Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fencing is not that hard to get good at and it is one of the easier sports to check the box with for college
Can you just stop? It is obvious you have a personal issue with fencing. You magically appear on DCUM with any mention of the sport to find a way to diminish it or anyone associated with it. It's not for everyone. Clearly it's not for you or your DC, which means you or your DC have invested little if any time in understanding it, which means you have zero knowledge to speak on it, which means you are adding zero value with respect to OPs question. Move on. This is getting old.
Stats don’t lie . 30 percent chance for a high school fencer to compete at college level. Lol
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fencing is not that hard to get good at and it is one of the easier sports to check the box with for college
Can you just stop? It is obvious you have a personal issue with fencing. You magically appear on DCUM with any mention of the sport to find a way to diminish it or anyone associated with it. It's not for everyone. Clearly it's not for you or your DC, which means you or your DC have invested little if any time in understanding it, which means you have zero knowledge to speak on it, which means you are adding zero value with respect to OPs question. Move on. This is getting old.
Stats don’t lie . 30 percent chance for a high school fencer to compete at college level. Lol
Just because you are competing at the college level does not mean that you are "good". There are plenty of fencers on collegiate rosters who are not on the national points list (not ranked) or who are rated B or below. Not all collegiate teams are competitive. Not all fencers on a given powerhouse team are competitive. The most competitive programs only recruit a handful of fencers each year. The rest of the fencers are walk-ons that are there as training partners and are likely never going to fence any NCAA competitions. For example, Columbia and Notre Dame have huge rosters relatively speaking. Most of those fencers won't get to compete at a single NCAA tournament. Correct, it is not that hard to walk on to a team once you're already admitted to the school. Correct, that inflates the percent of high school fencers able to fence at the college level.
This is a fair and balanced response. The other people attacking the PP was uncalled for.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fencing is not that hard to get good at and it is one of the easier sports to check the box with for college
Can you just stop? It is obvious you have a personal issue with fencing. You magically appear on DCUM with any mention of the sport to find a way to diminish it or anyone associated with it. It's not for everyone. Clearly it's not for you or your DC, which means you or your DC have invested little if any time in understanding it, which means you have zero knowledge to speak on it, which means you are adding zero value with respect to OPs question. Move on. This is getting old.
Stats don’t lie . 30 percent chance for a high school fencer to compete at college level. Lol
Just because you are competing at the college level does not mean that you are "good". There are plenty of fencers on collegiate rosters who are not on the national points list (not ranked) or who are rated B or below. Not all collegiate teams are competitive. Not all fencers on a given powerhouse team are competitive. The most competitive programs only recruit a handful of fencers each year. The rest of the fencers are walk-ons that are there as training partners and are likely never going to fence any NCAA competitions. For example, Columbia and Notre Dame have huge rosters relatively speaking. Most of those fencers won't get to compete at a single NCAA tournament. Correct, it is not that hard to walk on to a team once you're already admitted to the school. Correct, that inflates the percent of high school fencers able to fence at the college level.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fencing is not that hard to get good at and it is one of the easier sports to check the box with for college
Seriously? You think an Olympic sport is "not that hard to get good at"? The top high school fencers spend 20-30 hours a week training, AND have to travel to six North American Cups a year to compete, AND have to travel to 4-7 Cadet and Junior World Cups in Europe each year, where they compete against the best European fencers (where fencing is taken very seriously), all while maintaining full high school schedules, taking AP classes, etc.
It’s all relative . You don’t see super stud athletes competing Jin fencing
You really don't know what you are talking about, and yet you revel and flaunt your lack of knowledge and feel compelled to post about things you know nothing about.
Here is the reality: fencing is extremely competitive. At the junior level (the high school kids we are talking about), thousands of fencers worldwide are going to international competitions each year. Only a few can make it to the top -- and the US fencers are pushing their way in, especially the female fencers. Despite this being a historically European sport, where sporting events are televised in prime time, etc., US junior women fencers have almost a dozen people in the top twenty fencers worldwide, in all three weapons (epee, foil, and saber). In two of the three sports, the number one sport worldwide is held by a US fencer (foil and saber), and i the third, a US fencer is ranked fifth globally. Just last week at a Junior World Cup, the two finalists were US fencers. But sure, let's go with your theory that they got their without working hard or being good athletes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fencing is not that hard to get good at and it is one of the easier sports to check the box with for college
Can you just stop? It is obvious you have a personal issue with fencing. You magically appear on DCUM with any mention of the sport to find a way to diminish it or anyone associated with it. It's not for everyone. Clearly it's not for you or your DC, which means you or your DC have invested little if any time in understanding it, which means you have zero knowledge to speak on it, which means you are adding zero value with respect to OPs question. Move on. This is getting old.
Stats don’t lie . 30 percent chance for a high school fencer to compete at college level. Lol
Anonymous wrote:Wow 30 percent cvavce . What a joke
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fencing is not that hard to get good at and it is one of the easier sports to check the box with for college
Can you just stop? It is obvious you have a personal issue with fencing. You magically appear on DCUM with any mention of the sport to find a way to diminish it or anyone associated with it. It's not for everyone. Clearly it's not for you or your DC, which means you or your DC have invested little if any time in understanding it, which means you have zero knowledge to speak on it, which means you are adding zero value with respect to OPs question. Move on. This is getting old.
Stats don’t lie . 30 percent chance for a high school fencer to compete at college level. Lol
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fencing is not that hard to get good at and it is one of the easier sports to check the box with for college
Seriously? You think an Olympic sport is "not that hard to get good at"? The top high school fencers spend 20-30 hours a week training, AND have to travel to six North American Cups a year to compete, AND have to travel to 4-7 Cadet and Junior World Cups in Europe each year, where they compete against the best European fencers (where fencing is taken very seriously), all while maintaining full high school schedules, taking AP classes, etc.
It’s all relative . You don’t see super stud athletes competing Jin fencing
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fencing is not that hard to get good at and it is one of the easier sports to check the box with for college
Can you just stop? It is obvious you have a personal issue with fencing. You magically appear on DCUM with any mention of the sport to find a way to diminish it or anyone associated with it. It's not for everyone. Clearly it's not for you or your DC, which means you or your DC have invested little if any time in understanding it, which means you have zero knowledge to speak on it, which means you are adding zero value with respect to OPs question. Move on. This is getting old.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fencing is not that hard to get good at and it is one of the easier sports to check the box with for college
Seriously? You think an Olympic sport is "not that hard to get good at"? The top high school fencers spend 20-30 hours a week training, AND have to travel to six North American Cups a year to compete, AND have to travel to 4-7 Cadet and Junior World Cups in Europe each year, where they compete against the best European fencers (where fencing is taken very seriously), all while maintaining full high school schedules, taking AP classes, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Fencing is not that hard to get good at and it is one of the easier sports to check the box with for college
Anonymous wrote:Fencing is not that hard to get good at and it is one of the easier sports to check the box with for college