Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They actually do compete against each other. You do understand that there are some people on this board that have done their homework. I don't have a horse in this race but believe that McLean is the top program. FCV is probably the 2nd top program in the area.
Very few instances of cross-competition between the two. And even less between the ECNL and GDA clubs in this area. Get back to your homework.
Why so many morons on this board?
Per GDA vs ECNL, I did not say that the clubs play each other every week but know that they have played each other in select showcase events/tournaments this past year. The Penn Fusion Showcase was the main one I am aware of but there were others.
Look, if you don't have anything of value to add then just back off. I am tired of the stupidity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They actually do compete against each other. You do understand that there are some people on this board that have done their homework. I don't have a horse in this race but believe that McLean is the top program. FCV is probably the 2nd top program in the area.
Very few instances of cross-competition between the two. And even less between the ECNL and GDA clubs in this area. Get back to your homework.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone else waiting for an ECNL offer? Crossing fingers for tonight, clearly we are second or third round.
Did your DC actually go to an ECNL tryout? Just making sure we all on the same page
Anonymous wrote:Anyone else waiting for an ECNL offer? Crossing fingers for tonight, clearly we are second or third round.
Anonymous wrote:They actually do compete against each other. You do understand that there are some people on this board that have done their homework. I don't have a horse in this race but believe that McLean is the top program. FCV is probably the 2nd top program in the area.
Anonymous wrote:Questions asked and answered: Mclean. Let's give FCV and Bethesda their due but MYS is by far the top program.
https://www.soccerwire.com/news/clubs/youth-girls/thirteen-potomac-area-teams-qualify-for-ecnl-champions-league-playoffs/
http://www.mcleansoccer.org/home.php?layout=10683781
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BRYC has sent a first round of offers.
Have all offers been sent out?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any word on the format of the ECNL II?
ECNL II is not being rolled out this year for NOVA teams.
It impacts the MD teams next year. The "B" teams will play in ECNL II, which will mirror the same schedule as the ECNL I teams.
Main positive for clubs is more $$$.
Main positive for B team players is that presumably they will have more chances to play up with A team since both A team and B team will be playing same opponents on same day at the same location. For example, if A team has some injuries, illnesses or conflicts with its players not being able to play, then it is much easier for B team girls to fill in. Perhaps some clubs will even take a more academy-style approach to their rosters for A and B teams for games each weekend, but I doubt it.
Main negative for B team parents and players is increased $$$ and increased travel on away weekends.
CCL I and CCL II with much more travel. Asking B team families to pay 5-7k per child is a joke when their local competition is just good enough for 1.5-2.5k (including team fees).
BINGO! And the DA will be the next league to do the same garbage. DA and DA2. And I say this as someone who thinks the DA is the best option available.
Anonymous wrote:BRYC has sent a first round of offers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any word on the format of the ECNL II?
ECNL II is not being rolled out this year for NOVA teams.
It impacts the MD teams next year. The "B" teams will play in ECNL II, which will mirror the same schedule as the ECNL I teams.
Main positive for clubs is more $$$.
Main positive for B team players is that presumably they will have more chances to play up with A team since both A team and B team will be playing same opponents on same day at the same location. For example, if A team has some injuries, illnesses or conflicts with its players not being able to play, then it is much easier for B team girls to fill in. Perhaps some clubs will even take a more academy-style approach to their rosters for A and B teams for games each weekend, but I doubt it.
Main negative for B team parents and players is increased $$$ and increased travel on away weekends.
CCL I and CCL II with much more travel. Asking B team families to pay 5-7k per child is a joke when their local competition is just good enough for 1.5-2.5k (including team fees).