Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I just looked up what 21 Questions is.
It's different from 20 Questions.
You ask each other get-to-know you questions. 21 of them.
I'd totally play 20 Questions via text. It would take little time a thought. But no, I wouldn't want to answer 21 Questions in a row about myself and my thoughts and my life philosophies. That sounds exhausting.
I'd rather do it over dinner, not text. I can see how it could be fun but I would want some interesting questions that may lead to back and forth conversation. I think that would be better to get to know someone and more fun.
Doing that over text. Kill me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m 40, OP, and I think this would be fun. But the fact that you don’t means you likely don’t define fun in the same way. That’s ok, just probably time to move on.
IT actually sounds like OP just isn't that into her, if he was he'd be cool with whatever way she wanted to connect with him. But he's doing the typical immature thing of blaming the other person.
This is my read too. If you had a good first date and were excited about the person, you'd just be glad they reached out and were thinking about you. If you're dissecting the manner of contact then you're just not that thrilled to hear from her. And deciding the contact was "juvenile" is a sign OP is nervous about dating a younger person in general and looking for reasons it's a bad idea.
Move on before you spend any more time, OP. If you're not happy to hear from someone you're dating this early in the relationship, it's not going to get better.
Anonymous wrote:She sounds annoying and infantile. I can imagine a teenager asking to play 21 questions over text but I could not be bothered to do that. Granted, I'm married with three kids and have a business to run so don't have time for that BS. OP, guess if you're not married, have no kids and don't really work then that could be your thing.
I wouldn't really be interested in someone like that at 40.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I just looked up what 21 Questions is.
It's different from 20 Questions.
You ask each other get-to-know you questions. 21 of them.
I'd totally play 20 Questions via text. It would take little time a thought. But no, I wouldn't want to answer 21 Questions in a row about myself and my thoughts and my life philosophies. That sounds exhausting.
I'd rather do it over dinner, not text. I can see how it could be fun but I would want some interesting questions that may lead to back and forth conversation. I think that would be better to get to know someone and more fun.
Doing that over text. Kill me.
I totally agree. Chit-chatting over a drink fine. 100+ lame texts when I could be reading a book or listening to a podcast at the airport... No.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I just looked up what 21 Questions is.
It's different from 20 Questions.
You ask each other get-to-know you questions. 21 of them.
I'd totally play 20 Questions via text. It would take little time a thought. But no, I wouldn't want to answer 21 Questions in a row about myself and my thoughts and my life philosophies. That sounds exhausting.
I'd rather do it over dinner, not text. I can see how it could be fun but I would want some interesting questions that may lead to back and forth conversation. I think that would be better to get to know someone and more fun.
Doing that over text. Kill me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You’re boring.
Find a woman your own age to watch Masterpiece Theatre with on the couch on Friday nights.
THIS
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m 40, OP, and I think this would be fun. But the fact that you don’t means you likely don’t define fun in the same way. That’s ok, just probably time to move on.
IT actually sounds like OP just isn't that into her, if he was he'd be cool with whatever way she wanted to connect with him. But he's doing the typical immature thing of blaming the other person.
Anonymous wrote:You’re boring.
Find a woman your own age to watch Masterpiece Theatre with on the couch on Friday nights.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m 40, OP, and I think this would be fun. But the fact that you don’t means you likely don’t define fun in the same way. That’s ok, just probably time to move on.
IT actually sounds like OP just isn't that into her, if he was he'd be cool with whatever way she wanted to connect with him. But he's doing the typical immature thing of blaming the other person.
It’s kind of the same thing though, no? If they were compatible this wouldn’t be an issue. But they aren’t.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m 40, OP, and I think this would be fun. But the fact that you don’t means you likely don’t define fun in the same way. That’s ok, just probably time to move on.
IT actually sounds like OP just isn't that into her, if he was he'd be cool with whatever way she wanted to connect with him. But he's doing the typical immature thing of blaming the other person.
Anonymous wrote:I’m 40 and she’s 31. She has her own place and is very smart (we work in the same niche industry actually). We had a great first date and plan on seeing each other next weekend. We haven’t really spoken that much in between dates, just a few texts here and there. Well today she texted me and said that she was waiting for her flight and wanted to know if I wanted to “play a game”. The game was 21 questions.
Maybe I’m over thinking here but asking to play 21 questions via text? That’s a bit juvenile don’t you think?