Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guys, she's not canceled. She went to Obama's birthday. He disinvited everyone- his top advisor, Nancy Pelosi, David Letterman, Larry David-- and Chrissy Teigan was still invited. She's firmly rooted as a Royal Celebrity. Settle in and get used to it.
Hi Chrissy. How many times have you posted in this thread?
Anonymous wrote:Guys, she's not canceled. She went to Obama's birthday. He disinvited everyone- his top advisor, Nancy Pelosi, David Letterman, Larry David-- and Chrissy Teigan was still invited. She's firmly rooted as a Royal Celebrity. Settle in and get used to it.
Anonymous wrote:I’m a big believer in redemption and encouraging people to become better and do good in the world. Not a fan of cancel culture. Why would anyone change if they’re always held at the level of the worst thing they’ve ever said? If she wants to redeem herself, let her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Shrug I like her fine. I don’t believe in canceling or deplatforming. If someone creates content I want to consume, let it stand on its merits.
So you would buy a cookbook from Brett Kavanaugh? If an avowed Nazi ran a fun, irreverent Twitter account where they shared juicy celebrity gossip and useful hair and makeup tips, you'd follow?
Or you just don't really care what you did? These are different things.
Your comparing rude comments to assault and Nazis.
The PP said "I don't believe in canceling or deplatforming. If someone creates content I want to consume, let it stand on its merits." This is an insanely broad statement and what I wrote proves that it cannot possibly be true.
What the PP actually thinks is that what Teigen did is not that big of a deal so she doesn't care to reduce your consumption of what she deems to be good content because of it. That's different that not believing in deplatforming or thinking content should only be evaluated on it's own merits. Everyone has a line. It's just Tiegen has not crossed PP's line.
Yea she was rude she’s a model. It’s not complex.
Repeatedly going after a kid and telling her to kill herself isn’t rude. Teigen is trash. She’s whored out her miscarriage for pity and likes. F her.
You sound unhinged
You sound like the idiot you evidently are. I don’t follow her trashbag antics, but her horseshit “forgive me guys” tour has been discussed on sites I read. She’s a blocky blow-fish faced sociopath, a sick sack of shit. CT is her husband’s plus one to things like Obama’s birthday, but she herself is dumpster water. She wasn’t “mean” or “rude,” she stalked a damaged person through their SM and was cruel over years. She criticized a young black girl politely correcting her name’s pronunciation and liked comments about the kid being a c-word. F her. I look forward to her transformation into Pumpkinhead, pimping her miscarriage to try and force people to “like” her and buy a pity cookbook.
Whoa. You might want to take a long look in the mirror. Read your statements again and then ask if what you're doing is much different than what you're accusing her of.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Shrug I like her fine. I don’t believe in canceling or deplatforming. If someone creates content I want to consume, let it stand on its merits.
So you would buy a cookbook from Brett Kavanaugh? If an avowed Nazi ran a fun, irreverent Twitter account where they shared juicy celebrity gossip and useful hair and makeup tips, you'd follow?
Or you just don't really care what you did? These are different things.
Your comparing rude comments to assault and Nazis.
The PP said "I don't believe in canceling or deplatforming. If someone creates content I want to consume, let it stand on its merits." This is an insanely broad statement and what I wrote proves that it cannot possibly be true.
What the PP actually thinks is that what Teigen did is not that big of a deal so she doesn't care to reduce your consumption of what she deems to be good content because of it. That's different that not believing in deplatforming or thinking content should only be evaluated on it's own merits. Everyone has a line. It's just Tiegen has not crossed PP's line.
Yea she was rude she’s a model. It’s not complex.
Repeatedly going after a kid and telling her to kill herself isn’t rude. Teigen is trash. She’s whored out her miscarriage for pity and likes. F her.
You sound unhinged
You sound like the idiot you evidently are. I don’t follow her trashbag antics, but her horseshit “forgive me guys” tour has been discussed on sites I read. She’s a blocky blow-fish faced sociopath, a sick sack of shit. CT is her husband’s plus one to things like Obama’s birthday, but she herself is dumpster water. She wasn’t “mean” or “rude,” she stalked a damaged person through their SM and was cruel over years. She criticized a young black girl politely correcting her name’s pronunciation and liked comments about the kid being a c-word. F her. I look forward to her transformation into Pumpkinhead, pimping her miscarriage to try and force people to “like” her and buy a pity cookbook.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Shrug I like her fine. I don’t believe in canceling or deplatforming. If someone creates content I want to consume, let it stand on its merits.
So you would buy a cookbook from Brett Kavanaugh? If an avowed Nazi ran a fun, irreverent Twitter account where they shared juicy celebrity gossip and useful hair and makeup tips, you'd follow?
Or you just don't really care what you did? These are different things.
Your comparing rude comments to assault and Nazis.
The PP said "I don't believe in canceling or deplatforming. If someone creates content I want to consume, let it stand on its merits." This is an insanely broad statement and what I wrote proves that it cannot possibly be true.
What the PP actually thinks is that what Teigen did is not that big of a deal so she doesn't care to reduce your consumption of what she deems to be good content because of it. That's different that not believing in deplatforming or thinking content should only be evaluated on it's own merits. Everyone has a line. It's just Tiegen has not crossed PP's line.
Yea she was rude she’s a model. It’s not complex.
Repeatedly going after a kid and telling her to kill herself isn’t rude. Teigen is trash. She’s whored out her miscarriage for pity and likes. F her.
You sound unhinged
You sound like the idiot you evidently are. I don’t follow her trashbag antics, but her horseshit “forgive me guys” tour has been discussed on sites I read. She’s a blocky blow-fish faced sociopath, a sick sack of shit. CT is her husband’s plus one to things like Obama’s birthday, but she herself is dumpster water. She wasn’t “mean” or “rude,” she stalked a damaged person through their SM and was cruel over years. She criticized a young black girl politely correcting her name’s pronunciation and liked comments about the kid being a c-word. F her. I look forward to her transformation into Pumpkinhead, pimping her miscarriage to try and force people to “like” her and buy a pity cookbook.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Shrug I like her fine. I don’t believe in canceling or deplatforming. If someone creates content I want to consume, let it stand on its merits.
So you would buy a cookbook from Brett Kavanaugh? If an avowed Nazi ran a fun, irreverent Twitter account where they shared juicy celebrity gossip and useful hair and makeup tips, you'd follow?
Or you just don't really care what you did? These are different things.
Your comparing rude comments to assault and Nazis.
The PP said "I don't believe in canceling or deplatforming. If someone creates content I want to consume, let it stand on its merits." This is an insanely broad statement and what I wrote proves that it cannot possibly be true.
What the PP actually thinks is that what Teigen did is not that big of a deal so she doesn't care to reduce your consumption of what she deems to be good content because of it. That's different that not believing in deplatforming or thinking content should only be evaluated on it's own merits. Everyone has a line. It's just Tiegen has not crossed PP's line.
Yea she was rude she’s a model. It’s not complex.
Repeatedly going after a kid and telling her to kill herself isn’t rude. Teigen is trash. She’s whored out her miscarriage for pity and likes. F her.
You sound unhinged
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Shrug I like her fine. I don’t believe in canceling or deplatforming. If someone creates content I want to consume, let it stand on its merits.
So you would buy a cookbook from Brett Kavanaugh? If an avowed Nazi ran a fun, irreverent Twitter account where they shared juicy celebrity gossip and useful hair and makeup tips, you'd follow?
Or you just don't really care what you did? These are different things.
Your comparing rude comments to assault and Nazis.
The PP said "I don't believe in canceling or deplatforming. If someone creates content I want to consume, let it stand on its merits." This is an insanely broad statement and what I wrote proves that it cannot possibly be true.
What the PP actually thinks is that what Teigen did is not that big of a deal so she doesn't care to reduce your consumption of what she deems to be good content because of it. That's different that not believing in deplatforming or thinking content should only be evaluated on it's own merits. Everyone has a line. It's just Tiegen has not crossed PP's line.
Yea she was rude she’s a model. It’s not complex.
Repeatedly going after a kid and telling her to kill herself isn’t rude. Teigen is trash. She’s whored out her miscarriage for pity and likes. F her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Shrug I like her fine. I don’t believe in canceling or deplatforming. If someone creates content I want to consume, let it stand on its merits.
So you would buy a cookbook from Brett Kavanaugh? If an avowed Nazi ran a fun, irreverent Twitter account where they shared juicy celebrity gossip and useful hair and makeup tips, you'd follow?
Or you just don't really care what you did? These are different things.
Your comparing rude comments to assault and Nazis.
The PP said "I don't believe in canceling or deplatforming. If someone creates content I want to consume, let it stand on its merits." This is an insanely broad statement and what I wrote proves that it cannot possibly be true.
What the PP actually thinks is that what Teigen did is not that big of a deal so she doesn't care to reduce your consumption of what she deems to be good content because of it. That's different that not believing in deplatforming or thinking content should only be evaluated on it's own merits. Everyone has a line. It's just Tiegen has not crossed PP's line.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a big believer in redemption and encouraging people to become better and do good in the world. Not a fan of cancel culture. Why would anyone change if they’re always held at the level of the worst thing they’ve ever said? If she wants to redeem herself, let her.
+1. I think it’s also quite possible that her drinking was part of her toxicity and hopefully her speaking out about sobriety will lead to a more productive path for her, helping not harming.