Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone remember ratgate: when DC wanted to "humanely" solve its rat problem by trapping all the rats, drive them across the river and release them along the GW Parkway in Virginia.
And Virginia was like "no f-ing way"
LOL
As if Virginia doesn't have rats
Why would *any* state want to take your disgusting rats for you? Deal with them yourselves.![]()
DP
Look at you, pretending you don't have any disgusting rats of your own.
Of course we have rats. Duh.
We just don’t want MORE of YOUR rats.
Are you this dense with everything else you encounter?
At least now you admit you have your own disgusting rat problem, too. Maybe consider that first, before presuming to look down your nose at DC for its rat problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone remember ratgate: when DC wanted to "humanely" solve its rat problem by trapping all the rats, drive them across the river and release them along the GW Parkway in Virginia.
And Virginia was like "no f-ing way"
LOL
As if Virginia doesn't have rats
Why would *any* state want to take your disgusting rats for you? Deal with them yourselves.![]()
DP
Look at you, pretending you don't have any disgusting rats of your own.
Of course we have rats. Duh.
We just don’t want MORE of YOUR rats.
Are you this dense with everything else you encounter?
At least now you admit you have your own disgusting rat problem, too. Maybe consider that first, before presuming to look down your nose at DC for its rat problem.
DO but I’m cringing at how thick you are. There are rats everywhere. DC has a rat problem. Do you understand the difference?
So much DC whataboutism. DC gun crime is fine (just be "streetsmart" whatever that means), DC homelessness is fine, DC rat problems is fine, DC poor education system is fine, as long as these same things exist in SOME neighboring county or state, in SOME form, even if not remotely as bad as in DC proper.
What's cringey is constantly singling out DC and picking on DC over rats when Alexandria and other places have every bit as much of a rat problem as DC. And then getting angry and shouting "whataboutism" when the lack of merit of your bizarre singular focus and obsession with DC is pointed out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone remember ratgate: when DC wanted to "humanely" solve its rat problem by trapping all the rats, drive them across the river and release them along the GW Parkway in Virginia.
And Virginia was like "no f-ing way"
LOL
As if Virginia doesn't have rats
Why would *any* state want to take your disgusting rats for you? Deal with them yourselves.![]()
DP
Look at you, pretending you don't have any disgusting rats of your own.
Of course we have rats. Duh.
We just don’t want MORE of YOUR rats.
Are you this dense with everything else you encounter?
At least now you admit you have your own disgusting rat problem, too. Maybe consider that first, before presuming to look down your nose at DC for its rat problem.
DO but I’m cringing at how thick you are. There are rats everywhere. DC has a rat problem. Do you understand the difference?
So much DC whataboutism. DC gun crime is fine (just be "streetsmart" whatever that means), DC homelessness is fine, DC rat problems is fine, DC poor education system is fine, as long as these same things exist in SOME neighboring county or state, in SOME form, even if not remotely as bad as in DC proper.
What's cringey is constantly singling out DC and picking on DC over rats when Alexandria and other places have every bit as much of a rat problem as DC. And then getting angry and shouting "whataboutism" when the lack of merit of your bizarre singular focus and obsession with DC is pointed out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone remember ratgate: when DC wanted to "humanely" solve its rat problem by trapping all the rats, drive them across the river and release them along the GW Parkway in Virginia.
And Virginia was like "no f-ing way"
LOL
As if Virginia doesn't have rats
Why would *any* state want to take your disgusting rats for you? Deal with them yourselves.![]()
DP
Look at you, pretending you don't have any disgusting rats of your own.
Of course we have rats. Duh.
We just don’t want MORE of YOUR rats.
Are you this dense with everything else you encounter?
At least now you admit you have your own disgusting rat problem, too. Maybe consider that first, before presuming to look down your nose at DC for its rat problem.
DO but I’m cringing at how thick you are. There are rats everywhere. DC has a rat problem. Do you understand the difference?
So much DC whataboutism. DC gun crime is fine (just be "streetsmart" whatever that means), DC homelessness is fine, DC rat problems is fine, DC poor education system is fine, as long as these same things exist in SOME neighboring county or state, in SOME form, even if not remotely as bad as in DC proper.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone remember ratgate: when DC wanted to "humanely" solve its rat problem by trapping all the rats, drive them across the river and release them along the GW Parkway in Virginia.
And Virginia was like "no f-ing way"
LOL
As if Virginia doesn't have rats
Why would *any* state want to take your disgusting rats for you? Deal with them yourselves.![]()
DP
Look at you, pretending you don't have any disgusting rats of your own.
Of course we have rats. Duh.
We just don’t want MORE of YOUR rats.
Are you this dense with everything else you encounter?
At least now you admit you have your own disgusting rat problem, too. Maybe consider that first, before presuming to look down your nose at DC for its rat problem.
DO but I’m cringing at how thick you are. There are rats everywhere. DC has a rat problem. Do you understand the difference?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone remember ratgate: when DC wanted to "humanely" solve its rat problem by trapping all the rats, drive them across the river and release them along the GW Parkway in Virginia.
And Virginia was like "no f-ing way"
LOL
As if Virginia doesn't have rats
Why would *any* state want to take your disgusting rats for you? Deal with them yourselves.![]()
DP
Look at you, pretending you don't have any disgusting rats of your own.
Of course we have rats. Duh.
We just don’t want MORE of YOUR rats.
Are you this dense with everything else you encounter?
At least now you admit you have your own disgusting rat problem, too. Maybe consider that first, before presuming to look down your nose at DC for its rat problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The city should pay a cash bounty on dead rats.
Enterprising folks would pocket some serious $$$, and the rat population would be reduced. Not eliminated, but definitely reduced.
Right now there’s no incentive for anyone to do anything about getting rid of them. So incentivize it. Use economics to fight the problem. Assign a value to rats, and pay the people who turn them in.
This is a good idea. OP here - back in the rats in the sandbox days, we called city rat control twice. They came.in space suits, poked around for nests and left without doing anything. This was years ago... What are other cities doing? Any new methods? Sterilization??? I like the idea of leading them across the highway - very Pied Piper of Hamelin, but not super fair to our neighbors.
Pay $10 for each dead rat turned in to any designated collection site in the city. Homeless people would be catching and killing rats all day long.
$10 and the city would be bankrupt in a week. I'd start way lower. Maybe by the pound? I just threw up a little thinking about that...
I agree with you. There are many more than we think...
I remember returning cans and bottles in the 80s to the store for 5 cents each. People filled up carts... I guess it could work.
I worry about disease spreading--people catching them with their hands, rocks etc.
WHO would catch a rat with their hands for $10? So disgusting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone remember ratgate: when DC wanted to "humanely" solve its rat problem by trapping all the rats, drive them across the river and release them along the GW Parkway in Virginia.
And Virginia was like "no f-ing way"
LOL
As if Virginia doesn't have rats
Why would *any* state want to take your disgusting rats for you? Deal with them yourselves.![]()
DP
Look at you, pretending you don't have any disgusting rats of your own.
Of course we have rats. Duh.
We just don’t want MORE of YOUR rats.
Are you this dense with everything else you encounter?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone remember ratgate: when DC wanted to "humanely" solve its rat problem by trapping all the rats, drive them across the river and release them along the GW Parkway in Virginia.
And Virginia was like "no f-ing way"
LOL
As if Virginia doesn't have rats
Why would *any* state want to take your disgusting rats for you? Deal with them yourselves.![]()
DP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone remember ratgate: when DC wanted to "humanely" solve its rat problem by trapping all the rats, drive them across the river and release them along the GW Parkway in Virginia.
And Virginia was like "no f-ing way"
LOL
As if Virginia doesn't have rats
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone remember ratgate: when DC wanted to "humanely" solve its rat problem by trapping all the rats, drive them across the river and release them along the GW Parkway in Virginia.
And Virginia was like "no f-ing way"
LOL