Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do not move to the Chicago area. Been there done that.
Why do you say that? My instant negatives are winter and northern state taxation but other reasons?
Anonymous wrote:Chicago is a real city; like second only to New York City in density and size. It is really cold from October to late April.
When I was there my Chicago born friend who had young family swore they would never leave. Then Boeing relocated them to Charleston and eventually their families left for SC who had been there for generations. I did 2 years there and it is fine; just really cold. I was single but after seeing my friend leave and never come back or look back I never considered that a place I would want to live.
My friend never lost his Chicago accent though, so there is another negative.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Housing prices will be much lower. You can get into the north shore suburbs for much less than what you'd pay for an equivalent location here
I moved to DMV 10 years ago from Chicago.
I do not miss Chicago one bit.
Housing prices are cheaper in the North Shore suburbs (than Chevy Chase/Bethesda), but not significantly so.
The weather is terrible. The people are boring. Try finding someone who reads the New York Times!!
Ugh. I could not get out of there fast enough.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wilmette on the North shore. About 30-40 minutes on the train to downtown Chicago. Older houses, but many are very updated and beautiful. Close to the lakefront, many amenities. great schools. Still, very cold in the winter. Lovely spring and fall in Chicago, which is a beautiful, large city, much nicer than DC.
Wilmette doesn't have much in it. You're going to want to drive to another town over to do your shopping and dining.
Wilmette has plenty in it! I used to live there, and I know this for a fact! If you want Ikea and Costco, yes, you have to travel. But regular shopping is available in Wilmette. It's a great suburb (except for that cold weather).
Recently? I was there today. Lots of empty storefronts in the downtown area near the Metra station, and lots of the retail is open very limited hours. Like the coffee shop that is only open Fri-Sun until 1pm.
Btw, that's not a dig at Wilmette necessarily, but if OP is really looking for something along the lines of NOVA/MD suburbs like Bethesda, Arlington, Fairfax... I'm surprised that people are mentioning Highland Park and Wilmette. Not really a fair comparison, IMO unless you're really just talking about schools and housing stock. I find the NOVA/MD burbs much more liveable.
Anonymous wrote:Chicago suburbs will be cheaper. These certainly aren't perfect comparisons to Vienna due to the broader differences in the Metro areas, mainly Chicago is a much bigger city and older. With that caveat and assuming you want Metra access take a look at Des Plaines, Arlington Heights, Park Ridge, Elmhurst, Western Springs, Glen Ellyn and La Grange as very rough comparables. You are overall likely to be thrilled by school quality from K -12 and easier/somewhat less costly childcare options and, as many have rightly said, shocked by local taxes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's the property taxes that are the barrier to getting in. While the housing prices are lower, their taxes are sky high.
A $900K house in Naperville for example has a property tax of $20K. A $900K house in MoCo would have around $10K in property taxes.
But you get a nice house for 900k in Naperville rather than a tiny sh!tshack in MoCo.
Naperville is not a suburb of Chicago lol
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's the property taxes that are the barrier to getting in. While the housing prices are lower, their taxes are sky high.
A $900K house in Naperville for example has a property tax of $20K. A $900K house in MoCo would have around $10K in property taxes.
But you get a nice house for 900k in Naperville rather than a tiny sh!tshack in MoCo.
Naperville is not a suburb of Chicago lol
It absolutely is a suburb - a western suburb easily accessible on Metra. And it’s older than Chicago.
yea what exactly is Naperville if not a suburb?[/quote
It is an exurb. It is about the same distance as downtown DC to Manassas with an arguably longer commute time if you drive. Most people that live that far out are working in the western suburbs, not Chicago.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's the property taxes that are the barrier to getting in. While the housing prices are lower, their taxes are sky high.
A $900K house in Naperville for example has a property tax of $20K. A $900K house in MoCo would have around $10K in property taxes.
Not to mention that a Naperville to Chicago commute just would not be feasible for most. If you're from the Midwest, I guess it's no big deal to travel for that long, but I think it's crazy.