Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sourpuss OP should just stay home and sulk about money and let DH and kids go. She doesn't like the inlaws, they probably don't care for her either. Everyone should stop pretending except the husband and children.
Um, that sounds like an amazing deal for OP. Her husband can manage three kids on his own running all over a national park while she gets a quiet house all to herself. Staycation!
Except then DH has no more PTO because he’s wasted it on this ego stroking trip, so OP doesn’t get to vacation with her own family, all because her in-laws are cheap.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My in laws did this to us— “took” us on vacation and covered hotels while international airfare was on us. Oh and *just* us his married sisters were treated to everything. We have subsequently declined to travel with them except when it’s someplace we want to go and we invite *them* to join *us* at their expense if they want to. Much less resentment that way.
SAME. Except my SILs aren't married. They plan all these trips with my inlaws that don't work at all for my family (like in the middle of the school year, Ocean City in January), inlaws pay for them, not us. I absolutely refuse to spend my annual leave on Ocean City in January. I like my inlaws, just not vacationing there or spending money in places I don't want to be. We've invited them on trips that we thought they'd enjoy, but of course they decline. So I feel no guilt when I decline too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sourpuss OP should just stay home and sulk about money and let DH and kids go. She doesn't like the inlaws, they probably don't care for her either. Everyone should stop pretending except the husband and children.
Um, that sounds like an amazing deal for OP. Her husband can manage three kids on his own running all over a national park while she gets a quiet house all to herself. Staycation!
Anonymous wrote:My in laws did this to us— “took” us on vacation and covered hotels while international airfare was on us. Oh and *just* us his married sisters were treated to everything. We have subsequently declined to travel with them except when it’s someplace we want to go and we invite *them* to join *us* at their expense if they want to. Much less resentment that way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sourpuss OP should just stay home and sulk about money and let DH and kids go. She doesn't like the inlaws, they probably don't care for her either. Everyone should stop pretending except the husband and children.
Um, that sounds like an amazing deal for OP. Her husband can manage three kids on his own running all over a national park while she gets a quiet house all to herself. Staycation!
Anonymous wrote:Sourpuss OP should just stay home and sulk about money and let DH and kids go. She doesn't like the inlaws, they probably don't care for her either. Everyone should stop pretending except the husband and children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My in laws did this to us— “took” us on vacation and covered hotels while international airfare was on us. Oh and *just* us his married sisters were treated to everything. We have subsequently declined to travel with them except when it’s someplace we want to go and we invite *them* to join *us* at their expense if they want to. Much less resentment that way.
How did that go down? What made them think that was a good approach?
I don’t know that they think it’s a good idea, but they know it’s the only way they’re vacationing with us.
It went down by my saying, I am not using half of my PTO to go on a vacation that someone else chooses as their all-expenses-paid dream vacation and we’re just along for the ride. My husband was so embarrassed that his parents did it in the first place I think he would have been fine never vacationing with them again, but as a compromise we invite them on trips when it suits us to do so.
I just can't imagine paying for only 2 of 3 siblings. Who does that???
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My in laws did this to us— “took” us on vacation and covered hotels while international airfare was on us. Oh and *just* us his married sisters were treated to everything. We have subsequently declined to travel with them except when it’s someplace we want to go and we invite *them* to join *us* at their expense if they want to. Much less resentment that way.
How did that go down? What made them think that was a good approach?
I don’t know that they think it’s a good idea, but they know it’s the only way they’re vacationing with us.
It went down by my saying, I am not using half of my PTO to go on a vacation that someone else chooses as their all-expenses-paid dream vacation and we’re just along for the ride. My husband was so embarrassed that his parents did it in the first place I think he would have been fine never vacationing with them again, but as a compromise we invite them on trips when it suits us to do so.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My in laws did this to us— “took” us on vacation and covered hotels while international airfare was on us. Oh and *just* us his married sisters were treated to everything. We have subsequently declined to travel with them except when it’s someplace we want to go and we invite *them* to join *us* at their expense if they want to. Much less resentment that way.
How did that go down? What made them think that was a good approach?