Anonymous wrote:hahaha you guys this is great.
i love watching you all put each other down and attempting to sound smart about literature. none of you are doing this right
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the value of Shakespeare in the curriculum? Is it for your nostalgic reasons? Just because it’s always been done, does that mean it’s always been right? Do you want to still teach Columbus as a savior and hero?
Because one cannot be properly educated in English literature without an understanding of Shakespeare.
Reason number 363,724,623,629,252 my kids are in private schools. DS 12th grade is having an entire semester of Shakespeare.
Disagree. If you mean England and their version of events sure. I suppose some exposure to the plays would be helpful culturally. But, the ONLY reason he is so "important" is because of the push to make him important. Their are tons of other better authors and more interesting books for youth than Shakespeare. And, yes I read in school, I took 2 terms of old English and Shakespeare and the like... I enjoyed it.. but I also enjoyed taking Native American lit, African and Middle eastern, women in lit and South America lit.. truthfully more of that or at least more inclusive lit classes and less time on old dead white guys would have been better.
Anonymous wrote:OP, pretty sure they read The Tempest in 10th at SWW...at least mine did. Have you asked?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Last year, my DC read “Romeo and Juliet” at Wilson. That was ninth grade.
Is taking English next semester. We shall see.
Almost all the books my 6th and 9th graders (Deal and Wilson) are assigned (or required to choose from) are tendentiously promoting the new notion of "equity"...
The fact that you managed to go through school without realizing equity was a notion people had is probably a sign the curriculum needed to be changed.
Anonymous wrote:It’s interesting, I was in AP English through HS or college and Shakespeare did not make a difference in my life other than it was interesting for me to think about and read.
I promise Shakespeare isn’t the only author who helps student’s comprehension. The fact that there is a whole thread on this is a testament to white privilege.
And yes, I am bringing race into it because once again, you fail to see how complaining about this makes you look. Mostly not that it was asked but the ignorant comments alluding to teaching about black, brown, Asian, native people is ‘too political.’
And we live in a politically charged world, everything is actually about politics. So yes there will be more and more minority authors studied that YOU, old white mom, may not have studied and that’s ok.
Your child will not fall into a cesspool of illiteracy and lack critical thinking.
Also who says Shakespeare isn’t being studied? I graduated from walls less than 5 years ago and I did study Shakespeare.
Anonymous wrote:It’s interesting, I was in AP English through HS or college and Shakespeare did not make a difference in my life other than it was interesting for me to think about and read.
I promise Shakespeare isn’t the only author who helps student’s comprehension. The fact that there is a whole thread on this is a testament to white privilege.
And yes, I am bringing race into it because once again, you fail to see how complaining about this makes you look. Mostly not that it was asked but the ignorant comments alluding to teaching about black, brown, Asian, native people is ‘too political.’
And we live in a politically charged world, everything is actually about politics. So yes there will be more and more minority authors studied that YOU, old white mom, may not have studied and that’s ok.
Your child will not fall into a cesspool of illiteracy and lack critical thinking.
Also who says Shakespeare isn’t being studied? I graduated from walls less than 5 years ago and I did study Shakespeare.
Anonymous wrote:It’s interesting, I was in AP English through HS or college and Shakespeare did not make a difference in my life other than it was interesting for me to think about and read.
I promise Shakespeare isn’t the only author who helps student’s comprehension. The fact that there is a whole thread on this is a testament to white privilege.
And yes, I am bringing race into it because once again, you fail to see how complaining about this makes you look. Mostly not that it was asked but the ignorant comments alluding to teaching about black, brown, Asian, native people is ‘too political.’
And we live in a politically charged world, everything is actually about politics. So yes there will be more and more minority authors studied that YOU, old white mom, may not have studied and that’s ok.
Your child will not fall into a cesspool of illiteracy and lack critical thinking.
Also who says Shakespeare isn’t being studied? I graduated from walls less than 5 years ago and I did study Shakespeare.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Last year, my DC read “Romeo and Juliet” at Wilson. That was ninth grade.
Is taking English next semester. We shall see.
Almost all the books my 6th and 9th graders (Deal and Wilson) are assigned (or required to choose from) are tendentiously promoting the new notion of "equity"...
Anonymous wrote:We don’t care about him, he’s boring.