Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NYT citing MN fire dept report

She had two apparent gunshot wounds on the right side of her chest, another on her left forearm and a possible fourth on the left side of her head.

So she wasn’t shot in the face as all the armchair experts here proclaimed.

Why you acting like this is good for the shooter? It means the fatal shot was last, on the side of her head, and least justifiable. Not to mention she was alive afterward and was refused treatment.

It’s horrible for the shooter and victim both. Just shows that we at home actually have no idea what is really happening and all the rushing to judgment and panicking is counterproductive. My opinion

We do know that he murdered her in the street. It’s right there on video from multiple angles.

Self defense when wife shouted “Drive, drive” while suv was pointed at agent.

This part is now PROVEN false given that Ross's own video clearly shows her turning the steering wheel AWAY from him, along with the NY Times millisecond-level analysis of synchronized videos from multiple angles showing he was clear of the vehicle when he fired the first shot.

Your OPINIONS are irrelevant given what's now clearly established by video evidence as FACT. You can "disagree" all you like but you will still be wrong. Start getting it through your head that FACTS outweigh OPINIONS. Opinions that contradict fact are irrelevant and worthless outside of MAGA land.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/16/ice-minneapolis-arrests-judge-protests-00735416

A federal judge found that ICE had repeatedly retaliated against peaceful protesters in unconstitutional ways — and barred agents involved in Minnesota's "Operation Metro Surge" from using similar tactics and force.

“ BREAKING: Federal judge severely limits what ICE can do in Minnesota effective immediately. In a nutshell...no tackling, spraying, dragging, shooting, bombing, beating, or even interacting with anyone they don't have a warrant or reasonable suspicion for. Failure to adhere will be considered contempt. The judge especially stated no arresting people who are filming at a safe distance, no pulling people from cars who aren't interacting with ICE, and no menacing peaceful protesters either.”

When is the last time this administration listened to a judge?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NYT citing MN fire dept report

She had two apparent gunshot wounds on the right side of her chest, another on her left forearm and a possible fourth on the left side of her head.

So she wasn’t shot in the face as all the armchair experts here proclaimed.

Why you acting like this is good for the shooter? It means the fatal shot was last, on the side of her head, and least justifiable. Not to mention she was alive afterward and was refused treatment.

It’s horrible for the shooter and victim both. Just shows that we at home actually have no idea what is really happening and all the rushing to judgment and panicking is counterproductive. My opinion

Wut?

Idiotic take. ICE murdered her in cold blood, that’s plain as day. We at home know that, even if we don’t know the precise trajectories of the bullets that killed her.

Disagree

You can be pen pals when he goes to jail.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NYT citing MN fire dept report

She had two apparent gunshot wounds on the right side of her chest, another on her left forearm and a possible fourth on the left side of her head.

So she wasn’t shot in the face as all the armchair experts here proclaimed.

Why you acting like this is good for the shooter? It means the fatal shot was last, on the side of her head, and least justifiable. Not to mention she was alive afterward and was refused treatment.

It’s horrible for the shooter and victim both. Just shows that we at home actually have no idea what is really happening and all the rushing to judgment and panicking is counterproductive. My opinion

Wut?

Idiotic take. ICE murdered her in cold blood, that’s plain as day. We at home know that, even if we don’t know the precise trajectories of the bullets that killed her.

Disagree

You probably also disagree that grocery prices are up, because Fox news tells you they are down.

Agents were shouting ‘move move’ as well- she was complying.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NYT citing MN fire dept report

She had two apparent gunshot wounds on the right side of her chest, another on her left forearm and a possible fourth on the left side of her head.

So she wasn’t shot in the face as all the armchair experts here proclaimed.

Why you acting like this is good for the shooter? It means the fatal shot was last, on the side of her head, and least justifiable. Not to mention she was alive afterward and was refused treatment.

It’s horrible for the shooter and victim both. Just shows that we at home actually have no idea what is really happening and all the rushing to judgment and panicking is counterproductive. My opinion

We do know that he murdered her in the street. It’s right there on video from multiple angles.

Self defense when wife shouted “Drive, drive” while suv was pointed at agent.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NYT citing MN fire dept report

She had two apparent gunshot wounds on the right side of her chest, another on her left forearm and a possible fourth on the left side of her head.

So she wasn’t shot in the face as all the armchair experts here proclaimed.

Why you acting like this is good for the shooter? It means the fatal shot was last, on the side of her head, and least justifiable. Not to mention she was alive afterward and was refused treatment.

It’s horrible for the shooter and victim both. Just shows that we at home actually have no idea what is really happening and all the rushing to judgment and panicking is counterproductive. My opinion

Wut?

Idiotic take. ICE murdered her in cold blood, that’s plain as day. We at home know that, even if we don’t know the precise trajectories of the bullets that killed her.

Disagree

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/16/ice-minneapolis-arrests-judge-protests-00735416

A federal judge found that ICE had repeatedly retaliated against peaceful protesters in unconstitutional ways — and barred agents involved in Minnesota's "Operation Metro Surge" from using similar tactics and force.

“ BREAKING: Federal judge severely limits what ICE can do in Minnesota effective immediately. In a nutshell...no tackling, spraying, dragging, shooting, bombing, beating, or even interacting with anyone they don't have a warrant or reasonable suspicion for. Failure to adhere will be considered contempt. The judge especially stated no arresting people who are filming at a safe distance, no pulling people from cars who aren't interacting with ICE, and no menacing peaceful protesters either.”

Are they still allowed to shoot peaceful demonstrators in the face from 5 feet away? Because that's what any normal person's first instinct is to do.

Oh, I’m sure that they will still lie about everything, but it’s all getting recorded. There are international journalists now there recording the ICE crimes. It’s looks like Russia and the FSB.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/16/ice-minneapolis-arrests-judge-protests-00735416

A federal judge found that ICE had repeatedly retaliated against peaceful protesters in unconstitutional ways — and barred agents involved in Minnesota's "Operation Metro Surge" from using similar tactics and force.

“ BREAKING: Federal judge severely limits what ICE can do in Minnesota effective immediately. In a nutshell...no tackling, spraying, dragging, shooting, bombing, beating, or even interacting with anyone they don't have a warrant or reasonable suspicion for. Failure to adhere will be considered contempt. The judge especially stated no arresting people who are filming at a safe distance, no pulling people from cars who aren't interacting with ICE, and no menacing peaceful protesters either.”

Are they still allowed to shoot peaceful demonstrators in the face from 5 feet away? Because that's what any normal person's first instinct is to do.

Not sure how the judges will enforce this, but at least it is something.

Anonymous wrote:https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/16/ice-minneapolis-arrests-judge-protests-00735416

A federal judge found that ICE had repeatedly retaliated against peaceful protesters in unconstitutional ways — and barred agents involved in Minnesota's "Operation Metro Surge" from using similar tactics and force.

“ BREAKING: Federal judge severely limits what ICE can do in Minnesota effective immediately. In a nutshell...no tackling, spraying, dragging, shooting, bombing, beating, or even interacting with anyone they don't have a warrant or reasonable suspicion for. Failure to adhere will be considered contempt. The judge especially stated no arresting people who are filming at a safe distance, no pulling people from cars who aren't interacting with ICE, and no menacing peaceful protesters either.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just to be clear, instead of "she never hit him" we are now at "she didn’t hit him that hard".

No, we still say she didn’t hit him.

CBS News …

The ICE agent who fatally shot Renee Good on Jan. 7 in Minneapolis, Jonathan Ross, suffered internal bleeding to the torso following the incident, according to two U.S. officials briefed on his medical condition.

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/16/ice-minneapolis-arrests-judge-protests-00735416

A federal judge found that ICE had repeatedly retaliated against peaceful protesters in unconstitutional ways — and barred agents involved in Minnesota's "Operation Metro Surge" from using similar tactics and force.