Anonymous wrote:Apparently, NJ and PA have strict rules in place regarding inspections. Makes me feel better about our yearly trip to Great Adventure!
All these stories had me a little nervous, TBH.
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/thrill-ride-accidents-spark-demands-regulation-145059427.html
Anonymous wrote:Enough already, the state elected and reelected Kathleen Selbelius for Governor twice.
Anonymous wrote:I can't imagine how a 275 pound 25-year old female would be able to climb the 17 stories to the top of the slide. To give you a visual, that is someone about the size of Mama June on Honey Boo Boo when she first lost weight. I also would not believe the ride could safely hold someone that large. That uneven of weight distribution, barely 100 pounds in front (my son 12-years old is 117 pounds & looks at least 4 inches taller than the boy) would case the back of the raft to go down while bringing the front of the raft up.
im bad at math and science but even. I could tell not balancing the weight is a bad idea. Just look at a see saw and go from there.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Something else read this morning before clicking on this thread said the Velcro failed. In any case wouldn't it make more sense to have the heaviest person in front of keeping from going airborne is the goal?
If a heavy person is in front, it could cause the back end of the raft to fly up. Heavy balance would be key.
Kansas City Star just ran an article on balance being key. An engineering expert offered an opinion that putting all the weight in the back could be a contributing factor to the crash.
http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/article95909677.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Something else read this morning before clicking on this thread said the Velcro failed. In any case wouldn't it make more sense to have the heaviest person in front of keeping from going airborne is the goal?
If a heavy person is in front, it could cause the back end of the raft to fly up. Heavy balance would be key.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has the idiot who designed this ride issued a statement yet?
The designer is one of the park's owners. I think they are all using the same statement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't imagine how a 275 pound 25-year old female would be able to climb the 17 stories to the top of the slide. To give you a visual, that is someone about the size of Mama June on Honey Boo Boo when she first lost weight. I also would not believe the ride could safely hold someone that large. That uneven of weight distribution, barely 100 pounds in front (my son 12-years old is 117 pounds & looks at least 4 inches taller than the boy) would case the back of the raft to go down while bringing the front of the raft up.
![]()
I hauled 247 pounds up the stairs to ride it with my kids.
Could be one where the line queues up on the stairs. So you take a few steps every minute or so, as the line moves. If so that makes it easier.
Anonymous wrote:Has the idiot who designed this ride issued a statement yet?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well I guess it's good that they can't pin it on the attendants. They were following protocol.
I've thought about that too, and am glad that they were. I can't imagine they guilt they might already feel, even though it seems that they did nothing wrong. What if they had put him with a different group, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Well I guess it's good that they can't pin it on the attendants. They were following protocol.