Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Top privates: HYPSM
Top public: Berkeley, Michigan, UCLA, etc
If cost is the same, there is no question about choosing MIT, Harvard and Stanford over any public. For Yale and Princeton, it may depend on the majors. For example, I can see people choose Berkeley over Yale for CS.
By making this distinction, you're making it obvious that even the very best publics are several tiers below the best privates...
NP here and when it comes to HYPSM they are. Let’s be honest here. Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford and MIT have an unmatched cache for life and all over the world.
Did you read the thread on feeder schools for Wall Street and Silicon Valley? HYPSM are not very well represented. Only Columbia ranks high on both.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Top privates: HYPSM
Top public: Berkeley, Michigan, UCLA, etc
If cost is the same, there is no question about choosing MIT, Harvard and Stanford over any public. For Yale and Princeton, it may depend on the majors. For example, I can see people choose Berkeley over Yale for CS.
By making this distinction, you're making it obvious that even the very best publics are several tiers below the best privates...
NP here and when it comes to HYPSM they are. Let’s be honest here. Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford and MIT have an unmatched cache for life and all over the world.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Top privates: HYPSM
Top public: Berkeley, Michigan, UCLA, etc
If cost is the same, there is no question about choosing MIT, Harvard and Stanford over any public. For Yale and Princeton, it may depend on the majors. For example, I can see people choose Berkeley over Yale for CS.
By making this distinction, you're making it obvious that even the very best publics are several tiers below the best privates...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Top privates: HYPSM
Top public: Berkeley, Michigan, UCLA, etc
If cost is the same, there is no question about choosing MIT, Harvard and Stanford over any public. For Yale and Princeton, it may depend on the majors. For example, I can see people choose Berkeley over Yale for CS.
Even to major CS, I would choose Yale over Berkeley without a slight hesitation. All undergrad CS courses at the T25 schools are more or less same, and research opportunities are plenty in those resourseful schools for an undergrad. But the overall undergraduate education experience at the two schools is hugely different, and frankly the experience at Yale is way better while you may have hard time even getting to some classes you want. Yes, prestige does play a role in my decision as well if I would pay that much to attend.
No one cares where you go to school for computer science. They really don't care about prestige.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Top privates: HYPSM
Top public: Berkeley, Michigan, UCLA, etc
If cost is the same, there is no question about choosing MIT, Harvard and Stanford over any public. For Yale and Princeton, it may depend on the majors. For example, I can see people choose Berkeley over Yale for CS.
Even to major CS, I would choose Yale over Berkeley without a slight hesitation. All undergrad CS courses at the T25 schools are more or less same, and research opportunities are plenty in those resourseful schools for an undergrad. But the overall undergraduate education experience at the two schools is hugely different, and frankly the experience at Yale is way better while you may have hard time even getting to some classes you want. Yes, prestige does play a role in my decision as well if I would pay that much to attend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Top privates: HYPSM
Top public: Berkeley, Michigan, UCLA, etc
If cost is the same, there is no question about choosing MIT, Harvard and Stanford over any public. For Yale and Princeton, it may depend on the majors. For example, I can see people choose Berkeley over Yale for CS.
Even to major CS, I would choose Yale over Berkeley without a slight hesitation. All undergrad CS courses at the T25 schools are more or less same, and research opportunities are plenty in those resourseful schools for an undergrad. But the overall undergraduate education experience at the two schools is hugely different, and frankly the experience at Yale is way better while you may have hard time even getting to some classes you want. Yes, prestige does play a role in my decision as well if I would pay that much to attend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Top privates: HYPSM
Top public: Berkeley, Michigan, UCLA, etc
If cost is the same, there is no question about choosing MIT, Harvard and Stanford over any public. For Yale and Princeton, it may depend on the majors. For example, I can see people choose Berkeley over Yale for CS.
By making this distinction, you're making it obvious that even the very best publics are several tiers below the best privates...
NP here and when it comes to HYPSM they are. Let’s be honest here. Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford and MIT have an unmatched cache for life and all over the world.
Anonymous wrote:Top privates: HYPSM
Top public: Berkeley, Michigan, UCLA, etc
If cost is the same, there is no question about choosing MIT, Harvard and Stanford over any public. For Yale and Princeton, it may depend on the majors. For example, I can see people choose Berkeley over Yale for CS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Top privates: HYPSM
Top public: Berkeley, Michigan, UCLA, etc
If cost is the same, there is no question about choosing MIT, Harvard and Stanford over any public. For Yale and Princeton, it may depend on the majors. For example, I can see people choose Berkeley over Yale for CS.
By making this distinction, you're making it obvious that even the very best publics are several tiers below the best privates...
Anonymous wrote:Private undergrad, public graduate school (for anything but law, then any the highest t-14 they could into, whether private or public).
Anonymous wrote:Top privates: HYPSM
Top public: Berkeley, Michigan, UCLA, etc
If cost is the same, there is no question about choosing MIT, Harvard and Stanford over any public. For Yale and Princeton, it may depend on the majors. For example, I can see people choose Berkeley over Yale for CS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A top private. No question. The professors are more involved with undergraduates and the research opportunities are unquestionably more available to undergrads.
PS since when is UVA a “top school”? No one outside this area ever thinks or considers it.
Many of the top privates universities have more graduate students than undergraduate. This is the opposite of all of the top publics that serve both. Do you honestly believe the professors at Harvard, for example, are spending more time with undergrads than grad students? Research opportunities are very abundant at a school like Michigan. Only JHU has a larger research budget. You are misinformed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread would be useful if it asked if one prefers public vs. private, assuming no cost difference. But, by noting specific schools, OP really wants to start another useless rankings/prestige thread.
Yes they are and slyly wants to equate Berkeley and Michigan to U CHICAGO AND PENN?!?!
But most people assume UChicago and UPenn are state schools. These two schools almost have no lay recognition, though Wharton is very well known.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A top private. No question. The professors are more involved with undergraduates and the research opportunities are unquestionably more available to undergrads.
PS since when is UVA a “top school”? No one outside this area ever thinks or considers it.
You are terribly misinformed. The overwhelming number of UVA applicants are from OOS.