Anonymous
05/26/2024 19:47
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Or you can just make sure doctors are better educated about the rape exception. States like Mississippi are not going to go back to abortion legal until 40 weeks for the simple reason that their constituents don’t support that.
Or we could have a blue tsunami and overwhelm the women hating freaks and allow medical bodies to police abortion the same way they regulate every other medical procedure.
Anonymous
05/26/2024 19:27
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
It’s not about protecting children. It’s about controlling women:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/alabama-war-women-130000003.html
Alabamas approach could go national is the SC goes for fetal personhood. Not sure they have 5 votes for that yet.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/alabama-war-women-130000003.html
Alabamas approach could go national is the SC goes for fetal personhood. Not sure they have 5 votes for that yet.
Anonymous
05/26/2024 19:22
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Or you can just make sure doctors are better educated about the rape exception. States like Mississippi are not going to go back to abortion legal until 40 weeks for the simple reason that their constituents don’t support that.
Anonymous
05/26/2024 19:17
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Rape exceptions are a lie. From the article:
But amid confusion over what abortion care is allowed in Mississippi, Regina says she was unaware Ashley qualified for an abortion in Mississippi under the law's exception for cases of rape. Yet, even if she was aware, it's unlikely Ashley would have been able to get an abortion in Mississippi; with heavy restrictions in effect and the high penalties on physicians who violate the abortion ban, it is unlikely she would have found a doctor willing to perform a procedure.
Just let women have abortions!
"Exceptions" are there to give cover for lawmakers, not help rape victims. This is heartbreaking. We need to keep these stories in the spotlight. Let's women and doctors decide.
Anonymous
05/26/2024 17:47
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Rape exceptions are a lie. From the article:
But amid confusion over what abortion care is allowed in Mississippi, Regina says she was unaware Ashley qualified for an abortion in Mississippi under the law's exception for cases of rape. Yet, even if she was aware, it's unlikely Ashley would have been able to get an abortion in Mississippi; with heavy restrictions in effect and the high penalties on physicians who violate the abortion ban, it is unlikely she would have found a doctor willing to perform a procedure.
Just let women have abortions!
Anonymous
05/26/2024 16:18
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another 13-year old forced to have her rapists baby. Brought to you by Donald Trump.
https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/13-year-rape-victim-baby-amid-confusion-states/story?id=108351812
Article says she was eligible for an abortion in the state of MI by law. Doctor gave them bad information and should be sued.
So now doctors are expected to dispense legal advice?
Anonymous
05/26/2024 15:23
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Another 13-year old forced to have her rapists baby. Brought to you by Donald Trump.
https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/13-year-rape-victim-baby-amid-confusion-states/story?id=108351812
This is why we need to vote for the well-meaning elderly man.
Anonymous
05/26/2024 15:12
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Another 13-year old forced to have her rapists baby. Brought to you by Donald Trump.
https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/13-year-rape-victim-baby-amid-confusion-states/story?id=108351812
The GOP is so sick and twisted now.
Anonymous
05/26/2024 12:44
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Rape exceptions are a lie. From the article:
But amid confusion over what abortion care is allowed in Mississippi, Regina says she was unaware Ashley qualified for an abortion in Mississippi under the law's exception for cases of rape. Yet, even if she was aware, it's unlikely Ashley would have been able to get an abortion in Mississippi; with heavy restrictions in effect and the high penalties on physicians who violate the abortion ban, it is unlikely she would have found a doctor willing to perform a procedure.
Just let women have abortions!
But amid confusion over what abortion care is allowed in Mississippi, Regina says she was unaware Ashley qualified for an abortion in Mississippi under the law's exception for cases of rape. Yet, even if she was aware, it's unlikely Ashley would have been able to get an abortion in Mississippi; with heavy restrictions in effect and the high penalties on physicians who violate the abortion ban, it is unlikely she would have found a doctor willing to perform a procedure.
Just let women have abortions!
Anonymous
05/26/2024 12:41
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Another 13-year old forced to have her rapists baby. Brought to you by Donald Trump.
https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/13-year-rape-victim-baby-amid-confusion-states/story?id=108351812
Article says she was eligible for an abortion in the state of MI by law. Doctor gave them bad information and should be sued.
Anonymous
05/26/2024 12:33
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Another 13-year old forced to have her rapists baby. Brought to you by Donald Trump.
https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/13-year-rape-victim-baby-amid-confusion-states/story?id=108351812
Republicans are twisted sickos.
Anonymous
05/26/2024 12:28
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Another 13-year old forced to have her rapists baby. Brought to you by Donald Trump.
https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/13-year-rape-victim-baby-amid-confusion-states/story?id=108351812
https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/13-year-rape-victim-baby-amid-confusion-states/story?id=108351812
Anonymous
05/22/2024 14:21
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous
05/22/2024 10:50
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
It’s all there for us to see. The republicans want to ban birth control. It’s part of their party platform and we will see more and more them supporting a ban on weird grounds and setting the terms of the debate.
Like here. We don’t need to debate the logic of this assertion. We need to keep our eyes on the ball and not countenance a ban for any reason. Because there is no reason whatsoever to ban birth control.
Unless you want to control women.
Anonymous
05/21/2024 17:28
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
It’s all there for us to see. The republicans want to ban birth control. It’s part of their party platform and we will see more and more them supporting a ban on weird grounds and setting the terms of the debate.
Like here. We don’t need to debate the logic of this assertion. We need to keep our eyes on the ball and not countenance a ban for any reason. Because there is no reason whatsoever to ban birth control.
Ooh but they’ve got the religious weasels into a happy twist with this one! Finally, the Christian nationalist nation they’ve always wanted is in their grasp, if only Bibi keeps it up in Israel and if the media keeps riding for Trump!