Anonymous wrote:...if the coach is even qualified and capable to train keeper skills in the first place.
Anonymous wrote:“Nice save” is not actual coaching. 😂
Also, don’t assume that practice time is going to be sufficient on its own to help your GK kid develop foot skills as some pps have suggested.
Anonymous wrote:To the OP,
If your son is dedicated to playing in the goalkeeper position, let him play the full games in goal for his team, but request that the club let him guest play in the field for their lower level teams.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GKs are a premium if your team is lucky enough to have a decent GK the coach should work with him/her as much as possible to keep them from jumping clubs. 1,6,and 9 in that order hardest positions to replace when you lose them.
+1. In my experience, a lot of coaches don't seem to value good GKs nearly enough. Not sure why that is but if I were a coach and I had a talented GK, I'd do whatever I could to keep that player on my team or at least, in my club. Every team needs one and it's not easy to find good GKs especially as kids get older.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even if your talented goalie is standing around with not much action, other parents will feel he has played the whole game. Hard for coaches to justify subbing your kid into a field position when there are others who may not be getting any playing time
I don't think that should be the case. They would likely swap a goalie in for a defensive position, which tend to get subbed out less.
On DC's team they tend to sub the goal into the mid field and all the field player families are really upset about this because it's a full roster. A few parents were fuming about it last game.
OP here,
I don't really understand this.
If my kid is in the goal, then the other goalie is in the rotation on the field. If the kids trade places, it's not leading to more kids competing for spots on the field, because someone else is taken out of that competition.
I can understand that if the other goalies don't actually want to play goalie (and I don't know if this is true or not) that kid/family would be upset. I think part of the problem is that the coach told us my kid would be one of several goalies. In reality, he seems to be the only specialist.
There are kids who don't play a full half of the game and if the goal keeper was getting field time in addition to playing goalie for half the game and sometimes playing the full game this would for sure make me furious with the club.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even if your talented goalie is standing around with not much action, other parents will feel he has played the whole game. Hard for coaches to justify subbing your kid into a field position when there are others who may not be getting any playing time
I don't think that should be the case. They would likely swap a goalie in for a defensive position, which tend to get subbed out less.
On DC's team they tend to sub the goal into the mid field and all the field player families are really upset about this because it's a full roster. A few parents were fuming about it last game.
OP here,
I don't really understand this.
If my kid is in the goal, then the other goalie is in the rotation on the field. If the kids trade places, it's not leading to more kids competing for spots on the field, because someone else is taken out of that competition.
I can understand that if the other goalies don't actually want to play goalie (and I don't know if this is true or not) that kid/family would be upset. I think part of the problem is that the coach told us my kid would be one of several goalies. In reality, he seems to be the only specialist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GKs are a premium if your team is lucky enough to have a decent GK the coach should work with him/her as much as possible to keep them from jumping clubs. 1,6,and 9 in that order hardest positions to replace when you lose them.
+1. In my experience, a lot of coaches don't seem to value good GKs nearly enough. Not sure why that is but if I were a coach and I had a talented GK, I'd do whatever I could to keep that player on my team or at least, in my club. Every team needs one and it's not easy to find good GKs especially as kids get older.
Anonymous wrote:GKs are a premium if your team is lucky enough to have a decent GK the coach should work with him/her as much as possible to keep them from jumping clubs. 1,6,and 9 in that order hardest positions to replace when you lose them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Two things, first -- practice time working on field skills is more important than game time on the field. As long as your GK is regularly practicing with their teammates and working on foot skills, passing, etc. during practice (and outside of practice), they should continue to develop. Passing drills and small-sided games are great places for your kid to get "field" touches outside of games.
Second, the reason why GK coaches recommend field playing time at younger ages is because young teams don't play through the keeper like older teams do. If your kid's team plays out from the back and through the keeper (like they should be doing at u13) your keeper should be getting a lot of "foot" touches during the games. If they don't -- that could be a sign to look for another club/team.
Of course, getting field playing time when your keeper is not in goal is ideal, but it sometimes isn't feasible as the keepers get older. While the adage that the keeper should "at least be able to make the team as a field player" is true, "make the tam" and "play regularly" are very different things as things get more competitive.
Finally, I'm not sure I fully agree with the GK coach's reasoning on field playing time. I've always been told play in the field to develop footskills. Playing in the goal in game and game-like situations allows the keeper to best develop their sense of how plays develop and where dangerous shots and crosses come from, with the added advantage that they see it from the right perspective and get to learn from their successes or failures in reacting to that situation. While seeing the play develop from the other perspective (ie as the attacker) could be helpful, I don't think its an experience keepers necessarily need on a regular basis.
I agree with all of this. Also, if this is a travel team (which I assume it is since we’re even having this discussion), some clubs are really strict about kids who try out as GKs playing as GKs rather than splitting once they reach U13. If they aren’t, they end up with kids who have decent GK skills trying out as GKs when their real goal is to be a field player and they use GK as a way to back door onto a team they wouldn’t otherwise make. Holding a hard line on GKs playing as GKs reduces the gamesmanship.
Which would be fine, if they'd said that to me when they approached me about moving him up to this team. We would have turned them down, and there would be no hard feelings. But we didn't engage in any gamemanship here.
If you made this deal, you should just move your child back down or ask if your child can get field time with one of the lower teams.