Anonymous wrote:The UC decision will have ripple effects throughout the college industry. And it is an industry - one that is in dire need of a reset of some kind. CA is big enough that it will influence other schools' decisions - one of the test prep firms that spoke my DC's (public) school told us this pre-pandemic (at that time the UCs required SAT w/essay, and they were predicting that if CA dropped it, it would be the death knell for the essay part of the test entirely.)
I understand why people take some comfort in the test scores, especially if they have high-scoring kids. But I've seen first-hand how intensive test prep can completely change the outcome. All you need is money - we spent thousands but it got our kid from a 26 composite to 31. It's insane how much money biases the whole process, but it's especially true around test scores.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The fewer objective measurements, the more opaque cherry-picking they can do.
And in the near future, you'll wonder why they have way fewer Asian students graduates...
It’s not objective. You can game the test, pay for test tutoring and increase scores. The only proven correlation between SATs and ACTs is income.
That isn’t true, the UC system itself recently produced research showing high correlation between SAT scores and performance in college. It’s more predictive than high school grades. Hi
link?
Halfway through the bullet points— “without controlling for demographics,” SAT/ACT score are a better predictor of college grades than high school gpa. https://www.ucop.edu/institutional-research-academic-planning/_files/sat-act-study-report.pdf
but like...demographics exist?
Maybe actually read the report?
They also concluded that adding sat/act to high school gpa materially improved ability to predict college performance.
Without controlling for student demographics, SAT/ACT scores are a stronger predictor of freshman GPA when compared to HSGPA, but have almost the same explanatory power of graduation GPA, first year retention and graduation. After controlling for student demographics, HSGPA and test scores have the same explanatory power of the freshman GPA for 2015, the latest year included in this study, but HSGPA is a stronger predictor of the first year retention, graduation GPA and four-year graduation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The fewer objective measurements, the more opaque cherry-picking they can do.
And in the near future, you'll wonder why they have way fewer Asian students graduates...
It’s not objective. You can game the test, pay for test tutoring and increase scores. The only proven correlation between SATs and ACTs is income.
That isn’t true, the UC system itself recently produced research showing high correlation between SAT scores and performance in college. It’s more predictive than high school grades. Hi
link?
Halfway through the bullet points— “without controlling for demographics,” SAT/ACT score are a better predictor of college grades than high school gpa. https://www.ucop.edu/institutional-research-academic-planning/_files/sat-act-study-report.pdf
but like...demographics exist?
Maybe actually read the report?
They also concluded that adding sat/act to high school gpa materially improved ability to predict college performance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The fewer objective measurements, the more opaque cherry-picking they can do.
And in the near future, you'll wonder why they have way fewer Asian students graduates...
It’s not objective. You can game the test, pay for test tutoring and increase scores. The only proven correlation between SATs and ACTs is income.
That isn’t true, the UC system itself recently produced research showing high correlation between SAT scores and performance in college. It’s more predictive than high school grades. Hi
link?
Halfway through the bullet points— “without controlling for demographics,” SAT/ACT score are a better predictor of college grades than high school gpa. https://www.ucop.edu/institutional-research-academic-planning/_files/sat-act-study-report.pdf
but like...demographics exist?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it's fantastic. Study after study after study has confirmed the high correlation between family income and parental education and SAT and ACT scores. Generally speaking, high scores were born on third base. It doesn't make them any smarter.
This will hurt immigrant and low-SES kids who have the smarts to do well on the SAT.
- Ivy League grad immigrant kid who’s parents didn’t go past grade school
No, it won't. It'll help them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The fewer objective measurements, the more opaque cherry-picking they can do.
And in the near future, you'll wonder why they have way fewer Asian students graduates...
It’s not objective. You can game the test, pay for test tutoring and increase scores. The only proven correlation between SATs and ACTs is income.
That isn’t true, the UC system itself recently produced research showing high correlation between SAT scores and performance in college. It’s more predictive than high school grades. Hi
link?
Halfway through the bullet points— “without controlling for demographics,” SAT/ACT score are a better predictor of college grades than high school gpa. https://www.ucop.edu/institutional-research-academic-planning/_files/sat-act-study-report.pdf
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The fewer objective measurements, the more opaque cherry-picking they can do.
And in the near future, you'll wonder why they have way fewer Asian students graduates...
It’s not objective. You can game the test, pay for test tutoring and increase scores. The only proven correlation between SATs and ACTs is income.
That isn’t true, the UC system itself recently produced research showing high correlation between SAT scores and performance in college. It’s more predictive than high school grades. Hi
link?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The fewer objective measurements, the more opaque cherry-picking they can do.
And in the near future, you'll wonder why they have way fewer Asian students graduates...
It’s not objective. You can game the test, pay for test tutoring and increase scores. The only proven correlation between SATs and ACTs is income.
An 1100 can’t game their way into a 1500. A kid could go up 100 points or something, but it’s not hugely significant. The people who will lose out are the smart kids in not-great schools or not-great backgrounds who will lose out on the opportunity to show what they are capable of in an objective way. There will be shining stars who miss out on opportunities to rise out of their circumstances due to this change. It’s not the win that people arguing for it think it is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The fewer objective measurements, the more opaque cherry-picking they can do.
And in the near future, you'll wonder why they have way fewer Asian students graduates...
It’s not objective. You can game the test, pay for test tutoring and increase scores. The only proven correlation between SATs and ACTs is income.
That isn’t true, the UC system itself recently produced research showing high correlation between SAT scores and performance in college. It’s more predictive than high school grades. Hi
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The fewer objective measurements, the more opaque cherry-picking they can do.
And in the near future, you'll wonder why they have way fewer Asian students graduates...
It’s not objective. You can game the test, pay for test tutoring and increase scores. The only proven correlation between SATs and ACTs is income.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The fewer objective measurements, the more opaque cherry-picking they can do.
And in the near future, you'll wonder why they have way fewer Asian students graduates...
It’s not objective. You can game the test, pay for test tutoring and increase scores. The only proven correlation between SATs and ACTs is income.
An 1100 can’t game their way into a 1500. A kid could go up 100 points or something, but it’s not hugely significant. The people who will lose out are the smart kids in not-great schools or not-great backgrounds who will lose out on the opportunity to show what they are capable of in an objective way. There will be shining stars who miss out on opportunities to rise out of their circumstances due to this change. It’s not the win that people arguing for it think it is.
Exactly. Or those who don’t have the parents able to play the new game. Sad