Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Applied from a private school?
No, public. It got bad enough (teacher making up stuff to justify what she was doing) that they had to get the principal involved. She retired shortly thereafter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op here
Got a response that scores are just one of many data points and each file is holistically examined by multiple people. And this decision is final for this year. Also mentioned that I am free to apply in next screening cycle
Honestly with those scores I would raise hell.
Anonymous wrote:Op here
No we cannot afford another year in private school
We don’t know what else to do next
Anonymous wrote:Op here
No we cannot afford another year in private school
We don’t know what else to do next
Anonymous wrote:Op here
Got a response that scores are just one of many data points and each file is holistically examined by multiple people. And this decision is final for this year. Also mentioned that I am free to apply in next screening cycle
Anonymous wrote:Op here
Got a response that scores are just one of many data points and each file is holistically examined by multiple people. And this decision is final for this year. Also mentioned that I am free to apply in next screening cycle
Anonymous wrote:Op here
Missed the call from the coordinator she had asked me to send an email as they are in meetings most of the time
Planning to mail what possible reason they have to reject Wisc and whom should I contact to review/ reconsider the application
Anything I should add or modify?
Anonymous wrote:Applied from a private school?
Anonymous wrote:OP posted that two other applicants from her school were admitted, so the teachers know how/what to write in comments.
What does it tell the committee if there's no work sample in OP's file, along with underwhelming comments???
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The problem is that tests are taken on one, or at most a few days. It is possible to prep children for tests so that they get higher scores than they would without prepping.
Teacher comments, on the other hand, are based on many, many days of first hand observation. Sometimes children's behaviors back up test scores, sometimes they don't. Kids who are not exhibiting "gifted" behaviors generally are capable of having their educational needs met in the regular classroom.
Looking at only test scores does not give a detailed enough picture of the child and his or her educational needs.
9:06 PP again. My kid scored 99th percentile on both cogat and wisc. That child was also way above grade level on iready, is in above grade level groups for all subjects, is grade skipped (in fcps) for one subject, and gets excellent grades. If that child ends up being given a low GBRS, that's more a reflection that the teacher is an idiot or the teacher just doesn't like my child than it is a reflection of my child's giftedness or educational needs. Judgement of whether a kid is exhibiting gifted behaviors is pretty arbitrary and shouldn't be the deciding factor. I'm fortunate, in that I have no reason to expect a low GBRS. We have seen on this forum, however, that many gifted children who are shy or those who are subject to weird teacher biases get low GBRS.
or are brown or black (which falls into the bias teachers show)