Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Floyd was a walking time bomb health wise.
Multiple experts testified that there was no evidence to support the idea that he would have died that day were it not for the man who sat on his neck for 9 minutes.
Yes, he was unhealthy. He should've have been put in the recovery position as soon as was possible. He should've been given aid as soon as was the officers saw that he was in distress.
There is no evidence to suggest that he died suddenly (heart attack or stroke) or that he OD'd which would have been a slow and peaceful fading away. What everyone who saw that video witnessed was a man suffocating to death.
I can't agree with you that an OD is a peaceful death.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know if there are toxicology reports for Chauvin? Was he high on drugs at the time he killed Floyd?
Yes. The Medical Examiner stated that there was enough fentanyl to have killed him. That if he had been found dead at home, there were enough drugs in his system that they would have been ruled the cause of death.
at trial they stated this, in testimony?
btw, police officers are supposed to help people od’ing, not kneeel on their necks. also someone who took enough opiates to OD is immobile, not walking around. oh, coincidentally somehow he took the fentanyl at exactly the right time to kill him and render him immobile, just when Chauvin was kneeling on him. total coincidence!
That’s not what I said. The Medical Examiner didn’t say the fentanyl killed him. Just that he had a level high enough that if, for example, he had died in his home that day, fentanyl would have been ruled the likely cause. See the difference?
No, I don’t see the difference, only smoke you’re trying to cast. the cause of death was the knee on the neck.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know if there are toxicology reports for Chauvin? Was he high on drugs at the time he killed Floyd?
Yes. The Medical Examiner stated that there was enough fentanyl to have killed him. That if he had been found dead at home, there were enough drugs in his system that they would have been ruled the cause of death.
at trial they stated this, in testimony?
btw, police officers are supposed to help people od’ing, not kneeel on their necks. also someone who took enough opiates to OD is immobile, not walking around. oh, coincidentally somehow he took the fentanyl at exactly the right time to kill him and render him immobile, just when Chauvin was kneeling on him. total coincidence!
That’s not what I said. The Medical Examiner didn’t say the fentanyl killed him. Just that he had a level high enough that if, for example, he had died in his home that day, fentanyl would have been ruled the likely cause. See the difference?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know if there are toxicology reports for Chauvin? Was he high on drugs at the time he killed Floyd?
Yes. The Medical Examiner stated that there was enough fentanyl to have killed him. That if he had been found dead at home, there were enough drugs in his system that they would have been ruled the cause of death.
PP is asking if CHAUVIN (the police officer) was high. Not George Floyd.
chauvin being on ‘roids would explain a lot
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know if there are toxicology reports for Chauvin? Was he high on drugs at the time he killed Floyd?
Yes. The Medical Examiner stated that there was enough fentanyl to have killed him. That if he had been found dead at home, there were enough drugs in his system that they would have been ruled the cause of death.
at trial they stated this, in testimony?
btw, police officers are supposed to help people od’ing, not kneeel on their necks. also someone who took enough opiates to OD is immobile, not walking around. oh, coincidentally somehow he took the fentanyl at exactly the right time to kill him and render him immobile, just when Chauvin was kneeling on him. total coincidence!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Floyd was a walking time bomb health wise.
Multiple experts testified that there was no evidence to support the idea that he would have died that day were it not for the man who sat on his neck for 9 minutes.
Yes, he was unhealthy. He should've have been put in the recovery position as soon as was possible. He should've been given aid as soon as was the officers saw that he was in distress.
There is no evidence to suggest that he died suddenly (heart attack or stroke) or that he OD'd which would have been a slow and peaceful fading away. What everyone who saw that video witnessed was a man suffocating to death.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lawyers, help me out here. I just don’t see how he could possibly found guilty for murder 2 or murder 3. Can you explain how this could be argued?
I do see how he could be found guilty of excessive force or manslaughter.
It doesn't need to be argued.
The question is, what will happen if he is NOT found guilty?
Probably riots that will result in more death. LEOs may die.
Bad cops hurt good cops. When will the system change so the bad ones can be dismissed before it's too late?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know if there are toxicology reports for Chauvin? Was he high on drugs at the time he killed Floyd?
Yes. The Medical Examiner stated that there was enough fentanyl to have killed him. That if he had been found dead at home, there were enough drugs in his system that they would have been ruled the cause of death.
PP is asking if CHAUVIN (the police officer) was high. Not George Floyd.
chauvin being on ‘roids would explain a lot
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lawyers, help me out here. I just don’t see how he could possibly found guilty for murder 2 or murder 3. Can you explain how this could be argued?
I do see how he could be found guilty of excessive force or manslaughter.
It doesn't need to be argued.
The question is, what will happen if he is NOT found guilty?
Anonymous wrote:Lawyers, help me out here. I just don’t see how he could possibly found guilty for murder 2 or murder 3. Can you explain how this could be argued?
I do see how he could be found guilty of excessive force or manslaughter.
Anonymous wrote:Floyd was a walking time bomb health wise.
Anonymous wrote:Lawyers, help me out here. I just don’t see how he could possibly found guilty for murder 2 or murder 3. Can you explain how this could be argued?
I do see how he could be found guilty of excessive force or manslaughter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know if there are toxicology reports for Chauvin? Was he high on drugs at the time he killed Floyd?
Yes. The Medical Examiner stated that there was enough fentanyl to have killed him. That if he had been found dead at home, there were enough drugs in his system that they would have been ruled the cause of death.
PP is asking if CHAUVIN (the police officer) was high. Not George Floyd.
Anonymous wrote:Floyd was a walking time bomb health wise.