Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This group was perfectly happy to give away a public building to an elite private school serving non-DC students for pennies on the dollar in order to prevent it from being put into public use. A proposal for a public school nearby is made and all of a sudden all these concerns about parking and traffic become all important. Basic logic dictates that if you really care about parking and traffic, the last thing you want in your neighborhood is an elite private school serving non-DC students. But of course this has nothing to do with that but rather horrible prejudices apparently harbored by this group.
I don't think vilifying the Lab school is appropriate. Lots of DC kids go to Lab and DC pays for poor kids to go private day schools like this. The student population there is a mix of self pay and kids paid for by school districts (DC, VA and MD). No one wants to send their kid to a special education private school-its a school of last resort. Its not "elite".
Anonymous wrote:I walked by there a few days ago. The location is pretty bad. There is no space for anything outside beside a tiny playground and a half basketball court..
School seems in good condition otherwise.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone have any updates or predictions on what DCPS is going to do with the new MacArthur campus? Can’t believe they’re just letting it sit there and crumble…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FCCA Pravda weighs in again on the "whodunit" vexing the neighborhood: https://potomactimes.wordpress.com/2021/10/26/mpd-no-info-to-suggest-cops-clipped-hardy-protest-signs/
omg. they all need to get a hobby!!!
Anonymous wrote:FCCA Pravda weighs in again on the "whodunit" vexing the neighborhood: https://potomactimes.wordpress.com/2021/10/26/mpd-no-info-to-suggest-cops-clipped-hardy-protest-signs/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just don't get it all. After their signs are removed from the fence, the anti-school contingent puts up a blank "Free Speech" sign, presumably to invite the opinions of the community. Someone writes a message on that sign that points to the fact that the FCCA doesn't represent the community as the FCCA is not elected by the community. Someone affiliated with or supportive of the FCCA then erases that message and replaces it with another accusing that person of being a "coward" and asking them to "identify" themselves. Is this behavior par for the course in DC neighborhoods or is there something at the water in Foxhall?
As has been pointed out quite a few times on this thread, Foxhall and the FCCA are not the same thing. I know many lovely people who live in Foxhall Village. The FCCA is a tiny, insular, bitter organization dedicated to preserving its perceived power.
I went through the ANC3D website. the schools were never an adgenda item until June 2021--the ANC poeple had already made up their minds to say "they enthusiastically" endorsed the two schools. They never thalked to their constituents .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just don't get it all. After their signs are removed from the fence, the anti-school contingent puts up a blank "Free Speech" sign, presumably to invite the opinions of the community. Someone writes a message on that sign that points to the fact that the FCCA doesn't represent the community as the FCCA is not elected by the community. Someone affiliated with or supportive of the FCCA then erases that message and replaces it with another accusing that person of being a "coward" and asking them to "identify" themselves. Is this behavior par for the course in DC neighborhoods or is there something at the water in Foxhall?
As has been pointed out quite a few times on this thread, Foxhall and the FCCA are not the same thing. I know many lovely people who live in Foxhall Village. The FCCA is a tiny, insular, bitter organization dedicated to preserving its perceived power.
Anonymous wrote:FCCA Pravda weighs in again on the "whodunit" vexing the neighborhood: https://potomactimes.wordpress.com/2021/10/26/mpd-no-info-to-suggest-cops-clipped-hardy-protest-signs/