Anonymous wrote:I am fascinated by this case too and I agree with pp who said it's because they are "like me." Same as the maryland free range parents. I have similar education and would assume I had similar values. Yet here they are making choices I would not make. Why?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you imagine if you were hanging out with friends at a fancy restaurant and the police came to arrest them because...they had left their kids out in the car!?! I can't even imagine.
So did the police actually come into the restaurant? The dad was at the car. Did the police go into Ris to arrest the mom? Why isn't anyone from the wine tasting/restaurant talking about this to the media?
When the story first broke, the news had interviews with other people who were at the event. Sounds like the police went in, took the people out (not in handcuffs, but took them) and everyone else had to leave. Of course, I have no source for this other than what a restaurant customer told the news.
Anonymous wrote:The whole thing is truly bizarre. But I am a little weirded out by how obsessed I am by this case. I'd love to know more about the parents. Did they really seem like normal, involved parents? Do they have a full-time nanny during the week or do the kids attend a day-care? Were they with friends at the wine tasting or on their own?
The entire thing is just one big, huge WTF!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you imagine if you were hanging out with friends at a fancy restaurant and the police came to arrest them because...they had left their kids out in the car!?! I can't even imagine.
So did the police actually come into the restaurant? The dad was at the car. Did the police go into Ris to arrest the mom? Why isn't anyone from the wine tasting/restaurant talking about this to the media?
Anonymous wrote:Re children's memory, I am a neuroscientist and may be able to shed some light.
The part of the brain that coordinates storage of memories, the hippocampus, undergoes major reorganization around age 7. This is thought to be why most people have few or no memories from before this time. I think it also explains why a 5yo may perfectly well remember an event from 3 years earlier--they may not after age 7.
As for the PP who remembers a traumatic abandonment at age 3--traumas like that may be encoded differently, we know that fear and anger (mediated by the amygdala) can reinforce memories in adults, so it's likely that a memory of something fearsome may be more able to stick at any age. My DH also remembers being in a crib left alone to cry, looking at a particular mobile even. But he couldn't, say, tell you the floor plan of the house he lived in at that age.
So this kid may remember the experience or may not. However, CPS/DC is clearly betting that this isn't these parents' first neglectful act, or they wouldn't consider foster care safer for the kids than being home with their parents. So, sadly, it's probably the case that these kids have a lot of neglect to remember.
Anonymous wrote:Can you imagine if you were hanging out with friends at a fancy restaurant and the police came to arrest them because...they had left their kids out in the car!?! I can't even imagine.
Anonymous wrote:So now you can let your iphone babysit your kid...
good to know.