Anonymous wrote:This topic is about peer reputation scores at US News
“ This is a measure of how a school is regarded by administrators at peer institutions on a peer assessment survey. A school's peer assessment score is determined by surveying presidents, provosts and deans of admissions, or officials in equivalent positions, at institutions in the school's ranking category.
Each individual was asked to rate peer schools' undergraduate academic programs on a scale from 1 (marginal) to 5 (distinguished).”
It is about academic programs, not student selectivity!
Anonymous wrote:This topic is about peer reputation scores at US News
“ This is a measure of how a school is regarded by administrators at peer institutions on a peer assessment survey. A school's peer assessment score is determined by surveying presidents, provosts and deans of admissions, or officials in equivalent positions, at institutions in the school's ranking category.
Each individual was asked to rate peer schools' undergraduate academic programs on a scale from 1 (marginal) to 5 (distinguished).”
It is about academic programs, not student selectivity!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rearranged the rankings based on reputation scores, you're welcome:
4.9 Harvard MIT Stanford
4.8 Princeton Yale
4.7 Columbia JHU Berkeley
4.6 UChicago Penn Caltech Cornell
4.5 Duke Michigan
4.4 Northwestern Brown Dartmouth UCLA
4.3 Vanderbilt Carnegie Mellon UVA(!)
4.2 Wash U Emory Notre Dame Georgetown
4.1 Rice
The peer reviews are correct. In terms of academics prestige, which is basically what peer review measures, the above is the correct order. Academics don’t care about selectivity, they are looking at schools that have the best faculty, facilities, and prowess. That is why public schools like Berkeley and Michigan are held in such high esteem.
I agree but selectivity matters , at least a little, in terms of overall prestige. There's a reason Rice is ranked so high in the real ranking.
It really doesn’t matter to be honest. Most of the universities listed above are highly selective because they are small at the undergraduate level. That does not equate to academic prestige with these people. That’s why Wash U, Emory, ND, Rice, Vanderbilt, etc are not viewed as favorably as the those listed above them. Too many of you are conflated selectivity with academic strength.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rearranged the rankings based on reputation scores, you're welcome:
4.9 Harvard MIT Stanford
4.8 Princeton Yale
4.7 Columbia JHU Berkeley
4.6 UChicago Penn Caltech Cornell
4.5 Duke Michigan
4.4 Northwestern Brown Dartmouth UCLA
4.3 Vanderbilt Carnegie Mellon UVA(!)
4.2 Wash U Emory Notre Dame Georgetown
4.1 Rice
The peer reviews are correct. In terms of academics prestige, which is basically what peer review measures, the above is the correct order. Academics don’t care about selectivity, they are looking at schools that have the best faculty, facilities, and prowess. That is why public schools like Berkeley and Michigan are held in such high esteem.
I agree but selectivity matters , at least a little, in terms of overall prestige. There's a reason Rice is ranked so high in the real ranking.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:** I forgot Michigan
1.Harvard, Stanford
3.MIT, Princeton,
5. Yale, Columbia
7. U Chicago, Caltech, John's Hopkins, Upenn
11. Duke, Northwestern, Brown
14. Dartmouth,*UCB
16. Cornell, *UCLA, Vanderbilt
19. Rice, Carnegie Mellon, WashU, Emory, Notre Dame, Georgetown
25. Gatech, UNC, UVA, Michigan
29. UT Austin, Wisconsin-Madison
Switch Vandy and Berkeley, and move UCLA down 1. Both UCs have great academics but they aren't selective enough. Otherwise, I agree.
Okay, I kind of agree selectivity should matter.
1.Harvard, Stanford
3.MIT, Princeton,
5. Yale, Columbia
7. U Chicago, Caltech, John's Hopkins, Upenn
11. Duke, Northwestern, Brown
14. Dartmouth, Vanderbilt
16. Cornell, UCB
18. Rice, Carnegie Mellon, WashU, Emory, Notre Dame, Georgetown, UCLA
25. Gatech, UNC, UVA, Michigan
29. UT Austin, Wisconsin-Madison
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rearranged the rankings based on reputation scores, you're welcome:
4.9 Harvard MIT Stanford
4.8 Princeton Yale
4.7 Columbia JHU Berkeley
4.6 UChicago Penn Caltech Cornell
4.5 Duke Michigan
4.4 Northwestern Brown Dartmouth UCLA
4.3 Vanderbilt Carnegie Mellon UVA(!)
4.2 Wash U Emory Notre Dame Georgetown
4.1 Rice
The peer reviews are correct. In terms of academics prestige, which is basically what peer review measures, the above is the correct order. Academics don’t care about selectivity, they are looking at schools that have the best faculty, facilities, and prowess. That is why public schools like Berkeley and Michigan are held in such high esteem.
Anonymous wrote:Rearranged the rankings based on reputation scores, you're welcome:
4.9 Harvard MIT Stanford
4.8 Princeton Yale
4.7 Columbia JHU Berkeley
4.6 UChicago Penn Caltech Cornell
4.5 Duke Michigan
4.4 Northwestern Brown Dartmouth UCLA
4.3 Vanderbilt Carnegie Mellon UVA(!)
4.2 Wash U Emory Notre Dame Georgetown
4.1 Rice
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:** I forgot Michigan
1.Harvard, Stanford
3.MIT, Princeton,
5. Yale, Columbia
7. U Chicago, Caltech, John's Hopkins, Upenn
11. Duke, Northwestern, Brown
14. Dartmouth,*UCB
16. Cornell, *UCLA, Vanderbilt
19. Rice, Carnegie Mellon, WashU, Emory, Notre Dame, Georgetown
25. Gatech, UNC, UVA, Michigan
29. UT Austin, Wisconsin-Madison
Switch Vandy and Berkeley, and move UCLA down 1. Both UCs have great academics but they aren't selective enough. Otherwise, I agree.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:** I forgot Michigan
1.Harvard, Stanford
3.MIT, Princeton,
5. Yale, Columbia
7. U Chicago, Caltech, John's Hopkins, Upenn
11. Duke, Northwestern, Brown
14. Dartmouth,*UCB
16. Cornell, *UCLA, Vanderbilt
19. Rice, Carnegie Mellon, WashU, Emory, Notre Dame, Georgetown
25. Gatech, UNC, UVA, Michigan
29. UT Austin, Wisconsin-Madison
Johns Hopkins should not be that high... I'd put it alongside Dartmouth/UCB/Cornell/UCLA. Vanderbilt should also be one tier down.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:** I forgot Michigan
1.Harvard, Stanford
3.MIT, Princeton,
5. Yale, Columbia
7. U Chicago, Caltech, John's Hopkins, Upenn
11. Duke, Northwestern, Brown
14. Dartmouth,*UCB
16. Cornell, *UCLA, Vanderbilt
19. Rice, Carnegie Mellon, WashU, Emory, Notre Dame, Georgetown
25. Gatech, UNC, UVA, Michigan
29. UT Austin, Wisconsin-Madison
I don't understand why Princeton is so high. While it's excellent in the field that it has, it has a very limited number of fields.
You could say the same about MIT.
Anonymous wrote:** I forgot Michigan
1.Harvard, Stanford
3.MIT, Princeton,
5. Yale, Columbia
7. U Chicago, Caltech, John's Hopkins, Upenn
11. Duke, Northwestern, Brown
14. Dartmouth,*UCB
16. Cornell, *UCLA, Vanderbilt
19. Rice, Carnegie Mellon, WashU, Emory, Notre Dame, Georgetown
25. Gatech, UNC, UVA, Michigan
29. UT Austin, Wisconsin-Madison
Anonymous wrote:The definitive guide for the top 10 universities:
1. Harvard
2. Stanford
3. MIT
4. Yale
5. Princeton
6. Columbia
7. Penn
8. Caltech
9. Duke
10. JHU
11. Chicago
12. Northwestern
13. Brown
14. Dartmouth
15. Cornell
Anonymous wrote:** I forgot Michigan
1.Harvard, Stanford
3.MIT, Princeton,
5. Yale, Columbia
7. U Chicago, Caltech, John's Hopkins, Upenn
11. Duke, Northwestern, Brown
14. Dartmouth,*UCB
16. Cornell, *UCLA, Vanderbilt
19. Rice, Carnegie Mellon, WashU, Emory, Notre Dame, Georgetown
25. Gatech, UNC, UVA, Michigan
29. UT Austin, Wisconsin-Madison