Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They're talking about the gap in time of symptoms and testing now. It sounds like the went to a country/location that wasn't on the radar of potential outbreaks at the time.

Then why not mention the country? Shouldn't that country now know. There is absolutely no reason to not notify people.

they were on a cruise. the grand princess from san fran to mexico

https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/06/health/california-coronavirus-friday/index.html

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:well did they at least contact businesses they have been to even if not announcing them publicly? geez

What is the point. Enough people have already been exposed. Every person the NY lawyer came in contact with has tested positive so far - every.single.one. This is only a matter of time.

Do you know this for sure? I haven't heard this claim on a reliable media so I'd like a cited source please.

Anonymous wrote:well did they at least contact businesses they have been to even if not announcing them publicly? geez

What is the point. Enough people have already been exposed. Every person the NY lawyer came in contact with has tested positive so far - every.single.one. This is only a matter of time.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To recap: contradictory advice

Stay home 14 days if I think I’ve been exposed, but don’t buy two weeks of food now (that’s panic hoarding!) so I have it when I need it.

Also, wear a mask if I am sick and must obtain medical care, but the government doesn’t want me to buy masks while I am well. So I will obtain the mask to keep my coronavirus to myself how?

Also hearing keep going to work.

LOL

well did they at least contact businesses they have been to even if not announcing them publicly? geez

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:per live stream: "To the best of knowledge, they didn't travel into the district or VA. "

Hardly matters if they gave it to anyone who DID travel elsewhere.

Exactly! Complete morons.

Anonymous wrote:To recap: contradictory advice

Stay home 14 days if I think I’ve been exposed, but don’t buy two weeks of food now (that’s panic hoarding!) so I have it when I need it.

Also, wear a mask if I am sick and must obtain medical care, but the government doesn’t want me to buy masks while I am well. So I will obtain the mask to keep my coronavirus to myself how?

Also hearing keep going to work.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is beyond embarrassing. Which grocery stores, pharmacies, and other locations they went to DOES NOT invade their privacy. It increases the spread of a disease the country is trying to contain. Good Lord, our state is terrible.

I agree, but sadly I bet it would hurt the businesses. Imagine if they said the couple hit a local restaurant, I bet no one would go!

Unfortunate but they still should say

They could just close for a day and decontaminate.

Anonymous wrote:per live stream: "To the best of knowledge, they didn't travel into the district or VA. "

Hardly matters if they gave it to anyone who DID travel elsewhere.

To recap: contradictory advice

Stay home 14 days if I think I’ve been exposed, but don’t buy two weeks of food now (that’s panic hoarding!) so I have it when I need it.

Also, wear a mask if I am sick and must obtain medical care, but the government doesn’t want me to buy masks while I am well. So I will obtain the mask to keep my coronavirus to myself how?

per live stream: "To the best of knowledge, they didn't travel into the district or VA. "

Sounds like their symptoms were mild enough (combined with traveling to a place that wasn't high risk) that they weren't immediately concerned with these 3 cases being more than cold/flu. Once other countries started logging confirmed cases, the people on this cruise were asked to go in for testing if they showed symptoms.

Anonymous wrote:They're talking about the gap in time of symptoms and testing now. It sounds like the went to a country/location that wasn't on the radar of potential outbreaks at the time.

Then why not mention the country? Shouldn't that country now know. There is absolutely no reason to not notify people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is beyond embarrassing. Which grocery stores, pharmacies, and other locations they went to DOES NOT invade their privacy. It increases the spread of a disease the country is trying to contain. Good Lord, our state is terrible.

I agree, but sadly I bet it would hurt the businesses. Imagine if they said the couple hit a local restaurant, I bet no one would go!

Unfortunate but they still should say

Anonymous wrote:they have specifics on where the people have been since they returned, but they won't share for privacy reasons.

which is crazy to me. Hong Kong and Singapore, which both have been successful at containing/mitigating, publish the actual address of patients and every place they have been. When someone has measles, they publish a long list of places they visited. They need to start doing the same for this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is beyond embarrassing. Which grocery stores, pharmacies, and other locations they went to DOES NOT invade their privacy. It increases the spread of a disease the country is trying to contain. Good Lord, our state is terrible.

I agree, but sadly I bet it would hurt the businesses. Imagine if they said the couple hit a local restaurant, I bet no one would go!

Well better make sure the businesses are thriving instead of checking the workers or the people that were there they day there were. Makes sense.