Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I haven't read all 30 pages but the people who seem most passionately against this are from Wheaton, Silver Spring and Bethesda. I just can't imagine anyone in Potomac, Poolesville, or Darnestown even caring about this issue. Rockville is in its own war with developers so they aren't supporting it.
It just doesn't seem like anyone who owns/lives in Montgomery County is for it. Is this just coming from developers or renters?
Hans Reimer was a huge advocate for this, though the law passed unanimously.
Could be wrong, but I believe that Reimer is a transplant from California and it hoping to implement similar 'progressive' policies here in Montgomery County.
Anonymous wrote:I haven't read all 30 pages but the people who seem most passionately against this are from Wheaton, Silver Spring and Bethesda. I just can't imagine anyone in Potomac, Poolesville, or Darnestown even caring about this issue. Rockville is in its own war with developers so they aren't supporting it.
It just doesn't seem like anyone who owns/lives in Montgomery County is for it. Is this just coming from developers or renters?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I haven't read all 30 pages but the people who seem most passionately against this are from Wheaton, Silver Spring and Bethesda. I just can't imagine anyone in Potomac, Poolesville, or Darnestown even caring about this issue. Rockville is in its own war with developers so they aren't supporting it.
It just doesn't seem like anyone who owns/lives in Montgomery County is for it. Is this just coming from developers or renters?
The County is trying to be more 'immigrant friendly' and passed this law to allow for more 'affordable housing' for immigrants.
Also, landlords are already seeing huge benefits from the lack of housing code enforcement because they are able to openly flaunt the rules. There is a TON of money to be made in the county with these illegal rentals. The owners themselves don't live in Wheaton/Silver Spring etc, so they don't care what it does to the neighborhoods and schools.
Anonymous wrote:I haven't read all 30 pages but the people who seem most passionately against this are from Wheaton, Silver Spring and Bethesda. I just can't imagine anyone in Potomac, Poolesville, or Darnestown even caring about this issue. Rockville is in its own war with developers so they aren't supporting it.
It just doesn't seem like anyone who owns/lives in Montgomery County is for it. Is this just coming from developers or renters?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I haven't read all 30 pages but the people who seem most passionately against this are from Wheaton, Silver Spring and Bethesda. I just can't imagine anyone in Potomac, Poolesville, or Darnestown even caring about this issue. Rockville is in its own war with developers so they aren't supporting it.
It just doesn't seem like anyone who owns/lives in Montgomery County is for it. Is this just coming from developers or renters?
Plenty of people who live in Montgomery County are for it, including people who own their homes.
Note that the ADU regulation has no benefit for developers, because it requires the owner to live on the property.
Anonymous wrote:I haven't read all 30 pages but the people who seem most passionately against this are from Wheaton, Silver Spring and Bethesda. I just can't imagine anyone in Potomac, Poolesville, or Darnestown even caring about this issue. Rockville is in its own war with developers so they aren't supporting it.
It just doesn't seem like anyone who owns/lives in Montgomery County is for it. Is this just coming from developers or renters?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Do children live there, or not?
Yes they do. am I missing something for why you keep asking?
Because other PPs right here on this thread, this morning, have said that it's all single men, not families with children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Give it time. Is there an HOA? Once the price drops enough, a (most likely Chinese) landlord will purchase the home and divide it up into a boarding house. They are interested in pretty much any neighborhood, without an HOA, once the home goes under $500K.
It ends up being an incredibly lucrative business model for the landlords. The rent out to illegal immigrant men or families with young kids. They have no lease or rental license, so can force them out at will. And, they collect cash only rent so that they do not have to report any income. Also, they fix the houses up as poorly as possible - it's all being done illegally anyway, so there is no reason for them to keep the buildings up to code.
Not sure why people support this kind of thing. Honestly, it puts these illegal immigrant families at risk. We have one that has several babies who live there, and the home is absolutely, positively not up to code. Seems dangerous, and is definitely overcrowded. Why would anyone defend letting kids (or really anyone) live in these homes as a good thing to encourage?
Probably you mean "rooming house".
Also you can't file for an eviction if you don't have a rental license.
I haven't noticed anybody supporting the idea of babies living in houses that aren't up to code.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Do children live there, or not?
Yes they do. am I missing something for why you keep asking?
Anonymous wrote:You're saying that it's only a problem if it's a house full of single male laborers. Well, it's also a problem to have three families living in a house that normally would fit one family.