Anonymous
12/13/2025 23:47
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One item seemingly glossed over here is reverting that section of townhomes back to Lewis that were going to WSHS in Scenario 4.
I’m not getting into whether scenario 4 made sense, the number of actual kids involved etc - but it’s not called out on the slides numbers etc from what I can tell.
They aren't "going back to Lewis"
They are remaining at their zoned school, which has been Lewis since tgey were built.
That’s exactly what I said. Under scenario four they were going to West Springfield. Remaining the same. Unchanged. Untouched. However, you want to phrase it. It’s a change from scenario four to scenario five that hasn’t been discussed.
You have it backwards.
Map 4 rezoned those neighborhoods.
May 5 leaves them untouched at Lewis.
Scenario 3 moved all of the Rolling Valley homes that are the split feeder to Key/Lewis to Saratoga/Key/Lewis. Scenario 4 moved one small section of that changed area back to Rolling Valley and had them continue on to Irving/West Springfield.
At the local meeting with Reid, it was indicated that scenario 3 was going to be the answer for the Rolling Valley split feeder, but no one knows for sure.
Approximately 300 homes is not a small section.
Anonymous
12/13/2025 23:02
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Was it released yet?
Anonymous
12/13/2025 22:37
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Anonymous wrote:You all seem fun.
+100
Can't believe this thread is still going... reading it is definitely a cure for insomnia.
Anonymous
12/13/2025 15:14
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One item seemingly glossed over here is reverting that section of townhomes back to Lewis that were going to WSHS in Scenario 4.
I’m not getting into whether scenario 4 made sense, the number of actual kids involved etc - but it’s not called out on the slides numbers etc from what I can tell.
They aren't "going back to Lewis"
They are remaining at their zoned school, which has been Lewis since tgey were built.
That’s exactly what I said. Under scenario four they were going to West Springfield. Remaining the same. Unchanged. Untouched. However, you want to phrase it. It’s a change from scenario four to scenario five that hasn’t been discussed.
You have it backwards.
Map 4 rezoned those neighborhoods.
May 5 leaves them untouched at Lewis.
Scenario 3 moved all of the Rolling Valley homes that are the split feeder to Key/Lewis to Saratoga/Key/Lewis. Scenario 4 moved one small section of that changed area back to Rolling Valley and had them continue on to Irving/West Springfield.
At the local meeting with Reid, it was indicated that scenario 3 was going to be the answer for the Rolling Valley split feeder, but no one knows for sure.
Anonymous
12/13/2025 14:16
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
So maybe next week we will see revised version? Or not to Jan?
Anonymous
12/12/2025 18:38
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Finally the last BRAC meeting
Anonymous
12/12/2025 18:03
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Anonymous wrote:When is Scenario 5 coming out?
Unclear but the final BRAC meeting is today. Probably next Friday after everyone leaves for the holidays.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 17:45
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
When is Scenario 5 coming out?
Anonymous
12/12/2025 16:14
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Ok - what do you choose to go by? What is your guess on that neighborhood now?
Scenario 4?
Scenario 5?
Something else?
My point is there was a change to something previously posted that hasn’t been mentioned directly - only indirectly via slides and it’s only noticeable if you know the area in question by the map itself.
Scenario 4?
Scenario 5?
Something else?
My point is there was a change to something previously posted that hasn’t been mentioned directly - only indirectly via slides and it’s only noticeable if you know the area in question by the map itself.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 16:02
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Anonymous wrote:Boundary tool still is on scenario 4 and the slides make no mention of it - however the absolutely fun folks on here posting about it want to phrase it.
Yes, they haven't updated the tool. So yeah, I guess if you'd prefer to believe that map, go for it.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 15:58
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Boundary tool still is on scenario 4 and the slides make no mention of it - however the absolutely fun folks on here posting about it want to phrase it.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 15:17
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Anonymous wrote:Where did they post any maps that showed that area? At the meeting about the changes that aren't actually happening?
Yes, you can see that portion of the map in the presentation they made this week. It shows the entire Lewis area and that bit was in it in the presentation.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 15:06
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Where did they post any maps that showed that area? At the meeting about the changes that aren't actually happening?
Anonymous
12/12/2025 15:03
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
You all seem fun.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 14:59
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One item seemingly glossed over here is reverting that section of townhomes back to Lewis that were going to WSHS in Scenario 4.
I’m not getting into whether scenario 4 made sense, the number of actual kids involved etc - but it’s not called out on the slides numbers etc from what I can tell.
They aren't "going back to Lewis"
They are remaining at their zoned school, which has been Lewis since tgey were built.
That’s exactly what I said. Under scenario four they were going to West Springfield. Remaining the same. Unchanged. Untouched. However, you want to phrase it. It’s a change from scenario four to scenario five that hasn’t been discussed.
You have it backwards.
Map 4 rezoned those neighborhoods.
May 5 leaves them untouched at Lewis.