Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not true. Turned down several hundreds of applicants last year, and have a 45% increase in applications this year, and, significantly less turnover than most private schools.
You keep focusing on Bullis' past, and those of us with children there who are happy, challenged in school (including all of last year when most were 100% virtual), who are tested every week, learning a lot with small class sizes and great teachers, as well as a fabulous new HOS, will just keep nodding and smiling. We know that the joke is on you
How could you ever know this? Unless you’re from the admin plugging Bullis as suspected by another poster…
Because the head of school over communicates and stresses transparency so he shares stats in his weekly newsletter.
Somewhat telling that he feels compelled to tout applicant numbers, no? Sounds like he’s the marketing lead.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not true. Turned down several hundreds of applicants last year, and have a 45% increase in applications this year, and, significantly less turnover than most private schools.
You keep focusing on Bullis' past, and those of us with children there who are happy, challenged in school (including all of last year when most were 100% virtual), who are tested every week, learning a lot with small class sizes and great teachers, as well as a fabulous new HOS, will just keep nodding and smiling. We know that the joke is on you
How could you ever know this? Unless you’re from the admin plugging Bullis as suspected by another poster…
Because the head of school over communicates and stresses transparency so he shares stats in his weekly newsletter.
Somewhat telling that he feels compelled to tout applicant numbers, no? Sounds like he’s the marketing lead.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not true. Turned down several hundreds of applicants last year, and have a 45% increase in applications this year, and, significantly less turnover than most private schools.
You keep focusing on Bullis' past, and those of us with children there who are happy, challenged in school (including all of last year when most were 100% virtual), who are tested every week, learning a lot with small class sizes and great teachers, as well as a fabulous new HOS, will just keep nodding and smiling. We know that the joke is on you
How could you ever know this? Unless you’re from the admin plugging Bullis as suspected by another poster…
Because the head of school over communicates and stresses transparency so he shares stats in his weekly newsletter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not true. Turned down several hundreds of applicants last year, and have a 45% increase in applications this year, and, significantly less turnover than most private schools.
You keep focusing on Bullis' past, and those of us with children there who are happy, challenged in school (including all of last year when most were 100% virtual), who are tested every week, learning a lot with small class sizes and great teachers, as well as a fabulous new HOS, will just keep nodding and smiling. We know that the joke is on you
How could you ever know this? Unless you’re from the admin plugging Bullis as suspected by another poster…
Anonymous wrote:Not true. Turned down several hundreds of applicants last year, and have a 45% increase in applications this year, and, significantly less turnover than most private schools.
You keep focusing on Bullis' past, and those of us with children there who are happy, challenged in school (including all of last year when most were 100% virtual), who are tested every week, learning a lot with small class sizes and great teachers, as well as a fabulous new HOS, will just keep nodding and smiling. We know that the joke is on you
Anonymous wrote:Not true. Turned down several hundreds of applicants last year, and have a 45% increase in applications this year, and, significantly less turnover than most private schools.
You keep focusing on Bullis' past, and those of us with children there who are happy, challenged in school (including all of last year when most were 100% virtual), who are tested every week, learning a lot with small class sizes and great teachers, as well as a fabulous new HOS, will just keep nodding and smiling. We know that the joke is on you
Anonymous wrote:Bullis was taking another with a pulse and a checkbook during Covid. So, the “standards” were watered down.
Anonymous wrote:The problem at Bullis is that, for as long as it has existed, it has prioritized athletics. While there are certainly academically capable athletes, there has always been a wide range of ability in the classroom (particularly in the high school). When we were (briefly) there they were responding with a robust learning support program and on-site tutors who work with the athletes. Lots of money available went to athletes from around the area. While none of this is negative, it created a school with a huge range in the classroom. Some families we know also left because it did not cater to the high achievers. And while some of the Ivy admits were non-athletes, many were strong athletes who did well enough.
There is a new Head of School and they are touting a renewed focus on academics. But football still rules. Covid and the MCPS has given them the best admission seasons they could have hoped for. This happened everywhere in MoCo so it is wrong of Bullis to say it is a reflection of the School. It is the exodus from public schools of families who can pay for private. Any other story is just not accurate and the school knows that. Covid was and continues to be a windfall for Bullis. There just aren't that many non-parochial private schools in Montgomery County for high school.
So, is it a risk worth taking? Visit and see but know that Bullis has a long history to overcome. There are so many academically strong schools in the DMV. I personally wanted my under-challenged student to go to a school that had a track record and a culture of excellence. It was the right decision for us and one I would make again.