Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hey whatever happened with the nuclear launch codes that trump had Or the classified information he was going to sell to the Russians and Saudis? You people are utterly ridiculous.
Butteremails!
Remember when you cared about national security?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why being a candidate protects him from anything.
Because Garland doesn't have the stones to charge him.
Garland isn’t responsible for charging Trump. That’s within the purview of the grand juries conducting the ongoing investigations. Garland’s responsibility is to put as much distance between himself and the grand jury as possible in order to blunt accusations of political motivation. The more career prosecutors working the cases the better.
You don't seem understand how grand juries work.
Anonymous wrote:Hey whatever happened with the nuclear launch codes that trump had Or the classified information he was going to sell to the Russians and Saudis? You people are utterly ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why being a candidate protects him from anything.
Because Garland doesn't have the stones to charge him.
Garland isn’t responsible for charging Trump. That’s within the purview of the grand juries conducting the ongoing investigations. Garland’s responsibility is to put as much distance between himself and the grand jury as possible in order to blunt accusations of political motivation. The more career prosecutors working the cases the better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why being a candidate protects him from anything.
Because Garland doesn't have the stones to charge him.
Anonymous wrote:Hey whatever happened with the nuclear launch codes that trump had Or the classified information he was going to sell to the Russians and Saudis? You people are utterly ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why being a candidate protects him from anything.
Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why being a candidate protects him from anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what does this mean? Nothing will happen?
Nothing was ever going to happen unless there was an attorney general with a spine.
So, it's over? Especially now that he intends to run again?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what does this mean? Nothing will happen?
Nothing was ever going to happen unless there was an attorney general with a spine.
Anonymous wrote:So what does this mean? Nothing will happen?
Anonymous wrote:How convenient for Trump!!
But why would Devlin's FBI sources leak this? WhT's their motivation?
Is it to clear the way for Trump to run?
It sounds phony to me. Weird story. "People" are Devlin's sources.