Anonymous wrote:McLean is the most convenient place on earth. No clue what OP is talking about. They have the nicest Giant I've ever seen, Balducci's grocery, The Organic Butcher, Santinis subs, Starbucks, Cava, a ton of restaurants, Total Wine, a nice hardware store, Sherwin Williams, Ben Moore, dry cleaners, a toy store, a ton of salons, two 7-11s, and it's right by both Tysons malls. What more do you want???
Anonymous wrote:And why are there no ice cream shops?? Seems like there should be some quaint homemade ice cream place.
Anonymous wrote:And why are there no ice cream shops?? Seems like there should be some quaint homemade ice cream place.
Anonymous wrote:And why are there no ice cream shops?? Seems like there should be some quaint homemade ice cream place.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The ultra wealthy don’t really care about the same things you care about.
The ultrawealthy in cosmopolitan cities want amenities. Maybe not in backwoods Virginia.
Except backwoods Virginia is pretty much from where they originated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry noob question here as I just moved. Isn’t Mclean supposed to be an ultra wealthy area?
They've been trying to redevelop downtown McLean for a couple of decades but the surrounding homeowners associations/residents have been aggressive about petitioning for limitations. Primarily around height restrictions for the new buildings, traffic/parking, density (impact on already crowded schools) and requirements for public space in the plan.
We moved here 5 years ago and while there are some nice aspects of downtown McLean, it is clearly in need of substantial revitalization. We can walk downtown and I for one would welcome many changes. It feels like the old (and well funded) guard, and I mean that literally as the majority we hear/see complaining are 70+, are doing what they can to control the terms of McLean's business development. The whole "McLean small not Tyson's Tall" brigade... While I agree with some of their arguments, it feels like they are just too much overall and discouraging potential developers from stepping into the mix. Its a generalization, but many of the older residents seem to like that its a small and sleepy downtown... which I might be ok with if it was at least modernized. The run down strip malls and vacant storefronts like the old burger joint next to the butchers, are just ugly and don't attract new and interesting businesses/restaurants.
FWIW, we briefly lived in FCC years ago and there were similar issues there... but they eventually worked through them. Just my opinion as a ~45 yo living within walking distance to downtown that is hopeful that there are some improvements in the next decade.
Bethesdan here who happened to be in McLean today. It strikes me as very car-centric, not very walkable.
Frankly, I’m surprised the older residents were listened to. People from Bethesda and Chevy Chase protested the redevelopment of Bethesda, but the County Council could care less.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it were redeveloped, there would be lots of mixed use. Which means apartments where poor people might live. And the poor people would send their kids to the local schools. The rich wealthy people do not want this.
Yup.
McLean is full of apartments and condos with low income kids who are already in the schools. The only difference is that most of the low income kids are mostly Asians because the elementary schools feed into Longfellow Middle School which at one time had a good admission rate to TJ. Not sure how popular those buildings will be now that TJ has skewed its admittance policies. But kids can still go to McLean or Langley which are both good schools.
Anonymous wrote:McLean is notable not for being wealthier than other wealthy enclaves in the DC area, but for having very few middle class or lower families.
There are many many wealthy families and neighborhoods in NWDC, Bethesda, Old Town Alexandria, etc, but those areas are much more diverse than McLean. McLean is where you go if you have the money AND don’t want to share a zip code with anyone who is not similarly well off.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry noob question here as I just moved. Isn’t Mclean supposed to be an ultra wealthy area?
They've been trying to redevelop downtown McLean for a couple of decades but the surrounding homeowners associations/residents have been aggressive about petitioning for limitations. Primarily around height restrictions for the new buildings, traffic/parking, density (impact on already crowded schools) and requirements for public space in the plan.
We moved here 5 years ago and while there are some nice aspects of downtown McLean, it is clearly in need of substantial revitalization. We can walk downtown and I for one would welcome many changes. It feels like the old (and well funded) guard, and I mean that literally as the majority we hear/see complaining are 70+, are doing what they can to control the terms of McLean's business development. The whole "McLean small not Tyson's Tall" brigade... While I agree with some of their arguments, it feels like they are just too much overall and discouraging potential developers from stepping into the mix. Its a generalization, but many of the older residents seem to like that its a small and sleepy downtown... which I might be ok with if it was at least modernized. The run down strip malls and vacant storefronts like the old burger joint next to the butchers, are just ugly and don't attract new and interesting businesses/restaurants.
FWIW, we briefly lived in FCC years ago and there were similar issues there... but they eventually worked through them. Just my opinion as a ~45 yo living within walking distance to downtown that is hopeful that there are some improvements in the next decade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry noob question here as I just moved. Isn’t Mclean supposed to be an ultra wealthy area?
They've been trying to redevelop downtown McLean for a couple of decades but the surrounding homeowners associations/residents have been aggressive about petitioning for limitations. Primarily around height restrictions for the new buildings, traffic/parking, density (impact on already crowded schools) and requirements for public space in the plan.
We moved here 5 years ago and while there are some nice aspects of downtown McLean, it is clearly in need of substantial revitalization. We can walk downtown and I for one would welcome many changes. It feels like the old (and well funded) guard, and I mean that literally as the majority we hear/see complaining are 70+, are doing what they can to control the terms of McLean's business development. The whole "McLean small not Tyson's Tall" brigade... While I agree with some of their arguments, it feels like they are just too much overall and discouraging potential developers from stepping into the mix. Its a generalization, but many of the older residents seem to like that its a small and sleepy downtown... which I might be ok with if it was at least modernized. The run down strip malls and vacant storefronts like the old burger joint next to the butchers, are just ugly and don't attract new and interesting businesses/restaurants.
FWIW, we briefly lived in FCC years ago and there were similar issues there... but they eventually worked through them. Just my opinion as a ~45 yo living within walking distance to downtown that is hopeful that there are some improvements in the next decade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it were redeveloped, there would be lots of mixed use. Which means apartments where poor people might live. And the poor people would send their kids to the local schools. The rich wealthy people do not want this.
Yup.
The rich wealthy people do not send their kids to the local publics. They send their kids to Potomac, Sidwell, St. Albans, Georgetown Prep, etc.
The UMC people in McLean know that all the multi-family housing units in Tysons already go to Marshall HS and McLean HS; that any further multi-family housing in central McLean would go to McLean HS; and that the current School Board member has made sure none of it goes to Langley HS. And they also know that they current School Board isn't doing anything to expand McLean HS, which currently has 2361 kids in a building with fewer than 2000 permanent seats.
On the other hand, FCPS now has plans to expand Falls Church HS, which currently has an enrollment of under 2000 students, to 2500 seats. So, if there were more apartments and condos in central McLean, what would likely happen is that kids in less expensive apartments off Lee Highway in Merrifield would get bumped from McLean HS to Falls Church HS, and McLean HS would pick up kids from the more expensive new condos and apartments instead (along with a small number of affordable housing unit set-asides).
So it would actually play out rather differently than you suggest.
A cursory glance at the Langley High School parking lot would tell a different story. But thanks for playing.