Anonymous wrote:Garland has named special counsel
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/11/18/justice-trump-garland-special-counsel/
Anonymous wrote:Garland has named special counsel
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/11/18/justice-trump-garland-special-counsel/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why being a candidate protects him from anything.
Because Garland doesn't have the stones to charge him.
Garland isn’t responsible for charging Trump. That’s within the purview of the grand juries conducting the ongoing investigations. Garland’s responsibility is to put as much distance between himself and the grand jury as possible in order to blunt accusations of political motivation. The more career prosecutors working the cases the better.
You don't seem understand how grand juries work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why being a candidate protects him from anything.
Because Garland doesn't have the stones to charge him.
Garland isn’t responsible for charging Trump. That’s within the purview of the grand juries conducting the ongoing investigations. Garland’s responsibility is to put as much distance between himself and the grand jury as possible in order to blunt accusations of political motivation. The more career prosecutors working the cases the better.
You don't seem understand how grand juries work.
DP. PP explained it inartfully, but they have the gist of it correct. Garland will keep his distance for good policy reasons, and career DOJ will make the decisions on what, if anything, to take to a grand jury.
There is zero chance that the decision to seek an indictment is going to be made at the AUSA (i.e. career prosecutor) level. It will be approved by Garland himself. He personally approved the search warrant, which was far less consequential than an indictment would be.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why being a candidate protects him from anything.
Because Garland doesn't have the stones to charge him.
Garland isn’t responsible for charging Trump. That’s within the purview of the grand juries conducting the ongoing investigations. Garland’s responsibility is to put as much distance between himself and the grand jury as possible in order to blunt accusations of political motivation. The more career prosecutors working the cases the better.
You don't seem understand how grand juries work.
DP. PP explained it inartfully, but they have the gist of it correct. Garland will keep his distance for good policy reasons, and career DOJ will make the decisions on what, if anything, to take to a grand jury.
There is zero chance that the decision to seek an indictment is going to be made at the AUSA (i.e. career prosecutor) level. It will be approved by Garland himself. He personally approved the search warrant, which was far less consequential than an indictment would be.
Agreed. The only problem is that now Trump is a candidate, he will be able to accuse Biden of leaning on Garland even more so than before, and create and entire campaign of victim-hood around it. So Garland will be even more careful and cautious. Which means we might ever see an indictment!
Grr.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why being a candidate protects him from anything.
Because Garland doesn't have the stones to charge him.
Garland isn’t responsible for charging Trump. That’s within the purview of the grand juries conducting the ongoing investigations. Garland’s responsibility is to put as much distance between himself and the grand jury as possible in order to blunt accusations of political motivation. The more career prosecutors working the cases the better.
You don't seem understand how grand juries work.
DP. PP explained it inartfully, but they have the gist of it correct. Garland will keep his distance for good policy reasons, and career DOJ will make the decisions on what, if anything, to take to a grand jury.
There is zero chance that the decision to seek an indictment is going to be made at the AUSA (i.e. career prosecutor) level. It will be approved by Garland himself. He personally approved the search warrant, which was far less consequential than an indictment would be.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hey whatever happened with the nuclear launch codes that trump had Or the classified information he was going to sell to the Russians and Saudis? You people are utterly ridiculous.
That’s what the investigation is for. Have all of the classified documents that Trump and his people mishandled been accounted for yet? Where are they and who’s had access to them? National security is a priority for some of us.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why being a candidate protects him from anything.
Because Garland doesn't have the stones to charge him.
Garland isn’t responsible for charging Trump. That’s within the purview of the grand juries conducting the ongoing investigations. Garland’s responsibility is to put as much distance between himself and the grand jury as possible in order to blunt accusations of political motivation. The more career prosecutors working the cases the better.
You don't seem understand how grand juries work.
DP. PP explained it inartfully, but they have the gist of it correct. Garland will keep his distance for good policy reasons, and career DOJ will make the decisions on what, if anything, to take to a grand jury.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why being a candidate protects him from anything.
Because Garland doesn't have the stones to charge him.
Garland isn’t responsible for charging Trump. That’s within the purview of the grand juries conducting the ongoing investigations. Garland’s responsibility is to put as much distance between himself and the grand jury as possible in order to blunt accusations of political motivation. The more career prosecutors working the cases the better.
You don't seem understand how grand juries work.
DP. PP explained it inartfully, but they have the gist of it correct. Garland will keep his distance for good policy reasons, and career DOJ will make the decisions on what, if anything, to take to a grand jury.
Grand Juries will indict whoever they're asked to and no career DOJ attorney is pushing to indict a former president without approval from above
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why being a candidate protects him from anything.
Because Garland doesn't have the stones to charge him.
Garland isn’t responsible for charging Trump. That’s within the purview of the grand juries conducting the ongoing investigations. Garland’s responsibility is to put as much distance between himself and the grand jury as possible in order to blunt accusations of political motivation. The more career prosecutors working the cases the better.
You don't seem understand how grand juries work.
DP. PP explained it inartfully, but they have the gist of it correct. Garland will keep his distance for good policy reasons, and career DOJ will make the decisions on what, if anything, to take to a grand jury.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hey whatever happened with the nuclear launch codes that trump had Or the classified information he was going to sell to the Russians and Saudis? You people are utterly ridiculous.
Butteremails!
Remember when you cared about national security?
Dude...they never cared about national security.