isn’t thinking about you or your narrow beliefs at all. She is too busy reaping the fruits and rewards of her, gift of superior intellect, hard work and excellence.

Life’s not always fair and yes some people really are smarter than others. And you and everyone else in the room knows it and these people often aren’t in the package you think they should be.

You are very welcome.

I’m the one you are replying to. I am an AA Woman you fool. You do not speak for all of us.

NP. And you speak for very few, or the ones closely aligned to the Clarence Thomas' school of thought. It's sad that in 2022, you are so insecure and still seek the approval of others. Really girl, you're worried that they consider you an affirmative action pick. You are that insecure of your achievements that you use precious braincells for that line of thought. Pitiful

DP. The whole point is that acts like Biden's can take the sheen off of her excellence, which should stand by itself. Instead, Biden had to do his "beneficent white dude" act; something not altogether unfamiliar to white liberals. What benefit was gained from announcing it the way he did except that which accrued only to Biden? Lame.

Was the sheen taken off of Sandra Day O'Conner when Ronald Reagan announced he was looking to appoint a woman to the Court and then proceeded to only consider women candidates?

I don't remember, I'm not that old.

Well I am that old and do remember. And the answer is no, it did not take the shine off Justice O'Connor. Women, Republicans and Democrats both, and some men too all over America were ecstatic and praised Reagan's decision. Of course white women, who have been the greatest beneficiaries of affirmative action, never deemed it affirmative action when O'Connor was appointed That affirmative action label is only thrown at Blacks and Brown/Black Hispanics. Miss me with your trite bullshit.

No, I will not miss you, goof. White liberals always want to go around patting themselves on the back for elevating a black person. FOH. Blinded by their own self-congratulatory fog.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The main issue is the way it was done. Biden announcing the nomination will only be a black woman is what is damaging. She will always be seen as the affirmative action choice, and he did her a great disservice handling it that way.

I will speak on behalf of all brilliant and more than qualified AAs in the US. You are not in her league and she isn’t thinking about you or your narrow beliefs at all. She is too busy reaping the fruits and rewards of her, gift of superior intellect, hard work and excellence.

Life’s not always fair and yes some people really are smarter than others. And you and everyone else in the room knows it and these people often aren’t in the package you think they should be.

You are very welcome.

I’m the one you are replying to. I am an AA Woman you fool. You do not speak for all of us.

NP. And you speak for very few, or the ones closely aligned to the Clarence Thomas' school of thought. It's sad that in 2022, you are so insecure and still seek the approval of others. Really girl, you're worried that they consider you an affirmative action pick. You are that insecure of your achievements that you use precious braincells for that line of thought. Pitiful

DP. The whole point is that acts like Biden's can take the sheen off of her excellence, which should stand by itself. Instead, Biden had to do his "beneficent white dude" act; something not altogether unfamiliar to white liberals. What benefit was gained from announcing it the way he did except that which accrued only to Biden? Lame.

Was the sheen taken off of Sandra Day O'Conner when Ronald Reagan announced he was looking to appoint a woman to the Court and then proceeded to only consider women candidates?

I don't remember, I'm not that old.

Well I am that old and do remember. And the answer is no, it did not take the shine off Justice O'Connor. Women, Republicans and Democrats both, and some men too all over America were ecstatic and praised Reagan's decision. Of course white women, who have been the greatest beneficiaries of affirmative action, never deemed it affirmative action when O'Connor was appointed That affirmative action label is only thrown at Blacks and Brown/Black Hispanics. Miss me with your trite bullshit.

Anonymous wrote:Thank god it was on her merits, not go any other pre announced reasons.

Thank G-D that Biden did not Kamala the Supreme Court nominee. Brown is smart and strong and much more important than Harris, the promise keeper.