Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are going out of your way to look for negatives, when an overwhelming amount of feedback is positive. That’s what doesn’t seem right. You’re not even with the club, but surely SOMETHING must be going on there? Yawn. Again, it’s not for everyone. I’m not sure they will lose sleep over not having you, over something you read on an anonymous dc urban moms board. You could contact the club, you could go down there and see their processes for yourself, but no, you’re making assumptions based on what a bitter person wrote.
What makes you think I haven't been to Evergreen to see them? Your response seems aggressive, which is exactly what i was saying.
Different poster here. So you are not even part of the program since you suggested that you may have come to Evergreen "to see them", but you are railing against the program based on however many minutes you spent peeking in? You keep saying negative things, but FCB tryouts were full with multiple players coming from DAs and ODP. The program must be doing something right to attract them.
I think you people did a good job scaring her off. I didn't think that poster railed against anything, she just made a comment about the thread and got trashed for it.
Scared off? Real scary, an anonymous board.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are going out of your way to look for negatives, when an overwhelming amount of feedback is positive. That’s what doesn’t seem right. You’re not even with the club, but surely SOMETHING must be going on there? Yawn. Again, it’s not for everyone. I’m not sure they will lose sleep over not having you, over something you read on an anonymous dc urban moms board. You could contact the club, you could go down there and see their processes for yourself, but no, you’re making assumptions based on what a bitter person wrote.
What makes you think I haven't been to Evergreen to see them? Your response seems aggressive, which is exactly what i was saying.
Different poster here. So you are not even part of the program since you suggested that you may have come to Evergreen "to see them", but you are railing against the program based on however many minutes you spent peeking in? You keep saying negative things, but FCB tryouts were full with multiple players coming from DAs and ODP. The program must be doing something right to attract them.
I think you people did a good job scaring her off. I didn't think that poster railed against anything, she just made a comment about the thread and got trashed for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are going out of your way to look for negatives, when an overwhelming amount of feedback is positive. That’s what doesn’t seem right. You’re not even with the club, but surely SOMETHING must be going on there? Yawn. Again, it’s not for everyone. I’m not sure they will lose sleep over not having you, over something you read on an anonymous dc urban moms board. You could contact the club, you could go down there and see their processes for yourself, but no, you’re making assumptions based on what a bitter person wrote.
What makes you think I haven't been to Evergreen to see them? Your response seems aggressive, which is exactly what i was saying.
Different poster here. So you are not even part of the program since you suggested that you may have come to Evergreen "to see them", but you are railing against the program based on however many minutes you spent peeking in? You keep saying negative things, but FCB tryouts were full with multiple players coming from DAs and ODP. The program must be doing something right to attract them.
Anonymous wrote:
This is the norm at most European academies. Soccer related things are discussed between the player and the coach. Coaches coach, parents support. This may be hard for helicopter parents to accept.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are going out of your way to look for negatives, when an overwhelming amount of feedback is positive. That’s what doesn’t seem right. You’re not even with the club, but surely SOMETHING must be going on there? Yawn. Again, it’s not for everyone. I’m not sure they will lose sleep over not having you, over something you read on an anonymous dc urban moms board. You could contact the club, you could go down there and see their processes for yourself, but no, you’re making assumptions based on what a bitter person wrote.
What makes you think I haven't been to Evergreen to see them? Your response seems aggressive, which is exactly what i was saying.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are going out of your way to look for negatives, when an overwhelming amount of feedback is positive. That’s what doesn’t seem right. You’re not even with the club, but surely SOMETHING must be going on there? Yawn. Again, it’s not for everyone. I’m not sure they will lose sleep over not having you, over something you read on an anonymous dc urban moms board. You could contact the club, you could go down there and see their processes for yourself, but no, you’re making assumptions based on what a bitter person wrote.
What makes you think I haven't been to Evergreen to see them? Your response seems aggressive, which is exactly what i was saying.
In that case, you’re either grasping at straws, or simply playing devil’s advocate to amuse yourself. You really are offering nothing to this conversation other than being vague and conspiratory. Best of luck with your agenda.
Wow, I see. Thanks again for your help. Your last sentence is more fitting in return.
Best of luck with your agenda.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are going out of your way to look for negatives, when an overwhelming amount of feedback is positive. That’s what doesn’t seem right. You’re not even with the club, but surely SOMETHING must be going on there? Yawn. Again, it’s not for everyone. I’m not sure they will lose sleep over not having you, over something you read on an anonymous dc urban moms board. You could contact the club, you could go down there and see their processes for yourself, but no, you’re making assumptions based on what a bitter person wrote.
What makes you think I haven't been to Evergreen to see them? Your response seems aggressive, which is exactly what i was saying.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are going out of your way to look for negatives, when an overwhelming amount of feedback is positive. That’s what doesn’t seem right. You’re not even with the club, but surely SOMETHING must be going on there? Yawn. Again, it’s not for everyone. I’m not sure they will lose sleep over not having you, over something you read on an anonymous dc urban moms board. You could contact the club, you could go down there and see their processes for yourself, but no, you’re making assumptions based on what a bitter person wrote.
What makes you think I haven't been to Evergreen to see them? Your response seems aggressive, which is exactly what i was saying.
In that case, you’re either grasping at straws, or simply playing devil’s advocate to amuse yourself. You really are offering nothing to this conversation other than being vague and conspiratory. Best of luck with your agenda.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are going out of your way to look for negatives, when an overwhelming amount of feedback is positive. That’s what doesn’t seem right. You’re not even with the club, but surely SOMETHING must be going on there? Yawn. Again, it’s not for everyone. I’m not sure they will lose sleep over not having you, over something you read on an anonymous dc urban moms board. You could contact the club, you could go down there and see their processes for yourself, but no, you’re making assumptions based on what a bitter person wrote.
What makes you think I haven't been to Evergreen to see them? Your response seems aggressive, which is exactly what i was saying.
Anonymous wrote:You are going out of your way to look for negatives, when an overwhelming amount of feedback is positive. That’s what doesn’t seem right. You’re not even with the club, but surely SOMETHING must be going on there? Yawn. Again, it’s not for everyone. I’m not sure they will lose sleep over not having you, over something you read on an anonymous dc urban moms board. You could contact the club, you could go down there and see their processes for yourself, but no, you’re making assumptions based on what a bitter person wrote.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a former manager with a full-time day job, not having to volunteer for anything is well-worth the $ !!! The staff handles everything. We just pay and drop our kids off and pick them up in designated spot. FCB registers all the players, takes the players' photos for player cards, organizes/register for tournaments. It's so nice, seriously. And, it avoids the drama like the fight going on between a parent and the team manager in another recent thread.
Exactly. Again, if you don’t get it, you just don’t get it. You don’t have to send your player there, but why knock it by spreading misinformation? They focus exclusively on development, and anyone that says otherwise is lying.
This sounds like a case of pot, meet kettle. Of course, the guy on your side is telling the truth and the guy who is not is lying. It's the way of the world.
There was a serious question raised though. Do you believe that the TD (assuming that coaches really NEVER speak with parents on any level), or any staff member, is incorruptible? That they may not curry to favorities based on their biases? That sounds very naive to me. It's a very human flaw and I'm more inclined to believe a poster who says they have seen it than someone who insists the staff at a club (any club) are beyond reproach. It's just not a realistic belief, where human beings are concerned.
What I would believe is that the disgruntled parent likely tried to curry favor for their kid and didn’t succeed.
I’m not really sure what favors a parent could have expected from Barca last year. There were no established teams. At one point or another during the week each coach worked with each player.
Players were placed in fluid groups and moved based on progress or need. I’m not really sure what influence the poster thinks any parent would either want or achieve by “corrupting” the coach. Perhaps you could get that cushy 10am game time for the internal friendly instead of 9am?
Or maybe that trip to Spain and other perks of being considered a top player. Oh, I forgot, there are no favorites in this program. I need to be more disciplined and stick to the propaganda points!
Keep grasping at straws, clown![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a former manager with a full-time day job, not having to volunteer for anything is well-worth the $ !!! The staff handles everything. We just pay and drop our kids off and pick them up in designated spot. FCB registers all the players, takes the players' photos for player cards, organizes/register for tournaments. It's so nice, seriously. And, it avoids the drama like the fight going on between a parent and the team manager in another recent thread.
Exactly. Again, if you don’t get it, you just don’t get it. You don’t have to send your player there, but why knock it by spreading misinformation? They focus exclusively on development, and anyone that says otherwise is lying.
This sounds like a case of pot, meet kettle. Of course, the guy on your side is telling the truth and the guy who is not is lying. It's the way of the world.
There was a serious question raised though. Do you believe that the TD (assuming that coaches really NEVER speak with parents on any level), or any staff member, is incorruptible? That they may not curry to favorities based on their biases? That sounds very naive to me. It's a very human flaw and I'm more inclined to believe a poster who says they have seen it than someone who insists the staff at a club (any club) are beyond reproach. It's just not a realistic belief, where human beings are concerned.
What I would believe is that the disgruntled parent likely tried to curry favor for their kid and didn’t succeed.
I’m not really sure what favors a parent could have expected from Barca last year. There were no established teams. At one point or another during the week each coach worked with each player.
Players were placed in fluid groups and moved based on progress or need. I’m not really sure what influence the poster thinks any parent would either want or achieve by “corrupting” the coach. Perhaps you could get that cushy 10am game time for the internal friendly instead of 9am?
Or maybe that trip to Spain and other perks of being considered a top player. Oh, I forgot, there are no favorites in this program. I need to be more disciplined and stick to the propaganda points!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a former manager with a full-time day job, not having to volunteer for anything is well-worth the $ !!! The staff handles everything. We just pay and drop our kids off and pick them up in designated spot. FCB registers all the players, takes the players' photos for player cards, organizes/register for tournaments. It's so nice, seriously. And, it avoids the drama like the fight going on between a parent and the team manager in another recent thread.
Exactly. Again, if you don’t get it, you just don’t get it. You don’t have to send your player there, but why knock it by spreading misinformation? They focus exclusively on development, and anyone that says otherwise is lying.
This sounds like a case of pot, meet kettle. Of course, the guy on your side is telling the truth and the guy who is not is lying. It's the way of the world.
There was a serious question raised though. Do you believe that the TD (assuming that coaches really NEVER speak with parents on any level), or any staff member, is incorruptible? That they may not curry to favorities based on their biases? That sounds very naive to me. It's a very human flaw and I'm more inclined to believe a poster who says they have seen it than someone who insists the staff at a club (any club) are beyond reproach. It's just not a realistic belief, where human beings are concerned.
What I would believe is that the disgruntled parent likely tried to curry favor for their kid and didn’t succeed.
I’m not really sure what favors a parent could have expected from Barca last year. There were no established teams. At one point or another during the week each coach worked with each player.
Players were placed in fluid groups and moved based on progress or need. I’m not really sure what influence the poster thinks any parent would either want or achieve by “corrupting” the coach. Perhaps you could get that cushy 10am game time for the internal friendly instead of 9am?
Or maybe that trip to Spain and other perks of being considered a top player. Oh, I forgot, there are no favorites in this program. I need to be more disciplined and stick to the propaganda points!