Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they don't find a body, don't expect a guilty verdict. Inevitably, some juror will believe that the woman is still alive and living on a secret island will Elvis and Bigfoot.

Not with all the blood found in the garage and her soon to be ex caught on surveillance tape dumping bags filled with items covered in her blood.

The jurors will understand that her body was probably destroyed and incinerated at the dump. There is ample evidence that she was harmed and that her soon to be ex and his girlfriend tried to cover it up. Guilty.

You really overestimate the intelligence of a hand picked jury.

All that blood could be planted by the police. DNA isn't 100%. That's _reasonable_ doubt.

DP- no. Plenty of people are found guilty without a body.

Yes, if you use a public defender. Apparently this guy has some money.

Apparently he doesn’t have any money. So, he killed his wife to get hers.

Exactly! Looks like she's the one who came from money -- and her family now will do anything to have the dude convicted. I'm positive he will not get away with murder.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This article says Fotis Dulos might go for a jury trial...wish I could be on that jury.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/fotis-dulos-hires-alex-jones-attorney-to-defend-him-in-disappearance-of-his-wife-jennifer

What possible reason could his attorney offer for why Dulos and girlfriend were driving around dumping bags with items that have Jennifer's blood?

All they have to do is bring it back to the fact that there's no body and you can't convict someone of manslaughter without absolute certainty.

He probably would have taken a deal if CT had the death penalty.

I know this is a few pages back but this really is not true. There have been plenty of cases where people where convicted of first degree murder without a body - and some of those cases were challenged on appeal and the conviction stood.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This article says Fotis Dulos might go for a jury trial...wish I could be on that jury.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/fotis-dulos-hires-alex-jones-attorney-to-defend-him-in-disappearance-of-his-wife-jennifer

What possible reason could his attorney offer for why Dulos and girlfriend were driving around dumping bags with items that have Jennifer's blood?

All they have to do is bring it back to the fact that there's no body and you can't convict someone of manslaughter without absolute certainty.

He probably would have taken a deal if CT had the death penalty.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they don't find a body, don't expect a guilty verdict. Inevitably, some juror will believe that the woman is still alive and living on a secret island will Elvis and Bigfoot.

Not with all the blood found in the garage and her soon to be ex caught on surveillance tape dumping bags filled with items covered in her blood.

The jurors will understand that her body was probably destroyed and incinerated at the dump. There is ample evidence that she was harmed and that her soon to be ex and his girlfriend tried to cover it up. Guilty.

You really overestimate the intelligence of a hand picked jury.

All that blood could be planted by the police. DNA isn't 100%. That's _reasonable_ doubt.

DP- no. Plenty of people are found guilty without a body.

Yes, if you use a public defender. Apparently this guy has some money.

Apparently he doesn’t have any money. So, he killed his wife to get hers.

Anonymous wrote:Now saying gf has an alibi.

Anonymous wrote:The divorce had 400 motions so far. This was beyond contentious.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they don't find a body, don't expect a guilty verdict. Inevitably, some juror will believe that the woman is still alive and living on a secret island will Elvis and Bigfoot.

Not with all the blood found in the garage and her soon to be ex caught on surveillance tape dumping bags filled with items covered in her blood.

The jurors will understand that her body was probably destroyed and incinerated at the dump. There is ample evidence that she was harmed and that her soon to be ex and his girlfriend tried to cover it up. Guilty.

You really overestimate the intelligence of a hand picked jury.

All that blood could be planted by the police. DNA isn't 100%. That's _reasonable_ doubt.

DP- no. Plenty of people are found guilty without a body.

Yes, if you use a public defender. Apparently this guy has some money.

Anonymous wrote:Or he'll say he and his wife got into an argument. She said something vile about the girlfriend, and the girlfriend flipped out and struck her over the head with a shovel or whatever. He helped girlfriend dispose of the evidence, but he did not kill his wife--girlfriend did and she's trying to pin it on him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Depends on how much blood. If a certain amount of blood is found it can be established that living through it unlikely or not possible.
The narrative is to easy to imagine. It makes a step by step guilty look.

Blood in the garage, as well as, blood soaked items from the crime scene would indicate that Jennifer was badly hurt. They dumped bags into *30* different dumpsters. The evidence must be overwhelming against them.