Anonymous
07/15/2020 17:03
Subject: Re:How widespread is the boycott against Goya Foods?
Anonymous wrote:
Wiki:
"The Hatch Act of 1939, An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political Activities, is a United States federal law whose main provision prohibits employees in the executive branch of the federal government, except the president, vice president, and certain designated high-level officials,[1] from engaging in some forms of political activity."
Guess he had to push all the important papers and what not off his desk...lol what a loser.
Anonymous
07/15/2020 16:51
Subject: How widespread is the boycott against Goya Foods?
Some posters really need to get out more.
Anonymous
07/15/2020 16:47
Subject: How widespread is the boycott against Goya Foods?
Anonymous
07/15/2020 16:40
Subject: Re:How widespread is the boycott against Goya Foods?
Wiki:
"The Hatch Act of 1939, An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political Activities, is a United States federal law whose main provision prohibits employees in the executive branch of the federal government, except the president, vice president, and certain designated high-level officials,[1] from engaging in some forms of political activity."
Anonymous
07/15/2020 16:26
Subject: How widespread is the boycott against Goya Foods?
Those Whole Food cans are usually about $.79, aka less expensive than the Goya cans at Safeway.
Anonymous
Anonymous
07/15/2020 16:17
Subject: How widespread is the boycott against Goya Foods?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't get why the Trump supporters are so afraid of the free market. This is capitalism in action. There are market choices and people are making them. Why do Trump supporters fear capitalism?
Because there are more of us than them. When we boycott, it actually works. When they boycott, nobody cares. Capitalism.
You sure about that?
Yes. Evidence is the popular vote. We are more in number. When the majority stops purchasing, it works. But please, go burn some Nikes. Nobody cares.
Just as no one cares if you buy Goya or not. And fwiw, neither I nor anyone I know burned our Nikes. Ridiculous.
Anonymous
Anonymous
07/15/2020 15:42
Subject: How widespread is the boycott against Goya Foods?
Yes, but given all of the other crimes he isn't being held to account for, then just throw this on the pile.
Anonymous
07/15/2020 15:41
Subject: Re:How widespread is the boycott against Goya Foods?
Anonymous
07/15/2020 15:20
Subject: Re:How widespread is the boycott against Goya Foods?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ivanka shared a photo of herself with Goya beans.
another ethics violation by the First Family of Corruption.
What exactly did she do to warrant an "ethics violation?"
5 CFR § 2635.702
Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (e-CFR) Title 5. Administrative Personnel Chapter XVI. OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT ETHICS Subchapter B. GOVERNMENT ETHICS Part 2635. STANDARDS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH Subpart G. Misuse of Position Section 2635.702. Use of public office for private gain.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/5/2635.702
“An employee shall not use…public office for [her] own private gain, for the endorsement of any product, service or enterprise, or for the private gain of friends, relatives or persons with whom the employee is affiliated”
LOL really? Who is going to bring charges...the AG? We have no constitution.
You, the voter, are our last line of defense against this corruption. Unless you care more about protecting billionaires from woke liberals than protecting the Constitution.
Anonymous
07/15/2020 15:20
Subject: How widespread is the boycott against Goya Foods?
Crony Capitalism.
Anonymous
Anonymous
07/15/2020 15:17
Subject: Re:How widespread is the boycott against Goya Foods?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ivanka shared a photo of herself with Goya beans.
another ethics violation by the First Family of Corruption.
What exactly did she do to warrant an "ethics violation?"
5 CFR § 2635.702
Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (e-CFR) Title 5. Administrative Personnel Chapter XVI. OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT ETHICS Subchapter B. GOVERNMENT ETHICS Part 2635. STANDARDS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH Subpart G. Misuse of Position Section 2635.702. Use of public office for private gain.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/5/2635.702
“An employee shall not use…public office for [her] own private gain, for the endorsement of any product, service or enterprise, or for the private gain of friends, relatives or persons with whom the employee is affiliated”
LOL really? Who is going to bring charges...the AG? We have no constitution.