Anonymous
09/27/2024 14:41
Subject: Kamala Harris for President
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here's the latest polls that make a Madame President seem far more likely...
@MorningConsult
battleground tracking among LVs:
AZ: Harris 47%, Trump 49%
GA: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
MI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
NV: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
NC: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
PA: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
WI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
These are not great at all.
Why not? If she wins PA, her path to 270 i pretty easy.
PA is one of the biggest Trump states in the NE so don’t count on it. Biden only won by 1.4% and that’s his home state. PA is Pennsyltucky after all.
Western PA and Ohio are all Trump
Land.
She has more of a shot in Georgia than PA.
You are believing your rural Pennsyltuckey friends and family far too much. With the exception of 2016, when Trump scored PA because the Clinton campaign manager screwed up, PA has not voted for a Republican for president since Bush in 1988--36 years. Trump scored a coup when the Clinton campaign essentially relied on Pennsylvania voting reliably blue and did not defend it. Trump's went and campaigned in rural PA and some of the smaller cities and managed to get just enough votes (barely 0.5%) to win the state. Note that Biden's campaign was wise to pay attention in 2020 and they won the state by 2.2%. Harris' campaign will do that again.
The Philadelphia metropolitan area has 50% of the state voters and is reliably blue. Pittsburgh metropolitan area is blue in the most populous county, Allegheny county. The area is 20% of the state population and tends to vote about 75% Democratic, mostly in Allegheny county, the other counties tend to lean slightly red. Scranton, Allentown, Harrisburg, State College and Eric all lean blue.
So the areas that you cite as Trump county add up to barely 1/3 of the state voter population.
Trump has a very weak chance of taking Pennsylvania again as long as Harris and her surrogates campaign there, which they have been doing regularly throughout the campaign. It would be very unlikely that Trump takes PA.
+1 And Harris is not ignoring rural Pennsylvania voters.
Rural Pennsylvania voters will not vote for this left-wing California socialist.
Saying that she wants to eliminate the filibuster will not help win over swing voters.
It will when you finish the sentence, which is the fact that she will get back the rights for women that the GOP gleefully stripped from us.
What right?
The right to have full autonomy to control one's own body, health and medical treatment.
Does that apply to the covid vaccine as well?
Unless you work for the federal government, no one forced you to get vaccinated.
Plenty of employers required the covid vaccine at one point. In fact, the Harris/Walz campaign requires it as a condition of employment right now: "Harris for President requires all employees to be "up to date" on COVID-19 vaccination status as prescribed by the CDC as a condition of employment, unless otherwise prohibited by applicable law."
Is full autonomy over one's body only relevant in certain cases?
Anonymous
09/27/2024 14:40
Subject: Kamala Harris for President
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here's the latest polls that make a Madame President seem far more likely...
@MorningConsult
battleground tracking among LVs:
AZ: Harris 47%, Trump 49%
GA: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
MI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
NV: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
NC: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
PA: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
WI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
These are not great at all.
Why not? If she wins PA, her path to 270 i pretty easy.
PA is one of the biggest Trump states in the NE so don’t count on it. Biden only won by 1.4% and that’s his home state. PA is Pennsyltucky after all.
Western PA and Ohio are all Trump
Land.
She has more of a shot in Georgia than PA.
You are believing your rural Pennsyltuckey friends and family far too much. With the exception of 2016, when Trump scored PA because the Clinton campaign manager screwed up, PA has not voted for a Republican for president since Bush in 1988--36 years. Trump scored a coup when the Clinton campaign essentially relied on Pennsylvania voting reliably blue and did not defend it. Trump's went and campaigned in rural PA and some of the smaller cities and managed to get just enough votes (barely 0.5%) to win the state. Note that Biden's campaign was wise to pay attention in 2020 and they won the state by 2.2%. Harris' campaign will do that again.
The Philadelphia metropolitan area has 50% of the state voters and is reliably blue. Pittsburgh metropolitan area is blue in the most populous county, Allegheny county. The area is 20% of the state population and tends to vote about 75% Democratic, mostly in Allegheny county, the other counties tend to lean slightly red. Scranton, Allentown, Harrisburg, State College and Eric all lean blue.
So the areas that you cite as Trump county add up to barely 1/3 of the state voter population.
Trump has a very weak chance of taking Pennsylvania again as long as Harris and her surrogates campaign there, which they have been doing regularly throughout the campaign. It would be very unlikely that Trump takes PA.
+1 And Harris is not ignoring rural Pennsylvania voters.
Rural Pennsylvania voters will not vote for this left-wing California socialist.
Saying that she wants to eliminate the filibuster will not help win over swing voters.
It will when you finish the sentence, which is the fact that she will get back the rights for women that the GOP gleefully stripped from us.
What right?
The right to have full autonomy to control one's own body, health and medical treatment.
Does that apply to the covid vaccine as well?
Unless you work for the federal government, no one forced you to get vaccinated.
Wrong.
All th health care worker and police/fire people. Got fired in NY if they did not take the vaccine .
Anonymous
09/27/2024 14:28
Subject: Kamala Harris for President
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Great to see Harris visit the border after only 3.5 years in office.
It’s only a photo op. She does not care one bit about the border and illegal immigration’s. It only reached her radar as it’s an issue she is losing on. And don’t even try to blame republicans for the “ Border Bill” from 2024. That was only put up when Democrats could not hide the millions of migrants already here like in NY, Chicago.
In 2023, Myorkas of the Admin would not even say there was a crisis at the border and the border was secure! In 2023 Republicans in the house passed HR2 to deal with illegal immigration. A full year before Dems even cared.
So I call BS on anything getting done o note border if Harris elected. Maybe she will keep working on the roots causes????
The country is losing on it because the OP is not a serious negotiation partner nor serious about fixing the problem.
*GOP
Anonymous
09/27/2024 14:27
Subject: Kamala Harris for President
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here's the latest polls that make a Madame President seem far more likely...
@MorningConsult
battleground tracking among LVs:
AZ: Harris 47%, Trump 49%
GA: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
MI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
NV: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
NC: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
PA: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
WI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
These are not great at all.
Why not? If she wins PA, her path to 270 i pretty easy.
PA is one of the biggest Trump states in the NE so don’t count on it. Biden only won by 1.4% and that’s his home state. PA is Pennsyltucky after all.
Western PA and Ohio are all Trump
Land.
She has more of a shot in Georgia than PA.
You are believing your rural Pennsyltuckey friends and family far too much. With the exception of 2016, when Trump scored PA because the Clinton campaign manager screwed up, PA has not voted for a Republican for president since Bush in 1988--36 years. Trump scored a coup when the Clinton campaign essentially relied on Pennsylvania voting reliably blue and did not defend it. Trump's went and campaigned in rural PA and some of the smaller cities and managed to get just enough votes (barely 0.5%) to win the state. Note that Biden's campaign was wise to pay attention in 2020 and they won the state by 2.2%. Harris' campaign will do that again.
The Philadelphia metropolitan area has 50% of the state voters and is reliably blue. Pittsburgh metropolitan area is blue in the most populous county, Allegheny county. The area is 20% of the state population and tends to vote about 75% Democratic, mostly in Allegheny county, the other counties tend to lean slightly red. Scranton, Allentown, Harrisburg, State College and Eric all lean blue.
So the areas that you cite as Trump county add up to barely 1/3 of the state voter population.
Trump has a very weak chance of taking Pennsylvania again as long as Harris and her surrogates campaign there, which they have been doing regularly throughout the campaign. It would be very unlikely that Trump takes PA.
+1 And Harris is not ignoring rural Pennsylvania voters.
Rural Pennsylvania voters will not vote for this left-wing California socialist.
Saying that she wants to eliminate the filibuster will not help win over swing voters.
It will when you finish the sentence, which is the fact that she will get back the rights for women that the GOP gleefully stripped from us.
What right?
The right to have full autonomy to control one's own body, health and medical treatment.
Does that apply to the covid vaccine as well?
Unless you work for the federal government, no one forced you to get vaccinated.
Anonymous
09/27/2024 14:26
Subject: Kamala Harris for President
Anonymous wrote:Great to see Harris visit the border after only 3.5 years in office.
It’s only a photo op. She does not care one bit about the border and illegal immigration’s. It only reached her radar as it’s an issue she is losing on. And don’t even try to blame republicans for the “ Border Bill” from 2024. That was only put up when Democrats could not hide the millions of migrants already here like in NY, Chicago.
In 2023, Myorkas of the Admin would not even say there was a crisis at the border and the border was secure! In 2023 Republicans in the house passed HR2 to deal with illegal immigration. A full year before Dems even cared.
So I call BS on anything getting done o note border if Harris elected. Maybe she will keep working on the roots causes????
The country is losing on it because the OP is not a serious negotiation partner nor serious about fixing the problem.
Anonymous
09/27/2024 14:21
Subject: Kamala Harris for President
Anonymous wrote:Be careful what to you wish for!!!!!!!!!!
I keep hearing “tyranny of the minority”. The Filibuster is used to to keep the moderate majority from passing bills along a 51-49 party line vote. If something is good, you should be able to get both parties to vote for it and get to 60.
So everyone here who wants the filibuster gone, be careful. To use it as a problem to pass liberal legislation that YOU want passed. And you see it as a tool Republicans are using that you want gone!
However Democrats have used it tons of times as well. Most recently was against Trump and the border wall. Trump had the house and senate and wanted to move funding to complete the border wall. Democrats Stopped him using the filibuster. Without the filibuster, Trump would have his entire wall now and could do anything he wanted the years he had simple majorities of the house and senate.
https://apnews.com/united-states-congress-4089515ecc8b43198b2f3bb7062453f6
So if yo give up this power now, you will have no defense when yo use so the minority.
Ask Harry Reid how that turned out when he got rid of the 60 votes needed to confirm judges. The republicans when took over, confirmed a record number of judges along party lines. Democrats could do nothing to stop them.
Sure, 60 votes between the two parties should be possible when good legislation is in front of them. It certainly used to be. Anyone who has been paying attention for last few decades and especially in the Trump era has witnessed our two major political parties evolve into a dysfunctional mess with piss poor leadership. We need to somehow rid ourselves of the stubborn over 70 dinosaurs in Congress along with a few dozen of the wing nuts that make all the unnecessary noise and then combine that with elite leadership like a Clinton or Obama in The White House and then maybe, just maybe good legislation will regularly be passed. We are far, far from this solution at the current moment.
Anonymous
09/27/2024 13:48
Subject: Kamala Harris for President
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here's the latest polls that make a Madame President seem far more likely...
@MorningConsult
battleground tracking among LVs:
AZ: Harris 47%, Trump 49%
GA: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
MI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
NV: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
NC: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
PA: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
WI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
These are not great at all.
Why not? If she wins PA, her path to 270 i pretty easy.
PA is one of the biggest Trump states in the NE so don’t count on it. Biden only won by 1.4% and that’s his home state. PA is Pennsyltucky after all.
Western PA and Ohio are all Trump
Land.
She has more of a shot in Georgia than PA.
You are believing your rural Pennsyltuckey friends and family far too much. With the exception of 2016, when Trump scored PA because the Clinton campaign manager screwed up, PA has not voted for a Republican for president since Bush in 1988--36 years. Trump scored a coup when the Clinton campaign essentially relied on Pennsylvania voting reliably blue and did not defend it. Trump's went and campaigned in rural PA and some of the smaller cities and managed to get just enough votes (barely 0.5%) to win the state. Note that Biden's campaign was wise to pay attention in 2020 and they won the state by 2.2%. Harris' campaign will do that again.
The Philadelphia metropolitan area has 50% of the state voters and is reliably blue. Pittsburgh metropolitan area is blue in the most populous county, Allegheny county. The area is 20% of the state population and tends to vote about 75% Democratic, mostly in Allegheny county, the other counties tend to lean slightly red. Scranton, Allentown, Harrisburg, State College and Eric all lean blue.
So the areas that you cite as Trump county add up to barely 1/3 of the state voter population.
Trump has a very weak chance of taking Pennsylvania again as long as Harris and her surrogates campaign there, which they have been doing regularly throughout the campaign. It would be very unlikely that Trump takes PA.
+1 And Harris is not ignoring rural Pennsylvania voters.
Rural Pennsylvania voters will not vote for this left-wing California socialist.
Saying that she wants to eliminate the filibuster will not help win over swing voters.
It will when you finish the sentence, which is the fact that she will get back the rights for women that the GOP gleefully stripped from us.
What right?
The right to have full autonomy to control one's own body, health and medical treatment.
Does that apply to the covid vaccine as well?
Anonymous
09/27/2024 13:15
Subject: Kamala Harris for President
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here's the latest polls that make a Madame President seem far more likely...
@MorningConsult
battleground tracking among LVs:
AZ: Harris 47%, Trump 49%
GA: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
MI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
NV: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
NC: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
PA: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
WI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
These are not great at all.
Why not? If she wins PA, her path to 270 i pretty easy.
PA is one of the biggest Trump states in the NE so don’t count on it. Biden only won by 1.4% and that’s his home state. PA is Pennsyltucky after all.
Western PA and Ohio are all Trump
Land.
She has more of a shot in Georgia than PA.
You are believing your rural Pennsyltuckey friends and family far too much. With the exception of 2016, when Trump scored PA because the Clinton campaign manager screwed up, PA has not voted for a Republican for president since Bush in 1988--36 years. Trump scored a coup when the Clinton campaign essentially relied on Pennsylvania voting reliably blue and did not defend it. Trump's went and campaigned in rural PA and some of the smaller cities and managed to get just enough votes (barely 0.5%) to win the state. Note that Biden's campaign was wise to pay attention in 2020 and they won the state by 2.2%. Harris' campaign will do that again.
The Philadelphia metropolitan area has 50% of the state voters and is reliably blue. Pittsburgh metropolitan area is blue in the most populous county, Allegheny county. The area is 20% of the state population and tends to vote about 75% Democratic, mostly in Allegheny county, the other counties tend to lean slightly red. Scranton, Allentown, Harrisburg, State College and Eric all lean blue.
So the areas that you cite as Trump county add up to barely 1/3 of the state voter population.
Trump has a very weak chance of taking Pennsylvania again as long as Harris and her surrogates campaign there, which they have been doing regularly throughout the campaign. It would be very unlikely that Trump takes PA.
+1 And Harris is not ignoring rural Pennsylvania voters.
Rural Pennsylvania voters will not vote for this left-wing California socialist.
Saying that she wants to eliminate the filibuster will not help win over swing voters.
It will when you finish the sentence, which is the fact that she will get back the rights for women that the GOP gleefully stripped from us.
What right?
The right to have full autonomy to control one's own body, health and medical treatment.
They have that. Plus the baby has that.
Anonymous
09/27/2024 13:13
Subject: Kamala Harris for President
I’m losing hope she’s going to win. I’ve basically accepted another Trump admin. Sorry to be a Debbie downer maybe it’s the weather but all the hype and hope we had a few weeks ago has basically fizzled and I miss don’t think she’s got the votes.
Anonymous
09/27/2024 12:58
Subject: Re:Kamala Harris for President
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
She has great grassroot support. Most of her fund came from small donors. She got so much that even a LPJ fundraising event was unnecessary.
https://www.opensecrets.org/2024-presidential-race/small-donors?curr=C&show=T
Meanwhile all of Trump’s money comes from billionaires and dark money.
And 100K small time donors have 100K votes. 50-100 billionaires still only have 50-100 votes.
Trump is losing in so many ways. But, as always, he will try to hide the fact that his support is melting away.
Anonymous
09/27/2024 12:40
Subject: Kamala Harris for President
Great to see Harris visit the border after only 3.5 years in office.
It’s only a photo op. She does not care one bit about the border and illegal immigration’s. It only reached her radar as it’s an issue she is losing on. And don’t even try to blame republicans for the “ Border Bill” from 2024. That was only put up when Democrats could not hide the millions of migrants already here like in NY, Chicago.
In 2023, Myorkas of the Admin would not even say there was a crisis at the border and the border was secure! In 2023 Republicans in the house passed HR2 to deal with illegal immigration. A full year before Dems even cared.
So I call BS on anything getting done o note border if Harris elected. Maybe she will keep working on the roots causes????
It’s only a photo op. She does not care one bit about the border and illegal immigration’s. It only reached her radar as it’s an issue she is losing on. And don’t even try to blame republicans for the “ Border Bill” from 2024. That was only put up when Democrats could not hide the millions of migrants already here like in NY, Chicago.
In 2023, Myorkas of the Admin would not even say there was a crisis at the border and the border was secure! In 2023 Republicans in the house passed HR2 to deal with illegal immigration. A full year before Dems even cared.
So I call BS on anything getting done o note border if Harris elected. Maybe she will keep working on the roots causes????
Anonymous
09/27/2024 11:46
Subject: Re:Kamala Harris for President
Anonymous wrote:
She has great grassroot support. Most of her fund came from small donors. She got so much that even a LPJ fundraising event was unnecessary.
https://www.opensecrets.org/2024-presidential-race/small-donors?curr=C&show=T
Meanwhile all of Trump’s money comes from billionaires and dark money.
Anonymous
09/27/2024 11:46
Subject: Kamala Harris for President
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here's the latest polls that make a Madame President seem far more likely...
@MorningConsult
battleground tracking among LVs:
AZ: Harris 47%, Trump 49%
GA: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
MI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
NV: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
NC: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
PA: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
WI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
These are not great at all.
Why not? If she wins PA, her path to 270 i pretty easy.
PA is one of the biggest Trump states in the NE so don’t count on it. Biden only won by 1.4% and that’s his home state. PA is Pennsyltucky after all.
Western PA and Ohio are all Trump
Land.
She has more of a shot in Georgia than PA.
You are believing your rural Pennsyltuckey friends and family far too much. With the exception of 2016, when Trump scored PA because the Clinton campaign manager screwed up, PA has not voted for a Republican for president since Bush in 1988--36 years. Trump scored a coup when the Clinton campaign essentially relied on Pennsylvania voting reliably blue and did not defend it. Trump's went and campaigned in rural PA and some of the smaller cities and managed to get just enough votes (barely 0.5%) to win the state. Note that Biden's campaign was wise to pay attention in 2020 and they won the state by 2.2%. Harris' campaign will do that again.
The Philadelphia metropolitan area has 50% of the state voters and is reliably blue. Pittsburgh metropolitan area is blue in the most populous county, Allegheny county. The area is 20% of the state population and tends to vote about 75% Democratic, mostly in Allegheny county, the other counties tend to lean slightly red. Scranton, Allentown, Harrisburg, State College and Eric all lean blue.
So the areas that you cite as Trump county add up to barely 1/3 of the state voter population.
Trump has a very weak chance of taking Pennsylvania again as long as Harris and her surrogates campaign there, which they have been doing regularly throughout the campaign. It would be very unlikely that Trump takes PA.
+1 And Harris is not ignoring rural Pennsylvania voters.
Rural Pennsylvania voters will not vote for this left-wing California socialist.
Saying that she wants to eliminate the filibuster will not help win over swing voters.
It will when you finish the sentence, which is the fact that she will get back the rights for women that the GOP gleefully stripped from us.
What right?
The right to have full autonomy to control one's own body, health and medical treatment.
I fully expect a brain dead retort from that pp about killing babeez. They haven’t cared a whit about all the women bleeding out and killed because of these unAmerican policies because their raison d’etre is “punish women.”
Anonymous
09/27/2024 10:00
Subject: Kamala Harris for President
Be careful what to you wish for!!!!!!!!!!
I keep hearing “tyranny of the minority”. The Filibuster is used to to keep the moderate majority from passing bills along a 51-49 party line vote. If something is good, you should be able to get both parties to vote for it and get to 60.
So everyone here who wants the filibuster gone, be careful. To use it as a problem to pass liberal legislation that YOU want passed. And you see it as a tool Republicans are using that you want gone!
However Democrats have used it tons of times as well. Most recently was against Trump and the border wall. Trump had the house and senate and wanted to move funding to complete the border wall. Democrats Stopped him using the filibuster. Without the filibuster, Trump would have his entire wall now and could do anything he wanted the years he had simple majorities of the house and senate.
https://apnews.com/united-states-congress-4089515ecc8b43198b2f3bb7062453f6
So if yo give up this power now, you will have no defense when yo use so the minority.
Ask Harry Reid how that turned out when he got rid of the 60 votes needed to confirm judges. The republicans when took over, confirmed a record number of judges along party lines. Democrats could do nothing to stop them.
I keep hearing “tyranny of the minority”. The Filibuster is used to to keep the moderate majority from passing bills along a 51-49 party line vote. If something is good, you should be able to get both parties to vote for it and get to 60.
So everyone here who wants the filibuster gone, be careful. To use it as a problem to pass liberal legislation that YOU want passed. And you see it as a tool Republicans are using that you want gone!
However Democrats have used it tons of times as well. Most recently was against Trump and the border wall. Trump had the house and senate and wanted to move funding to complete the border wall. Democrats Stopped him using the filibuster. Without the filibuster, Trump would have his entire wall now and could do anything he wanted the years he had simple majorities of the house and senate.
https://apnews.com/united-states-congress-4089515ecc8b43198b2f3bb7062453f6
So if yo give up this power now, you will have no defense when yo use so the minority.
Ask Harry Reid how that turned out when he got rid of the 60 votes needed to confirm judges. The republicans when took over, confirmed a record number of judges along party lines. Democrats could do nothing to stop them.
Anonymous
09/27/2024 09:43
Subject: Kamala Harris for President
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here's the latest polls that make a Madame President seem far more likely...
@MorningConsult
battleground tracking among LVs:
AZ: Harris 47%, Trump 49%
GA: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
MI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
NV: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
NC: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
PA: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
WI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
These are not great at all.
Why not? If she wins PA, her path to 270 i pretty easy.
PA is one of the biggest Trump states in the NE so don’t count on it. Biden only won by 1.4% and that’s his home state. PA is Pennsyltucky after all.
Western PA and Ohio are all Trump
Land.
She has more of a shot in Georgia than PA.
You are believing your rural Pennsyltuckey friends and family far too much. With the exception of 2016, when Trump scored PA because the Clinton campaign manager screwed up, PA has not voted for a Republican for president since Bush in 1988--36 years. Trump scored a coup when the Clinton campaign essentially relied on Pennsylvania voting reliably blue and did not defend it. Trump's went and campaigned in rural PA and some of the smaller cities and managed to get just enough votes (barely 0.5%) to win the state. Note that Biden's campaign was wise to pay attention in 2020 and they won the state by 2.2%. Harris' campaign will do that again.
The Philadelphia metropolitan area has 50% of the state voters and is reliably blue. Pittsburgh metropolitan area is blue in the most populous county, Allegheny county. The area is 20% of the state population and tends to vote about 75% Democratic, mostly in Allegheny county, the other counties tend to lean slightly red. Scranton, Allentown, Harrisburg, State College and Eric all lean blue.
So the areas that you cite as Trump county add up to barely 1/3 of the state voter population.
Trump has a very weak chance of taking Pennsylvania again as long as Harris and her surrogates campaign there, which they have been doing regularly throughout the campaign. It would be very unlikely that Trump takes PA.
+1 And Harris is not ignoring rural Pennsylvania voters.
Rural Pennsylvania voters will not vote for this left-wing California socialist.
Saying that she wants to eliminate the filibuster will not help win over swing voters.
It will when you finish the sentence, which is the fact that she will get back the rights for women that the GOP gleefully stripped from us.
What right?
The right to have full autonomy to control one's own body, health and medical treatment.