Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Correct me if I am wrong, but Richmond also lacks any major league sports franchises. Another drawback of a small city.
For some.
No major league sports. They do have a minor league baseball team and two division 1 college sports teams. They do have a NASCAR track and you can make fun of RIR all you want but I have been to some races in the pit and they’re fun (and I don’t know anything re NASCAR). You are 90 min (or less) from the beach. You are about an hour from the mountains.
I am from Richmond and my entire family still lives there so I go back a lot. It’s a lot more happening and fun then when I lived there.
I also have lived and worked in Baltimore and to each their own but it was not a wonderful place to live, at all.
Anonymous wrote:Less than 800k in Richmond city proper in a pretty house with large isn’t going to happen. Also if you think dc is dead at night you likely are as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Correct me if I am wrong, but Richmond also lacks any major league sports franchises. Another drawback of a small city.
For some.
No major league sports. They do have a minor league baseball team and two division 1 college sports teams. They do have a NASCAR track and you can make fun of RIR all you want but I have been to some races in the pit and they’re fun (and I don’t know anything re NASCAR). You are 90 min (or less) from the beach. You are about an hour from the mountains.
I am from Richmond and my entire family still lives there so I go back a lot. It’s a lot more happening and fun then when I lived there.
I also have lived and worked in Baltimore and to each their own but it was not a wonderful place to live, at all.
Anonymous wrote:It's not insignificant - Richmond is very proud of their history supporting Big Tobacco.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Correct me if I am wrong, but Richmond also lacks any major league sports franchises. Another drawback of a small city.
For some.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are people offended that Richmond is being referenced as a second-tier city? I thought it was. Most people who move there from the DC area are looking for a less expensive city. There's nothing wrong with that.
By size (half the population of DC or Baltimore)., Richmond is more of a third tier city. Nothing wrong with that. But pretending it’s similar in amount of amenities is a bit dishonest. What is the airport situation?
Aside from the airports, what are these amenities you speak of?
Don’t be disingenuous. If it’s so hard for you to think of the amenities you may need to post on a different forum.
There’s nothing wrong with Richmond but it’s weird for ppl to act like it’s equivalent to DC, which is the nation’s Capital. While Richmond was the capital of a desired different countries long ago it’s not the same.
You need to relax. No one is making the claim that Richmond is the equivalent of Washington, DC or god forbid Baltimore (yikes), but you seem really bent out of shape with posters posting pros and recommendations re Richmond. What gives? It is just irrational to completely dismiss anything about Richmond. I believe the OP wanted to know why someone should relocate there, what it has to offer, etc. So posters are listing that. I can't wrap my head around why posters are such snobs and elitists and want to throw shade at every single positive Richmond post. So immature. Just because some posters like Richmond and have reasons why it might be a nice place to live doesn't mean anything about DC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Richmond metropolitan area has over 1.2 million people. It's not some tiny, rural area (not that there is anything wrong with tiny, rural areas). It is a state capital with a state government, has an international airport (not a huge airport but a decent airport), multiple great universities including a good medical school and children's hospital, an award wining fine arts museum, lots of river sports, great restaurant scene, a federal reserve, a NASCAR track, home of the Martin Agency (which does the great Geico commercials), the state fair, several Fortune 500 companies, etc.
Is it the perfect place to live, I don't know but it's not a horrible place with nothing to do.
Still half the size of DC or Baltimore, both of which aren’t large cities themselves. And having a whooping one museum is better than none but certainly can’t compete with DC or even Baltimore.
I’m sure it’s a pleasant place to live for those who want a slower pace of life and can be happy with a small city. But let’s acknowledge it’s limitations too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are people offended that Richmond is being referenced as a second-tier city? I thought it was. Most people who move there from the DC area are looking for a less expensive city. There's nothing wrong with that.
By size (half the population of DC or Baltimore)., Richmond is more of a third tier city. Nothing wrong with that. But pretending it’s similar in amount of amenities is a bit dishonest. What is the airport situation?
Aside from the airports, what are these amenities you speak of?
Don’t be disingenuous. If it’s so hard for you to think of the amenities you may need to post on a different forum.
There’s nothing wrong with Richmond but it’s weird for ppl to act like it’s equivalent to DC, which is the nation’s Capital. While Richmond was the capital of a desired different countries long ago it’s not the same.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are people offended that Richmond is being referenced as a second-tier city? I thought it was. Most people who move there from the DC area are looking for a less expensive city. There's nothing wrong with that.
By size (half the population of DC or Baltimore)., Richmond is more of a third tier city. Nothing wrong with that. But pretending it’s similar in amount of amenities is a bit dishonest. What is the airport situation?
Aside from the airports, what are these amenities you speak of?
Don’t be disingenuous. If it’s so hard for you to think of the amenities you may need to post on a different forum.
There’s nothing wrong with Richmond but it’s weird for ppl to act like it’s equivalent to DC, which is the nation’s Capital. While Richmond was the capital of a desired different countries long ago it’s not the same.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are people offended that Richmond is being referenced as a second-tier city? I thought it was. Most people who move there from the DC area are looking for a less expensive city. There's nothing wrong with that.
By size (half the population of DC or Baltimore)., Richmond is more of a third tier city. Nothing wrong with that. But pretending it’s similar in amount of amenities is a bit dishonest. What is the airport situation?
Aside from the airports, what are these amenities you speak of?
Anonymous wrote:Correct me if I am wrong, but Richmond also lacks any major league sports franchises. Another drawback of a small city.
Anonymous wrote:The Richmond metropolitan area has over 1.2 million people. It's not some tiny, rural area (not that there is anything wrong with tiny, rural areas). It is a state capital with a state government, has an international airport (not a huge airport but a decent airport), multiple great universities including a good medical school and children's hospital, an award wining fine arts museum, lots of river sports, great restaurant scene, a federal reserve, a NASCAR track, home of the Martin Agency (which does the great Geico commercials), the state fair, several Fortune 500 companies, etc.
Is it the perfect place to live, I don't know but it's not a horrible place with nothing to do.