Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem with having higher cutoffs for center schools is … any of the local school kids found eligible can now go to the center… but if you have a center full of a 140 plus class it will move at a totally different pace than a class with 120 level iq.
This really only makes sense if centers did not exist.
I don't think it's just the center schools that have higher cut-offs. Looks like it's all the higher-SES schools. Unless your center is fed by a mix of high-income and Title I schools, this doesn't seem likely to be an issue.
Anonymous wrote:The problem with having higher cutoffs for center schools is … any of the local school kids found eligible can now go to the center… but if you have a center full of a 140 plus class it will move at a totally different pace than a class with 120 level iq.
This really only makes sense if centers did not exist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem with having higher cutoffs for center schools is … any of the local school kids found eligible can now go to the center… but if you have a center full of a 140 plus class it will move at a totally different pace than a class with 120 level iq.
This really only makes sense if centers did not exist.
...which jives with rumors that FCPS eventually plans to do away with the centers.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t think there is a whole lot more to it but yet I think it just being so unclear and poorly communicated is creating some confusion/unease/distrust. I think that is unfortunate since it could have been handled better to avoid that. Handling it they way they have makes it look like a bigger deal and mess than it is.
Anonymous wrote:The problem with having higher cutoffs for center schools is … any of the local school kids found eligible can now go to the center… but if you have a center full of a 140 plus class it will move at a totally different pace than a class with 120 level iq.
This really only makes sense if centers did not exist.
Anonymous wrote:While I agree that FCPS did a poor job of communicating this change, could someone please help me to understand why this is such a big deal? Whether one’s child is in-pool or parent-referred, doesn’t the child’s file get reviewed by the same AAP committee? I didn’t think there was any advantage of being in pool, other than the automatic referral.
Or, is there something more to this? Does this mean there are fewer spots available in AAP? During our school’s AAP presentation, they emphasized that there is no quota and that anyone who is deemed eligible can be in AAP, so I didn’t think this was the case.
Anonymous wrote:While I agree that FCPS did a poor job of communicating this change, could someone please help me to understand why this is such a big deal? Whether one’s child is in-pool or parent-referred, doesn’t the child’s file get reviewed by the same AAP committee? I didn’t think there was any advantage of being in pool, other than the automatic referral.
Or, is there something more to this? Does this mean there are fewer spots available in AAP? During our school’s AAP presentation, they emphasized that there is no quota and that anyone who is deemed eligible can be in AAP, so I didn’t think this was the case.
Anonymous wrote:Wow hard to believe 140 is not in pool. Something isn't right. Time to reach out to your school board members for transparency in the process.